Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CPU Frequency Selector VS Battle Encoder Shirase

Compare CPU Frequency Selector VS Battle Encoder Shirase and see what are their differences

CPU Frequency Selector logo CPU Frequency Selector

Cinnamon CPU Frequency Selector Applet

Battle Encoder Shirase logo Battle Encoder Shirase

Software that controls per-process CPU usage: an “active” software CPU cooler.
  • CPU Frequency Selector Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-22
  • Battle Encoder Shirase Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-15

CPU Frequency Selector features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    The Cinnamon CPU Frequency Selector applet provides a user-friendly interface for managing CPU frequency, making it accessible for users who prefer a GUI over command-line tools.
  • Fine-Grained Control
    It allows users to manually set the CPU frequency or choose between different governors, giving fine-grained control over performance and power consumption.
  • Integration with Cinnamon
    The applet integrates seamlessly with the Cinnamon desktop environment, offering a consistent user experience and an aesthetic that's familiar to Cinnamon users.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source, the applet is free to use, and users can modify it to fit their needs or contribute to its development.
  • Real-Time Information
    Users can view real-time information about CPU frequency and governor status directly from the applet, helping them make informed decisions about their CPU's performance.

Possible disadvantages of CPU Frequency Selector

  • Limited to Cinnamon
    The applet is specifically designed for the Cinnamon desktop environment, which limits its usability for those using other desktop environments.
  • Potential Stability Issues
    As with any software that alters system settings, there is a potential risk of stability issues or system crashes if not used properly.
  • Dependency on System Compatibility
    The effectiveness and functionality of the applet can depend on the compatibility of the underlying hardware and kernel with CPU frequency scaling.
  • Learning Curve for New Users
    Users unfamiliar with CPU frequency scaling and governors might face a learning curve in understanding how to optimally use the applet.
  • Possible Overhead
    While generally lightweight, running additional applets can add a slight overhead to system resources, which might be a consideration for users on low-resource systems.

Battle Encoder Shirase features and specs

  • CPU Limiting
    BES allows users to limit the CPU usage of specific applications, helping to prevent them from consuming too much processing power and potentially slowing down the system.
  • Freeware
    The software is available for free, making it accessible to users without any cost barrier.
  • Lightweight
    BES has a small footprint which means it does not use a lot of system resources and is easy to install and run.
  • User-Controlled
    Users have the ability to control how much CPU time an application receives, giving them flexibility in managing system performance.

Possible disadvantages of Battle Encoder Shirase

  • Limited Functionality
    BES is primarily focused on limiting CPU usage and doesn’t provide other performance management features like RAM or network bandwidth control.
  • Usability
    The user interface can be confusing for beginners and may require some time to fully understand how to use the software effectively.
  • Potential Instability
    Incorrectly configuring BES can lead to application instability, crashes, or degraded performance if the CPU is not adequately allocated.
  • Manual Management
    Users must manually configure the CPU limiting process for each application, which can be time-consuming especially for those with many applications requiring management.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CPU Frequency Selector and Battle Encoder Shirase)
Monitoring Tools
55 55%
45% 45
Device Management
100 100%
0% 0
Command Line Tools
0 0%
100% 100
System Information
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using CPU Frequency Selector and Battle Encoder Shirase. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CPU Frequency Selector and Battle Encoder Shirase, you can also consider the following products

Udev Discover - A helping tool for udev testers, coders, hackers and consumers.

Kiwi application monitor - Kiwi application monitor is a small program which lets you monitor your applications/processes, Windows and User activity.

HeavyLoad - The individual test methods employed by HeavyLoad can be customized to fit your needs.

KillSwitch - KillSwitch is an advanced system monitoring tool that is apart of

PC Wizard - THIS SOFTWARE IS NO LONGER MAINTAINED.PC-Wizard is an utility designed to analyze and benchmark your computer system. CPU and memory subsystem (caches, RAM ...). Graphics and video. Hard disks, CD/DVD, Removable/FLASH medias.

Security Process Explorer - Security Process Explorer Give you detailed information about each and every process.