Cppcheck Reviews

Skuuudle Reviews

1. Chris Burton

   | Head of eCommerce and Marketplace at J Rosenthal & Sons. | over 4 years ago
   Superb Company - Great service and insightful results.

   Skuuudle are a superb company to deal with. Whoever I have dealt with has always taken the time to understand my requirements in great detail. The QC process and all communications from various points of contact within the company are first class in terms of accuracy and guidance. I have used the services of Skuuudle for 6+ years now and would be happy to recommend. Matt Boudin who has been my recent point of contact has continued with excellent advice and customer service. The data provided my Skuuudle services is accurate, on time and incredibly reliable.

   👍 Pros:    Good price|Fast support|Great customer support|Easy to track data

   👎 Cons:    None
2. Daniel Prendergast

   | Director at The Rug Seller | over 4 years ago
   Professional Service

   Really professional and helpful team at Skuuudle. First class service and cost effective.

   👍 Pros:    Professional|Cost effective|Helpful|Knowledgable
3. Steven Woodcock

   | Head of Ecommerce at Maidenhead Aquatics | over 4 years ago
   Great Service

   Great service from Skuuudle, the report is always accurate and the team are really helpful. Great o review products in bulk if infrequent, which is currently what we are using them for.

   🏁 Competitors: Price2Spy

   👍 Pros:    Customer support|Accurate

   👎 Cons:    Dashboard still in development

Cppcheck mentions (10)

• Configuring Cppcheck, Cpplint, and JSON Lint

  I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

• Enforcing Memory Safety?

  Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code. Source: about 1 year ago

• Static Code analysis

  For my own projects, I used cppcheck. You can check out that tool to get a feel. Depending on what industry your in, you might need to follow a standard like Misra. Source: about 1 year ago

• How do you not shoot yourself in the foot ?

  Https://cppcheck.sourceforge.io/ (there are many other static analysis tools, I just haven't used them or didn't care for them). Source: about 1 year ago

• Linting tool for prohibiting the use of specific std types

  Sounds like something that could simply be communicated with the team that writes the tests. Unless you have dozens of such classes. In that case, you could just use e.g. Cppcheck and add a rule (regular expression) that searches for usages of the forbidden classes. Source: over 1 year ago

Skuuudle mentions (1)

• Pricing / competitor analysis

  You can look at tools like Skuuudle and PriceShape if you really want to get into pricing with clients. Source: about 1 year ago