Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CodeGuard VS FitNesse

Compare CodeGuard VS FitNesse and see what are their differences

CodeGuard logo CodeGuard

CodeGuard provides website backup, monitoring, and malware remediation services to small and medium businesses.

FitNesse logo FitNesse

FitNesse is a fully integrated standalone wiki and acceptance testing framework.
  • CodeGuard Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-12-27
  • FitNesse Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-01

CodeGuard videos

Is Hostgator Codeguard Worth it? (Review) | Hostgator Site Backup

More videos:

  • Tutorial - Codeguard Setup and Tour - HostGator Tutorial
  • Review - CodeGuard Startup Battlefield Presentation

FitNesse videos

No FitNesse videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CodeGuard and FitNesse)
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Testing
0 0%
100% 100
Log Management
100 100%
0% 0
Automated Testing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CodeGuard and FitNesse. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, FitNesse should be more popular than CodeGuard. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CodeGuard mentions (1)

  • Self hosted backup solution like codeguard.com
    I'm looking for a centralised backup solution that can be self hosted. I would like to configure it to backup remote SFTP directories and MySQL databases exactly like codeguard.com does. Ideally it should have a web interface. It doesn't seem like there is anything like this. I did find some solutions however they were designed to run on the client and sync back to S3 etc. It would be great if I could have a... Source: about 3 years ago

FitNesse mentions (3)

  • Is there a feasible preimage attack for any hash function today?
    (I notified the Martin and the FitNesse user mailing list about this back in 2010. I assume their threat model is that the default hash function is about the same as a closed office door - a request to stay out, or at least knock first - rather than a strong preventative measure.) "Uncle" Bob Martin's "FitNesse", see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FitNesse and http://fitnesse.org/ , uses its own hash function, at... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Why Gherkin (Cucumber, SpecFlow,…) Always Failed with UI Test Automation?
    Cucumber is not the first failed test framework that uses English-like syntax for automated testing (it may be for other uses, but definitely not real test automation). Do you still remember FitNesse (it was quite big about 10 years ago, an example here)? Now it is hardly mentioned. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • 10 Tips On How To Improve UI/UX Design of a Web Application
    In-house testing tools help you to differentiate what people say and what they actually do with a product by testing it. FitNesse and Bugwolf are pretty good at this. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CodeGuard and FitNesse, you can also consider the following products

Datadog - See metrics from all of your apps, tools & services in one place with Datadog's cloud monitoring as a service solution. Try it for free.

Cucumber - Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.

PagerDuty - Cloud based monitoring service

Robot framework - Robot Framework is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance...

Nagios - Complete monitoring and alerting for servers, switches, applications, and services

JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.