Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CPU Frequency Selector VS Geekbench

Compare CPU Frequency Selector VS Geekbench and see what are their differences

CPU Frequency Selector logo CPU Frequency Selector

Cinnamon CPU Frequency Selector Applet

Geekbench logo Geekbench

Geekbench 4 measures your hardware's power and tells you whether your computer is ready to roar. How strong is your mobile or desktop system?
  • CPU Frequency Selector Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-22
  • Geekbench Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-21

CPU Frequency Selector features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    The Cinnamon CPU Frequency Selector applet provides a user-friendly interface for managing CPU frequency, making it accessible for users who prefer a GUI over command-line tools.
  • Fine-Grained Control
    It allows users to manually set the CPU frequency or choose between different governors, giving fine-grained control over performance and power consumption.
  • Integration with Cinnamon
    The applet integrates seamlessly with the Cinnamon desktop environment, offering a consistent user experience and an aesthetic that's familiar to Cinnamon users.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source, the applet is free to use, and users can modify it to fit their needs or contribute to its development.
  • Real-Time Information
    Users can view real-time information about CPU frequency and governor status directly from the applet, helping them make informed decisions about their CPU's performance.

Possible disadvantages of CPU Frequency Selector

  • Limited to Cinnamon
    The applet is specifically designed for the Cinnamon desktop environment, which limits its usability for those using other desktop environments.
  • Potential Stability Issues
    As with any software that alters system settings, there is a potential risk of stability issues or system crashes if not used properly.
  • Dependency on System Compatibility
    The effectiveness and functionality of the applet can depend on the compatibility of the underlying hardware and kernel with CPU frequency scaling.
  • Learning Curve for New Users
    Users unfamiliar with CPU frequency scaling and governors might face a learning curve in understanding how to optimally use the applet.
  • Possible Overhead
    While generally lightweight, running additional applets can add a slight overhead to system resources, which might be a consideration for users on low-resource systems.

Geekbench features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    Geekbench supports various platforms including Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, and Android, allowing users to benchmark a wide range of devices and compare performance across different ecosystems.
  • Comprehensive Benchmarking
    Offers CPU and GPU benchmarking, providing detailed insights into single-core and multi-core performance, as well as the computational power of the graphics hardware.
  • Ease of Use
    The user interface is straightforward and intuitive, making it easy for both novices and professionals to conduct performance tests.
  • Consistent Updates
    Regular updates ensure that the benchmarking software keeps up with the latest hardware and industry standards.
  • Detailed Reports
    Generates detailed reports that break down performance metrics, making it easier to identify strengths and weaknesses.

Possible disadvantages of Geekbench

  • Paid Version for Advanced Features
    While the basic version is free, advanced features such as command-line tools and extensive customization options are locked behind a paid version.
  • Limited Testing Scenarios
    Focuses primarily on synthetic benchmarks, which may not fully represent real-world performance in all scenarios.
  • Occasional Inaccuracies
    Some users have reported inconsistencies in benchmark results, which could be due to a variety of factors including background processes and thermal throttling.
  • Performance Impact
    Running benchmarks can significantly impact system performance temporarily, making the device less responsive during the test.
  • No Real-world Workloads
    Doesn't cover real-world application benchmarks like gaming or professional software, limiting its scope for specific use-case evaluations.

CPU Frequency Selector videos

No CPU Frequency Selector videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Geekbench videos

GeekBench Review

More videos:

  • Review - Geekbench 5 Benchmark | 5 Things I Learned
  • Review - Mid 2010 Core i7 Quad Core iMac Review + Geekbench Benchmark

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CPU Frequency Selector and Geekbench)
Monitoring Tools
59 59%
41% 41
Device Management
48 48%
52% 52
System Information
56 56%
44% 44
Utilities
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CPU Frequency Selector and Geekbench. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare CPU Frequency Selector and Geekbench

CPU Frequency Selector Reviews

We have no reviews of CPU Frequency Selector yet.
Be the first one to post

Geekbench Reviews

20 Programs to Analyze and Benchmark Your Hardware
Another popular benchmarking tool is Geekbench, by Primate Labs. This is has also been around for a long time, but in the past, it's also had its fair share of negative criticism, notably by key industry figure Linus Torvalds. That said, it was one of the very few testing programs that's available for all 5 major platforms: Windows, Linux, MacOS, Android, and iOS.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Geekbench seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CPU Frequency Selector mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CPU Frequency Selector yet. Tracking of CPU Frequency Selector recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Geekbench mentions (2)

  • New Build (Core i5-11600k & arc a770 16gb)
    i5-11600k single core speed is 1661, multi-core is 7873. 5600x single core speed is 1611 and multi-core is 8129. The 5600x is faster in multi-core by 3.2 percent. The i5-12400F single core is 1630, multi-core is 8105. It really depends on cost and what you wanted to do. The quality of the motherboard also makes a difference. Generally the user experience for a few percentage points of difference in cpu... Source: about 2 years ago
  • Apple announces new Macs with its most powerful chips yet
    If all you want to do is run Geekbench in single core mode, according to geekbench.com, the highest Apple is 1900, while the highest Intel is 2239. Source: over 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CPU Frequency Selector and Geekbench, you can also consider the following products

Udev Discover - A helping tool for udev testers, coders, hackers and consumers.

AIDA64 - AIDA64 is a system information, diagnostics and benchmarking solution for Windows PC.

PC Wizard - THIS SOFTWARE IS NO LONGER MAINTAINED.PC-Wizard is an utility designed to analyze and benchmark your computer system. CPU and memory subsystem (caches, RAM ...). Graphics and video. Hard disks, CD/DVD, Removable/FLASH medias.

Novabench - NovaBench is a piece of analytical software that works to test the various limits of your computer. The software is completely free to use, and it runs at a lightning-fast pace. Read more about Novabench.

HeavyLoad - The individual test methods employed by HeavyLoad can be customized to fit your needs.

Cinebench - CINEBENCH is a real-world test suite that evaluates your computer's performance capabilities.