Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CompactView VS Apache TinkerPop

Compare CompactView VS Apache TinkerPop and see what are their differences

CompactView logo CompactView

Viewer for Microsoft® SQL Server® CE database files (sdf)

Apache TinkerPop logo Apache TinkerPop

Apache TinkerPop is a graph computing framework for both graph databases (OLTP) and graph analytic systems (OLAP).
  • CompactView Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-23
  • Apache TinkerPop Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-24

CompactView features and specs

  • Free and Open Source
    CompactView is open-source software available for free, allowing users to download, modify, and distribute the software without any cost.
  • Lightweight
    The software is lightweight, ensuring that it doesn't consume much system resources and runs efficiently even on older hardware.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    CompactView provides a simple and intuitive interface, making it easy for users to navigate and utilize its features without a steep learning curve.
  • Portable Application
    It is a portable application, meaning that it doesn't require installation and can be run from a USB drive, making it convenient for mobile use.
  • Focused on Specific Task
    CompactView focuses on a specific task, which is viewing Microsoft Compacted Files, providing great performance and reliability for this purpose.

Possible disadvantages of CompactView

  • Limited Features
    The software is designed primarily to view compacted files and lacks advanced editing or conversion features that some users might require.
  • Windows-Only
    CompactView is only available for Windows operating systems, making it inaccessible to macOS or Linux users without additional software like Wine.
  • No Active Support
    Being an open-source project, it may lack active customer support, relying instead on community forums for assistance.
  • Outdated Interface
    The interface may seem outdated compared to modern software, which could be off-putting to users accustomed to contemporary design aesthetics.
  • Potential Compatibility Issues
    Since it's dependent on Windows, certain updates or system configurations may lead to compatibility issues unless correctly managed.

Apache TinkerPop features and specs

  • Graph Abstraction
    Apache TinkerPop provides a generalized graph computing framework, allowing developers to work with a property graph model that supports both OLTP and OLAP use cases.
  • Gremlin Query Language
    Gremlin is a powerful and flexible graph traversal language that supports both imperative and declarative query styles, making it versatile for complex graph queries.
  • Vendor Neutrality
    TinkerPop is vendor-agnostic and supports multiple graph database systems such as Neo4j, JanusGraph, and Amazon Neptune, providing flexibility in choosing underlying storage.
  • Rich Ecosystem
    TinkerPop has a strong ecosystem with numerous integrations, plugins, and extensions, which helps in building applications more efficiently.
  • Community and Support
    Being part of the Apache Software Foundation, TinkerPop benefits from a strong community, extensive documentation, and regular updates.

Possible disadvantages of Apache TinkerPop

  • Complexity
    The flexibility and power of TinkerPop come with a steep learning curve, especially for those new to graph databases or the Gremlin language.
  • Performance Overhead
    Due to its abstraction layer, there might be performance overhead compared to using a graph database's native query language directly.
  • Limited Graph Algorithms
    Compared to specialized graph processing frameworks like Apache Giraph or GraphX, TinkerPop might have limitations in built-in graph algorithms.
  • Integration Overhead
    Integrating TinkerPop with existing systems may require additional overhead in terms of setup and configuration, especially if leveraging its multi-database support.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CompactView and Apache TinkerPop)
Databases
68 68%
32% 32
NoSQL Databases
66 66%
34% 34
Graph Databases
0 0%
100% 100
Development
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using CompactView and Apache TinkerPop. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache TinkerPop seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CompactView mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CompactView yet. Tracking of CompactView recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Apache TinkerPop mentions (5)

  • All About Graph RAG
    Part of the Apache TinkerPop framework, an imperative graph traversal language for the property graph model. - Source: dev.to / 15 days ago
  • Setup Azure Cosmos DB for Gremlin in Spring Boot Java
    The API for Gremlin is built based on Apache TinkerPop, a graph computing framework that uses the Gremlin query language. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Testcontainers
    You might take a look at Tinkerpop: https://tinkerpop.apache.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Getting Started with Redis and RedisGraph
    Property Graph, mainly represented as node and relationship in which they can have properties. The database for this kind of data is usually called Graph Database. Gremlin - by TinkerPop project and Cypher - by Neo4J are their query language (also AQL - Arango Query Language - by ArangoDB, but AQL does not only provides graph query language). - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • Should You Invent a New Query Language? (Probably Not)
    The most common graph query language at the moment would be Gremlin, which is part of the Apache TinkePop graph computing framework. It is simple to write, easy to learn, and widely supported by many graph databases and even non-graph databases that can emulate graph queries. On the other hand, it can be verbose for long queries but generally works well for both OLTP and analysis work. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CompactView and Apache TinkerPop, you can also consider the following products

Microsoft SQL Server Compact - Bring Microsoft SQL Server 2017 to the platform of your choice. Use SQL Server 2017 on Windows, Linux, and Docker containers.

neo4j - Meet Neo4j: The graph database platform powering today's mission-critical enterprise applications, including artificial intelligence, fraud detection and recommendations.

Realm.io - Realm is a mobile platform and a replacement for SQLite & Core Data. Build offline-first, reactive mobile experiences using simple data sync.

JanusGraph - JanusGraph is a scalable graph database optimized for storing and querying graphs.

ObjectBox - ObjectBox empower edge computing with an edge device database and synchronization solution for Mobile & IoT. Store and sync data from edge to cloud.

Ontotext Graph DB - Graph DB is a semantic graph database that serves organizations to store, organize and manage content.