Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Corecon VS OpenID

Compare Corecon VS OpenID and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Corecon logo Corecon

Corecon offers integrated estimating, project management, and job costing for small to medium-sized construction companies.

OpenID logo OpenID

OpenID is a safe, faster and easier way to log in to web sites.
  • Corecon Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-29
  • OpenID Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-20

Corecon features and specs

  • Project Management Integration
    Corecon offers a comprehensive project management suite that ties together various construction processes including project planning, execution, and monitoring.
  • Cloud-Based Accessibility
    Being cloud-based, Corecon enables users to access data and manage projects from anywhere, facilitating remote work and collaboration.
  • Financial Management
    Corecon includes robust financial management features such as job costing, budgeting, and financial reporting which streamline accounting and financial oversight.
  • Mobile App
    Corecon provides a mobile app that allows for field data capture, timekeeping, and access to project information on the go.
  • Integration with Other Software
    Corecon can integrate with a variety of other software systems, such as QuickBooks and Microsoft Project, which enhances its usefulness in diverse IT environments.
  • Document Management
    Corecon's document management capabilities allow for centralized storage and easy retrieval of project documents, aiding in organization and compliance.
  • Customer Support
    The platform provides robust customer support including training and resources, helping users to maximize the software's features.

Possible disadvantages of Corecon

  • Complexity
    The comprehensive nature of Corecon can make it complex and overwhelming for new users, requiring a steep learning curve.
  • Cost
    Corecon can be expensive, especially for small businesses or individual contractors, both in terms of licensing fees and the potential need for additional training.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users have reported performance issues such as slow load times and occasional lag, which can hinder productivity.
  • Customization Limitations
    While Corecon offers various features, some users find that the customization options are limited and may not fully meet their specific workflow needs.
  • Initial Setup
    The initial setup and configuration of the software can be time-consuming and may require significant effort to tailor it to the specific needs of the business.
  • Interface Usability
    Some users report that the user interface is not as intuitive or user-friendly as they would like, leading to difficulties in navigation and use.

OpenID features and specs

  • Single Sign-On
    OpenID allows users to log into multiple websites using a single set of credentials, simplifying the login process and reducing password fatigue.
  • Decentralized Authentication
    OpenID operates in a decentralized manner, meaning users can choose their identity providers, giving them more control over their online identity.
  • Improved User Experience
    By reducing the number of times users need to enter login information, OpenID can streamline the user experience across different platforms.
  • Enhanced Privacy
    OpenID allows users to manage their identity, providing them with the option to share only necessary information with websites.
  • Increased Security through Reduced Password Usage
    With fewer passwords to remember and enter, users can focus on creating stronger passwords for their OpenID accounts, potentially increasing overall security.

Possible disadvantages of OpenID

  • Reliance on Identity Provider
    Users depend heavily on their chosen OpenID provider. If the provider experiences downtime or a security breach, user's ability to log in to various services can be impacted.
  • Complexity in Implementation
    Implementing OpenID can be complex and requires significant development resources, which might be a barrier for smaller websites or developers.
  • Potential Privacy Concerns
    Although OpenID enhances privacy, it also puts pressure on identity providers to manage and protect user data adequately. Any data mishandling can affect user privacy.
  • Fragmentation of Standards
    The existence of multiple identity standards and specifications can create confusion and compatibility issues, leading to a fragmented user experience.
  • Dependent on Internet Access
    Like many online authentication methods, OpenID requires constant internet access, which can be a limitation in regions with unstable internet connectivity.

Corecon videos

CoreCon Report: The Kamen Rider Box

OpenID videos

An Introduction To OpenID Connect

More videos:

  • Review - OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect (in plain English)
  • Review - What is Microsoft identity platform OpenID Connect certified? | One Dev Question: Hirsch Singhal

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Corecon and OpenID)
Construction
100 100%
0% 0
Identity And Access Management
Project Management
100 100%
0% 0
Security & Privacy
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Corecon and OpenID. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, OpenID seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Corecon mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Corecon yet. Tracking of Corecon recommendations started around Mar 2021.

OpenID mentions (3)

  • 4 Cognito User Pools features you might not know about
    Cognito User Pools is a fully managed, OpenID Connect-compatible identity provider. It serves as a user directory service that handles authentication and authorization for application users. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Top 7 API Authentication Methods Compared
    OpenID Connect builds on OAuth 2.0 by adding an identity layer, making it a go-to choice for applications that need both authentication and authorization. Developed by the OpenID Foundation, it's widely used by major players like Google, Microsoft, and Amazon. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Bluesky partners with Namecheap to power domains as usernames
    Certainly _buying_ domain names to be your identity is new, but OpenID[1] was doing basically that 15 years ago. Add a few meta tags to your website homepage, use that homepage as your "identity" to log in to websites, and they'd up your configured identity provider to do the login & request name/email/whatever else. You weren't locked in to a particular provider, since you logged in as _your_ webpage and could... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Corecon and OpenID, you can also consider the following products

Procore - Procore is the world's most widely used construction project management software. Easy to use, mobile platform with unlimited user licenses.

OAuth - OAuth is an open standard for authorization. It allows users to share their private resources (e.g.

CoConstruct - CoConstruct's project management software helps custom builders & remodelers coordinate projects, communicate with clients & crew, and control.

BugMeNot - BugMeNot is a free Internet service that provides usernames and passwords to allow users to bypass the registration process for websites.

BuilderTREND - Buildertrend is the #1 construction management software and construction app for home builders, remodelers, specialty contractors and commercial construction.

ASP.NET SAML - ASP.NET SAML is an open-source authentication utility that has been used for exchanging authentication and authorization data between the channels.