Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CodeFactor.io VS PyLint

Compare CodeFactor.io VS PyLint and see what are their differences

CodeFactor.io logo CodeFactor.io

Automated Code Review for GitHub & BitBucket

PyLint logo PyLint

Pylint is a Python source code analyzer which looks for programming errors.
  • CodeFactor.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-19
  • PyLint Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-22

CodeFactor.io features and specs

  • Real-time Code Review
    CodeFactor.io provides immediate feedback on code changes by performing real-time code reviews, which helps catch issues early in the development process.
  • Integration with Popular Platforms
    The platform offers seamless integration with popular version control systems like GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, allowing easy adoption into existing workflows.
  • Detailed Reports
    Generates detailed reports with clear metrics and actionable insights on code quality, helping teams understand and improve their codebase.
  • Automated Code Review
    Automates the code review process, saving developers time and ensuring consistency in code quality assessments.
  • Support for Multiple Languages
    Supports a wide range of programming languages, making it versatile for teams working with diverse technology stacks.

Possible disadvantages of CodeFactor.io

  • Limited Free Plan
    The free plan has limitations in terms of features and the number of private repositories it can support, which may not be sufficient for larger teams or projects.
  • False Positives/Negatives
    Like many automated code review tools, CodeFactor.io can sometimes generate false positives or negatives, which might require manual inspection.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users have reported performance issues, such as slow analysis times, especially with very large codebases.
  • Learning Curve
    Although the interface is user-friendly, there can be a learning curve associated with interpreting some of the more detailed metrics and reports.
  • Customization Limitations
    The level of customization in the analysis rules and settings can be limited compared to some other code quality tools, potentially restricting its adaptability to specific team needs.

PyLint features and specs

  • Extensive Error Checking
    PyLint provides comprehensive checks for errors in Python code, including syntax errors, structural problems, and more complex issues like unused variables and undefined names.
  • Customizability
    PyLint allows users to configure which types of errors and warnings they want to check for through configuration files, making it adaptable to different coding standards and preferences.
  • Integration with Development Tools
    PyLint can be integrated with various IDEs and editors such as Visual Studio Code, PyCharm, and more, enhancing the development workflow by providing real-time feedback.
  • Code Quality Metrics
    It offers additional metrics and ratings for code quality, helping developers understand the complexity and maintainability of their code.
  • Code Refactoring Support
    PyLint suggests specific code improvements and refactorings, which can enhance the readability and performance of the code.

Possible disadvantages of PyLint

  • Performance Overhead
    Analyzing large codebases can be slow with PyLint, impacting performance and increasing the time taken for continuous integration pipelines to run.
  • False Positives
    PyLint can generate false positive warnings, particularly in complex or dynamically-typed code, which might lead to developers spending time investigating non-issues.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    The initial setup and configuration of PyLint can be challenging for new users who are not familiar with its extensive customization options.
  • Strictness
    PyLint is very strict by default, which might overwhelm developers, especially those working in less formal or rapid development environments, with a high volume of warnings and errors.
  • Compatibility Issues
    There might be compatibility issues with certain Python versions or specific coding patterns, leading to inaccurate linting results or the need for frequent adjustments to configurations.

CodeFactor.io videos

Getting started with CodeFactor.io

PyLint videos

Pylint Tutorial – How to Write Clean Python

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How to write pylint plugins

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CodeFactor.io and PyLint)
Code Coverage
58 58%
42% 42
Code Analysis
48 48%
52% 52
Code Quality
70 70%
30% 30
Code Review
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CodeFactor.io and PyLint. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare CodeFactor.io and PyLint

CodeFactor.io Reviews

We have no reviews of CodeFactor.io yet.
Be the first one to post

PyLint Reviews

7 best recommended IntelliJ IDEA Python plugins - Programmer Sought
As the name suggests, this plugin is a Python linter. It provides real-time and on-demand scanning of Python files with Pylint ideas from your Intellij. Pylint is an open source project, so it can be fully customized according to your needs. In addition, Pylint has a lot of documentation on the plugin website.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, PyLint seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 12 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CodeFactor.io mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CodeFactor.io yet. Tracking of CodeFactor.io recommendations started around Mar 2021.

PyLint mentions (12)

  • Nix Flake Templates
    Use pylint and flake8 for linting and static analysis. - Source: dev.to / about 3 hours ago
  • The Cloud Resume Challenge - GCP :)
    I used Pylint to perform basic test on the code and for the security bit I used snyk SCM to check for vulnerabilities within my code and it's dependencies. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • I'm being told that one of my projects on GitHub is poorly coded. Can anyone tell me why? The only thing I see ugly, not necessary wrong or poorly coded, is the two variables with the list of iPhone models, and the incredibly long if, elif, and else statements.
    Pylint - https://pylint.pycqa.org/en/latest/ Black - https://black.readthedocs.io/en/stable/. Source: over 2 years ago
  • API pull into pandas with formatting.
    Your code isn't PEP-8 compliant. Use black or autopep8 on your code to auto-format your code, or at least use pylint to check for issues, before asking anyone else to read your code. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • First time posting here wow
    Here's the pylint user manual if you're curious. Source: about 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CodeFactor.io and PyLint, you can also consider the following products

Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

PyCharm - Python & Django IDE with intelligent code completion, on-the-fly error checking, quick-fixes, and much more...

CodeClimate - Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.

Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free

SensioLabs Insight - PHP Project Quality Done Right.