Coveralls VS Gerrit Code Review

Coveralls mentions (13)

• GitHub Actions for Perl Development

  Cpan_coverage: This calculates the coverage of your test suite and reports the results. It also uploads the results to coveralls.io. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

• Perl Testing in 2023

  I will normally use GitHub Actions to automatically run my test suite on each push, on every major version of Perl I support. One of the test runs will load Devel::Cover and use it to upload test coverage data to Codecov and Coveralls. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• free-for.dev

  Coveralls.io — Display test coverage reports, free for Open Source. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• Containers for Coverage

  Several years ago I got into Travis CI and set up lots of my GitHub repos so they automatically ran the tests each time I committed to the repo. Later on, I also worked out how to tie those test runs into Coveralls.io so I got pretty graphs of how my test coverage was looking. I gave a talk about what I had done. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• Comprehensive coverage Jest+Playwright in Next.js TS

  This approach will create two json coverage files, which will be merged together by NYC. Therefore the results will be purely local. If You don't mind using online tools like Codecov or Coveralls for merging data from different tests, then go ahead and use them. They will probably also be more accurate. But if You still want to learn how to get coverage from E2E, then please read through. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

Gerrit Code Review mentions (0)