Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Creo VS CodeFactor.io

Compare Creo VS CodeFactor.io and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Creo logo Creo

Creo is a modern design tool for Mac which combines design and development.

CodeFactor.io logo CodeFactor.io

Automated Code Review for GitHub & BitBucket
  • Creo Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-21
  • CodeFactor.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-19

Creo features and specs

  • Rapid Prototyping
    Creo allows for quick iteration and creation of interactive prototypes, enabling fast validation of design ideas.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Supports both iOS and Mac, making it versatile for developers working across Apple’s ecosystem.
  • Intuitive Interface
    The user-friendly interface makes it accessible for both beginners and experienced developers.
  • Integrated Development Tools
    Comes with a variety of built-in tools, reducing the need for third-party software.
  • Design and Code Sync
    Seamless synchronization between design and code helps maintain consistency throughout the development process.

Possible disadvantages of Creo

  • Platform Limitation
    Currently limited to iOS and Mac, excluding developers who focus on other platforms like Android or Windows.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite an intuitive interface, there is still a learning curve associated with mastering all its features.
  • Pricing
    The cost can be prohibitive for freelancers or small development teams working with limited budgets.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users report performance lags, particularly with large projects.
  • Community Support
    Smaller user community compared to more established tools, leading to fewer resources for troubleshooting and advice.

CodeFactor.io features and specs

  • Real-time Code Review
    CodeFactor.io provides immediate feedback on code changes by performing real-time code reviews, which helps catch issues early in the development process.
  • Integration with Popular Platforms
    The platform offers seamless integration with popular version control systems like GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, allowing easy adoption into existing workflows.
  • Detailed Reports
    Generates detailed reports with clear metrics and actionable insights on code quality, helping teams understand and improve their codebase.
  • Automated Code Review
    Automates the code review process, saving developers time and ensuring consistency in code quality assessments.
  • Support for Multiple Languages
    Supports a wide range of programming languages, making it versatile for teams working with diverse technology stacks.

Possible disadvantages of CodeFactor.io

  • Limited Free Plan
    The free plan has limitations in terms of features and the number of private repositories it can support, which may not be sufficient for larger teams or projects.
  • False Positives/Negatives
    Like many automated code review tools, CodeFactor.io can sometimes generate false positives or negatives, which might require manual inspection.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users have reported performance issues, such as slow analysis times, especially with very large codebases.
  • Learning Curve
    Although the interface is user-friendly, there can be a learning curve associated with interpreting some of the more detailed metrics and reports.
  • Customization Limitations
    The level of customization in the analysis rules and settings can be limited compared to some other code quality tools, potentially restricting its adaptability to specific team needs.

Creo videos

Should I Buy a Turbo Creo? 2020 Specialized Turbo Creo Review

More videos:

  • Review - Specialized Turbo Creo SL Comp Carbon EVO Review - $6.5k
  • Review - Review: Specialized Turbo Creo SL Ultralight Electric Road and Gravel Bike

CodeFactor.io videos

Getting started with CodeFactor.io

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Creo and CodeFactor.io)
Application Builder
100 100%
0% 0
Code Coverage
0 0%
100% 100
Design Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Code Quality
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Creo and CodeFactor.io. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Creo seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Creo mentions (1)

  • Japan to crack down on Apple and Google app store monopolies
    For a small window of time, there was an alternative... https://creolabs.com/ but this is gone now. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

CodeFactor.io mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CodeFactor.io yet. Tracking of CodeFactor.io recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Creo and CodeFactor.io, you can also consider the following products

FreeCAD - An open-source parametric 3D modeler

Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.

Bubble.io - Building tech is slow and expensive. Bubble is the most powerful no-code platform for creating digital products.

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

Blender - Blender is the open source, cross platform suite of tools for 3D creation.

CodeClimate - Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.