Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Codeship VS Browxy

Compare Codeship VS Browxy and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Codeship logo Codeship

Codeship is a fast and secure hosted Continuous Delivery platform that scales with your needs.

Browxy logo Browxy

Browxy is a web application that serves as an integrated development environment where you can write in coding languages, compile them or edit them.
  • Codeship Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-19
Not present

Codeship features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Codeship offers an intuitive interface that simplifies the setup process, making it accessible for developers who may not be experienced with continuous integration (CI) and continuous deployment (CD) tools.
  • Integration with Cloud Services
    Codeship integrates seamlessly with cloud services such as AWS, Google Cloud, and Heroku, facilitating easy deployment of applications.
  • Flexible Workflows
    The tool provides support for both Codeship Basic and Codeship Pro, allowing for flexibility in choosing between a more straightforward or a more customizable CI/CD workflow.
  • Docker Support
    Codeship Pro offers extensive support for Docker, allowing developers to use containerization strategies for their build and deployment processes.
  • Parallel Test Pipelines
    It supports parallel test pipelines, which can significantly speed up the testing process and reduce build times.
  • Slack Integration
    Codeship integrates with communication tools like Slack, enabling notifications and updates directly within team communication channels.

Possible disadvantages of Codeship

  • Cost
    Codeship can be more expensive compared to other CI/CD tools, particularly for larger teams or more complex projects that require more build resources.
  • Limited Customization
    For highly customized CI/CD processes, Codeship Basic might be limiting. Users may need to switch to Codeship Pro, which requires more configuration and a steeper learning curve.
  • Performance Bottlenecks
    Users have reported occasional performance bottlenecks, particularly under heavy workloads, which can slow down the CI/CD pipeline.
  • Plugin Ecosystem
    The plugin ecosystem for Codeship is not as extensive as some other CI/CD tools like Jenkins, potentially limiting its integration capabilities.
  • Learning Curve
    While Codeship Basic is relatively easy to use, Codeship Pro has a steeper learning curve, particularly for users who are new to Docker and advanced CI/CD practices.
  • Support
    Although support is available, some users have reported slower response times and less comprehensive support compared to other CI/CD platforms.

Browxy features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Browxy provides a simple, user-friendly interface that allows users to quickly write, compile, and run Java code directly from their web browser without the need for local installations.
  • Web-Based Access
    As a web-based IDE, Browxy can be accessed from any device with a browser and internet connection, making it convenient for users to code on-the-go.
  • No Installation Required
    Browxy eliminates the need for downloading or installing software, which is beneficial for users with limited system permissions or storage.
  • Support for Multiple Languages
    In addition to Java, Browxy supports several other programming languages, allowing users to work on a diverse range of projects.
  • Code Sharing
    Browxy allows users to easily share code snippets or entire projects via URLs, facilitating collaboration and code review.

Possible disadvantages of Browxy

  • Limited Features
    Compared to full-fledged desktop IDEs, Browxy may lack some advanced features such as extensive debugging tools, plugins, and comprehensive customization options.
  • Internet Dependency
    Browxy requires an active internet connection to function, which can be a limitation in areas with poor connectivity or for offline development.
  • Performance Constraints
    Being a web-based tool, Browxy might experience performance limitations, particularly with larger projects or more resource-intensive tasks that could benefit from local execution.
  • Security Concerns
    Running code in a cloud-based environment may raise security and privacy concerns, especially when handling sensitive or proprietary code.
  • Java-Centric Environment
    While it supports multiple languages, Browxy is primarily Java-centric, which might not be ideal for developers focusing on other languages or ecosystems.

Codeship videos

LinuxFest Northwest 2017: Continuous Delivery to Microsoft Azure with Docker through Codeship

More videos:

  • Review - The Codeship -- Continuous Deployment made simple

Browxy videos

No Browxy videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Codeship and Browxy)
DevOps Tools
100 100%
0% 0
JavaScript
0 0%
100% 100
Continuous Integration
100 100%
0% 0
Design Playground
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Codeship and Browxy. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Codeship and Browxy

Codeship Reviews

The Best Alternatives to Jenkins for Developers
Codeship, a CI/CD platform based in the cloud, has an interface that is easy for users and it can integrate with numerous tools and services people are familiar with. It works well for different programming languages and platforms, which makes it suitable for many teams involved in development work.
Source: morninglif.com
Top 10 Most Popular Jenkins Alternatives for DevOps in 2024
CodeShip is a CloudBees SaaS platform that provides a managed CI/CD experience in the cloud. It’s designed to give control back to developers by providing a guided workflow for creating and maintaining CI/CD pipelines. This avoids much of the complexity that’s associated with Jenkins.
Source: spacelift.io
10 Jenkins Alternatives in 2021 for Developers
You could consider using CodeShip to help you to optimize CI/CD cloud deployment. CodeShip can be used by just about any type of development team that looks to increase the efficiency and automation of their code delivery. You can get started within minutes and gain access to an incredible amount of control when setting everything up. The customization options will seem...
The Best Alternatives to Jenkins for Developers
CodeShip is a hosted continuous integration and continuous delivery platform found by CloudBees. It provides fast feedback and customized environments to build applications. It provides integration with almost anything and is good at helping you scale as per your needs. It comes free for up to 100 monthly builds.

Browxy Reviews

We have no reviews of Browxy yet.
Be the first one to post

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Codeship and Browxy, you can also consider the following products

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

myCompiler - Run your favourite programming languages online

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

CodeChef IDE - CodeChef IDE is a free online tool for developers helping them in writing codes and programs.

Travis CI - Simple, flexible, trustworthy CI/CD tools. Join hundreds of thousands who define tests and deployments in minutes, then scale up simply with parallel or multi-environment builds using Travis CI’s precision syntax—all with the developer in mind.

Workat Tech IDE - Workat Tech IDE is a web application that enables any internet user to write codes in many programming languages and to run, save, and share them.