Software Alternatives & Reviews

Cppcheck VS CoreOS Clair

Compare Cppcheck VS CoreOS Clair and see what are their differences

Cppcheck logo Cppcheck

Cppcheck is an analysis tool for C/C++ code. It detects the types of bugs that the compilers normally fail to detect. The goal is no false positives. CppCheckDownload cppcheck for free.

CoreOS Clair logo CoreOS Clair

Open-source container vulnerability analysis service.
  • Cppcheck Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-13
  • CoreOS Clair Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-26

Cppcheck videos

Cppcheck

More videos:

  • Review - Daniel Marjamäki: Cppcheck, static code analysis

CoreOS Clair videos

No CoreOS Clair videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Cppcheck and CoreOS Clair)
Code Analysis
75 75%
25% 25
Code Collaboration
0 0%
100% 100
Code Coverage
100 100%
0% 0
Code Review
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Cppcheck and CoreOS Clair. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Cppcheck and CoreOS Clair

Cppcheck Reviews

Top 9 C++ Static Code Analysis Tools
Cppcheck is a popular, open-source, free, cross-platform static code analysis tool dedicated to C and C++. It is known for being easy to use and its simplicity is one of its pros. To get started with it you don’t have to do any adjustments or modifications, which is why it’s often recommended for beginners. It also has a reputation of reporting a relatively small number of...

CoreOS Clair Reviews

We have no reviews of CoreOS Clair yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CoreOS Clair should be more popular than Cppcheck. It has been mentiond 15 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Cppcheck mentions (10)

  • Configuring Cppcheck, Cpplint, and JSON Lint
    I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Enforcing Memory Safety?
    Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code. Source: 11 months ago
  • Static Code analysis
    For my own projects, I used cppcheck. You can check out that tool to get a feel. Depending on what industry your in, you might need to follow a standard like Misra. Source: about 1 year ago
  • How do you not shoot yourself in the foot ?
    Https://cppcheck.sourceforge.io/ (there are many other static analysis tools, I just haven't used them or didn't care for them). Source: about 1 year ago
  • Linting tool for prohibiting the use of specific std types
    Sounds like something that could simply be communicated with the team that writes the tests. Unless you have dozens of such classes. In that case, you could just use e.g. Cppcheck and add a rule (regular expression) that searches for usages of the forbidden classes. Source: over 1 year ago
View more

CoreOS Clair mentions (15)

  • I looked through attacks in my access logs. Here's what I found
    Besides pointing pentester tools like metasploit at yourself, there are some nice scanners out there. https://github.com/quay/clair. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • General Docker Troubleshooting, Best Practices & Where to Go From Here
    Clair. Vulnerability Static Analysis for Containers. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Open source container scanning tool to find vulnerabilities and suggest best practice improvements?
    Https://github.com/quay/clair 9.4k stars, updated 17 hours ago. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Postgres: The Graph Database You Didn't Know You Had
    It scaled well compared to a naive graph abstraction implemented outside the database, but when performance wasn't great, it REALLY wasn't great. We ended up throwing it out in later versions to try and get more consistent performance. I've since worked on SpiceDB[1] which takes the traditional design approach for graph databases and simply treating Postgres as triple-store and that scales far better. IME, if you... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Implement DevSecOps to Secure your CI/CD pipeline
    Open source: Trivy, Gryp and Clair are widely used open source tools for container scanning. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Cppcheck and CoreOS Clair, you can also consider the following products

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

Checkmarx - The industry’s most comprehensive AppSec platform, Checkmarx One is fast, accurate, and accelerates your business.

Clang Static Analyzer - The Clang Static Analyzer is a source code analysis tool that finds bugs in C, C++, and Objective-C...

Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free

Appknox - Appknox is a cloud-based mobile app security solution to detect threats and vulnerabilities in the app.

PVS-Studio - PVS-Studio is a useful piece of software for detecting problems in source code. The software examines program codes written in C, C++, and C# for any problems that might prohibit the code from functioning properly.