Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Contentbuilder.js VS Write.as

Compare Contentbuilder.js VS Write.as and see what are their differences

Contentbuilder.js logo Contentbuilder.js

Drag & Drop Feature for Content Editing in your Webapp/CMS .

Write.as logo Write.as

Publish a thought in seconds
  • Contentbuilder.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-05
  • Write.as Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-19

Contentbuilder.js features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    ContentBuilder.js offers a user-friendly drag-and-drop interface that allows users to create web content without needing extensive coding knowledge. This simplicity makes it accessible for beginners and efficient for experienced developers.
  • Real-Time Editing
    The real-time editing feature allows users to see changes instantly as they make edits, providing immediate feedback and facilitating quicker iterations and adjustments.
  • Flexible Design Options
    The tool provides a wide range of customizable templates and design elements, enabling users to tailor their content to specific needs and aesthetics.
  • Responsive Design Support
    ContentBuilder.js supports responsive design, ensuring that content is optimized for viewing on various devices and screen sizes, which is crucial in today’s mobile-first environment.
  • Integration Capabilities
    The tool can be easily integrated into existing web applications, providing added functionality without the need to overhaul current systems.

Possible disadvantages of Contentbuilder.js

  • Limited Advanced Features
    While ContentBuilder.js covers basic content creation needs well, it may lack some advanced features and customizations that power users or developers might expect.
  • Potential Performance Issues
    Depending on the complexity of the content being created, some users might experience performance slowdowns, particularly if working with large or media-heavy pages.
  • Pricing Structure
    The costs associated with licensing or using ContentBuilder.js might be prohibitive for small businesses or individual developers, especially if ongoing subscriptions are involved.
  • Learning Curve for Customization
    Although basic use is straightforward, users aiming to implement more complex customizations may face a steeper learning curve, requiring additional time to master advanced functionalities.
  • Dependency on JavaScript
    ContentBuilder.js is heavily reliant on JavaScript, which may pose issues for users whose projects require minimal JavaScript use due to performance or compatibility concerns.

Write.as features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Write.as provides a minimalist and distraction-free writing experience, focusing solely on the content without the usual clutter of other blogging platforms.
  • Anonymity
    Users can post content anonymously, which is ideal for those who want to share thoughts without revealing their identity.
  • Privacy
    The platform emphasizes privacy, with no tracking, ads, or third-party cookies, giving users peace of mind.
  • Markdown Support
    Write.as uses Markdown for formatting, making it easy for users familiar with Markdown to format their posts quickly.
  • Speed
    The platform is lightweight and fast, ensuring a quick and seamless writing and reading experience.

Possible disadvantages of Write.as

  • Limited Features
    Due to its minimalist approach, it lacks many features found in other blogging platforms, such as custom themes, plugins, or advanced SEO tools.
  • Subscription Cost
    While Write.as offers a free version, some of the more desirable features, like custom domains and multiple blogs, require a paid subscription.
  • Customization
    Users have limited options for customizing the appearance of their blogs, which might be a drawback for those who want a highly personalized site.
  • Limited Community Interaction
    Unlike some other blogging platforms, Write.as does not have features like comments or community engagement tools out of the box.
  • Learning Curve with Markdown
    Users unfamiliar with Markdown may find it challenging to format their posts initially, requiring a learning curve.

Contentbuilder.js videos

No Contentbuilder.js videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Write.as videos

Write.as & Why I Use elementary OS

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Contentbuilder.js and Write.as)
CMS
9 9%
91% 91
Blogging
7 7%
93% 93
Development
100 100%
0% 0
Blogging Platform
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Contentbuilder.js and Write.as. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Contentbuilder.js and Write.as

Contentbuilder.js Reviews

We have no reviews of Contentbuilder.js yet.
Be the first one to post

Write.as Reviews

25+ Medium Alternative Platforms for Publishing Articles
Write.as is a proprietary blogging platform for people who love to write and have no intentions of building a brand. Anonymous writers can hide their identity via the service, which only holds on to minimal information about its publishers. This new system weeds away marketers or those who want to build perception, so if you just enjoy the joy of writing without worrying...
Source: forgefusion.io
9 Best Medium Alternatives for Making Money With Your Writing in 2023
Write.as offers a clean, ultra-minimalistic, and ad-free user experience where the content takes center stage. Even the author can take a backseat, as one of the main features of the platform is anonymous posting without creating an account. That said, account-less posts only stay live for 1 hour.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Write.as seems to be a lot more popular than Contentbuilder.js. While we know about 57 links to Write.as, we've tracked only 1 mention of Contentbuilder.js. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Contentbuilder.js mentions (1)

Write.as mentions (57)

  • Show HN: LinkedIn sucks, so I built a better one
    There's a ton of those platforms, varying from extremely unknown to fairly well established. I'm pretty sure multiple of them end up as a Show HN every year. The only thing on your list they generally don't do is domain registration, but keeping that separate is generally a good thing. Sibling mentioned bearblog.dev, I'll mention write.as[1]. [1]: https://write.as/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • WriteFreely: An open source platform for building a writing space on the web
    I'd noticed some years back that this project seems to have started with a pretty strong anonymity story: https://write.as/ That seemed to diminish in emphasis a few years ago, stopped accepting accounts that didn't give you a credit card end of 2021, and some year recently (last year? I forget…) seemed as though the warrant canary missed a couple updates. (It's up to date now, with an assertion of no warrants... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • WriteFreely: An open source platform for building a writing space on the web
    From what I understand, Mastodon is to Twitter as WriteFreely is to WordPress.com/Medium/Blogger/etc. Fediverse-aware, open-source, with a flagship SaaS hosted instance available at https://write.as. If microblogging hadn't fried my brain and I was interested in spinning up a longform blog, this is the software I would choose. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • Researchers, please replace SQLite with DuckDB now
    Substack has problems too. For hosted foss services, write.as (https://write.as/) and bearblog (https://bearblog.dev/) are good. If self-hosting, the choices are infinite. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Link Building for Non-Scumbags: Build Authority Without Being Awful
    Take the site write.as, for instance, which has a 70 domain authority (Moz) and a 79 domain rating (Ahrefs).  Both of those are very high scores and represent the kind of links that would probably retail for at least $400 on the gray market for backlinks.  Write.as will happily give you as many of these as you want for $6 per month. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Contentbuilder.js and Write.as, you can also consider the following products

Mastodon - Mastodon is a decentralized, open source social network. This is just one part of the network, run by the main developers of the project It is not focused on any particular niche interest - everyone is welcome!

Ghost - Ghost is a fully open source, adaptable platform for building and running a modern online publication. We power blogs, magazines and journalists from Zappos to Sky News.

Blogger - Publish your passions, your way. Create a unique and beautiful blog. It’s easy and free.

WordPress - WordPress is web software you can use to create a beautiful website or blog. We like to say that WordPress is both free and priceless at the same time.

Twill - An open source CMS toolkit for Laravel.

Medium - Welcome to Medium, a place to read, write, and interact with the stories that matter most to you.