Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CodeFactor.io VS FindBugs

Compare CodeFactor.io VS FindBugs and see what are their differences

CodeFactor.io logo CodeFactor.io

Automated Code Review for GitHub & BitBucket

FindBugs logo FindBugs

Findbugs is a tool that looks for bugs in Java code. Findbugs finds the bugs by analyzing computer software without actually executing programs. Using this software allows for easy debugging and repairing broken script. Read more about FindBugs.
  • CodeFactor.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-19
  • FindBugs Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-01-11

CodeFactor.io features and specs

  • Real-time Code Review
    CodeFactor.io provides immediate feedback on code changes by performing real-time code reviews, which helps catch issues early in the development process.
  • Integration with Popular Platforms
    The platform offers seamless integration with popular version control systems like GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, allowing easy adoption into existing workflows.
  • Detailed Reports
    Generates detailed reports with clear metrics and actionable insights on code quality, helping teams understand and improve their codebase.
  • Automated Code Review
    Automates the code review process, saving developers time and ensuring consistency in code quality assessments.
  • Support for Multiple Languages
    Supports a wide range of programming languages, making it versatile for teams working with diverse technology stacks.

Possible disadvantages of CodeFactor.io

  • Limited Free Plan
    The free plan has limitations in terms of features and the number of private repositories it can support, which may not be sufficient for larger teams or projects.
  • False Positives/Negatives
    Like many automated code review tools, CodeFactor.io can sometimes generate false positives or negatives, which might require manual inspection.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users have reported performance issues, such as slow analysis times, especially with very large codebases.
  • Learning Curve
    Although the interface is user-friendly, there can be a learning curve associated with interpreting some of the more detailed metrics and reports.
  • Customization Limitations
    The level of customization in the analysis rules and settings can be limited compared to some other code quality tools, potentially restricting its adaptability to specific team needs.

FindBugs features and specs

  • Open Source
    FindBugs is an open-source project, making it free to use and allowing developers to contribute to its development and improvement.
  • Static Code Analysis
    FindBugs performs static analysis of Java bytecode to identify potential defects and bugs without needing to execute the code.
  • Integration
    It integrates with popular development environments and build tools like Eclipse, IntelliJ IDEA, and Ant, which makes it easier to incorporate into existing workflows.
  • Java Specific
    It's specifically designed for Java, meaning it can detect issues unique to the Java programming language that may not be caught by general-purpose tools.
  • Defect Identification
    The tool can identify a wide range of bug patterns, including multithreading issues, performance problems, and bad coding practices.

Possible disadvantages of FindBugs

  • Limited Language Support
    FindBugs is limited to Java, so it does not support other programming languages, which can be a drawback for polyglot environments.
  • Project Activity
    As the project has not been actively maintained for several years, it may lack support for the latest Java features and language updates.
  • False Positives
    Like many static analysis tools, FindBugs can produce false positives, which may lead to unnecessary work to triage these non-issues.
  • Performance
    Analyzing large codebases can be time-consuming and may affect the overall performance during the analysis phase in a CI/CD pipeline.
  • User Interface
    The user interface of FindBugs is considered less modern compared to newer tools, which might lead to a steeper learning curve for new users.

CodeFactor.io videos

Getting started with CodeFactor.io

FindBugs videos

Static Code Analysis With FindBugs: Step By Step Tutorial

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CodeFactor.io and FindBugs)
Code Coverage
85 85%
15% 15
Code Analysis
80 80%
20% 20
Code Quality
85 85%
15% 15
Development
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using CodeFactor.io and FindBugs. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare CodeFactor.io and FindBugs

CodeFactor.io Reviews

We have no reviews of CodeFactor.io yet.
Be the first one to post

FindBugs Reviews

TOP 40 Static Code Analysis Tools (Best Source Code Analysis Tools)
A tool that helps in analyzing C/C++, Java, C#, RPG and Python codes. Another good thing about this tool is it allows integration with free static checker tools like cppcheck, PMD, FindBugs. Basic Version of this tool is free but it comes with fewer features. Based on the need, you can decide whether the free version satisfies the requirement or not.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, FindBugs seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CodeFactor.io mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CodeFactor.io yet. Tracking of CodeFactor.io recommendations started around Mar 2021.

FindBugs mentions (4)

  • Tutorial: Build a Java SDK based on OpenAPI Spec
    FindBugs: Detects potential issues in Java code that could lead to bugs. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Scanning for flaws?
    The tools generally depend on the programming language. You might be looking for something like a "linter" or static analyzer (i.e. FindBugs for Java). Source: over 3 years ago
  • Why we need multiple code analysis tools?
    These tools perform analysis on the application's source code without executing/running the code on a platform. In other words, a bot goes line by line of source code to find any bug defined by preconfigured policies/rules. It could be compared to manual code review, but the review is done by a bot. Mostly, code quality, coding standard aspects are targeted to be scanned. The biggest name in static code analysis... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • Review of Java Static Analysis Tools
    FindBugs looks for bugs in Java Code, and this means over 400 different bugs. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CodeFactor.io and FindBugs, you can also consider the following products

Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

CodeClimate - Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.

Pmd - PMD scans Java source code and looks for potential problems like:

SensioLabs Insight - PHP Project Quality Done Right.

SolidSDD - Duplicate Code Detector - Bluehost - Top rated web hosting provider - Free 1 click installs For blogs, shopping carts, and more.