Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CodeFactor.io VS Clang Static Analyzer

Compare CodeFactor.io VS Clang Static Analyzer and see what are their differences

CodeFactor.io logo CodeFactor.io

Automated Code Review for GitHub & BitBucket

Clang Static Analyzer logo Clang Static Analyzer

The Clang Static Analyzer is a source code analysis tool that finds bugs in C, C++, and Objective-C...
  • CodeFactor.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-19
  • Clang Static Analyzer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-28

CodeFactor.io features and specs

  • Real-time Code Review
    CodeFactor.io provides immediate feedback on code changes by performing real-time code reviews, which helps catch issues early in the development process.
  • Integration with Popular Platforms
    The platform offers seamless integration with popular version control systems like GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, allowing easy adoption into existing workflows.
  • Detailed Reports
    Generates detailed reports with clear metrics and actionable insights on code quality, helping teams understand and improve their codebase.
  • Automated Code Review
    Automates the code review process, saving developers time and ensuring consistency in code quality assessments.
  • Support for Multiple Languages
    Supports a wide range of programming languages, making it versatile for teams working with diverse technology stacks.

Possible disadvantages of CodeFactor.io

  • Limited Free Plan
    The free plan has limitations in terms of features and the number of private repositories it can support, which may not be sufficient for larger teams or projects.
  • False Positives/Negatives
    Like many automated code review tools, CodeFactor.io can sometimes generate false positives or negatives, which might require manual inspection.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users have reported performance issues, such as slow analysis times, especially with very large codebases.
  • Learning Curve
    Although the interface is user-friendly, there can be a learning curve associated with interpreting some of the more detailed metrics and reports.
  • Customization Limitations
    The level of customization in the analysis rules and settings can be limited compared to some other code quality tools, potentially restricting its adaptability to specific team needs.

Clang Static Analyzer features and specs

  • Integration with Clang
    The Clang Static Analyzer is built as part of the Clang project, ensuring seamless integration with the Clang compiler. This allows for easy adoption in projects that already use Clang for compiling, as there is no need for additional tooling setup.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source tool, Clang Static Analyzer is freely available for anyone to use and modify. This encourages a community-driven approach to improvements and provides the flexibility to tailor the tool to specific needs.
  • Path-sensitive Analysis
    Clang Static Analyzer performs path-sensitive analysis, which means it evaluates different execution paths in the code to detect complex bugs that may only manifest under certain conditions.
  • Deep C/C++ Support
    As part of the LLVM project, Clang Static Analyzer offers robust support for C and C++ languages, leveraging the deep language understanding from the Clang front-end.

Possible disadvantages of Clang Static Analyzer

  • Limited Language Support
    While it is excellent for C and C++, Clang Static Analyzer has limited support for other programming languages, which can be a drawback for projects involving multiple languages.
  • False Positives
    Like many static analysis tools, Clang Static Analyzer can generate false positives, where it reports issues that are not actual bugs. This can require developers to spend additional time reviewing and dismissing spurious warnings.
  • Complex Setup for Non-Clang Projects
    Projects that are not already using Clang might face a more complex setup process to integrate Clang Static Analyzer, as it requires adapting build configurations to use Clang.
  • Performance Overhead
    Running Clang Static Analyzer can introduce significant performance overhead during the analysis phase, which might lead to longer build or integration times, especially for large codebases.

CodeFactor.io videos

Getting started with CodeFactor.io

Clang Static Analyzer videos

2019 LLVM Developers’ Meeting: A. Dergachev “Developing the Clang Static Analyzer”

More videos:

  • Review - Clang Static Analyzer - Eduard Bachmakov, Linux Foundation (GSoC)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CodeFactor.io and Clang Static Analyzer)
Code Coverage
69 69%
31% 31
Code Analysis
54 54%
46% 46
Code Quality
100 100%
0% 0
Code Review
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CodeFactor.io and Clang Static Analyzer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Clang Static Analyzer seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CodeFactor.io mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CodeFactor.io yet. Tracking of CodeFactor.io recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Clang Static Analyzer mentions (7)

  • Improvements to static analysis in GCC 14
    Clang has a similar tool, the Clang Static Analyzer: https://clang-analyzer.llvm.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Memory Safe or Bust?
    Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment [CI/CD] pipelines play a crucial role in enforcing code quality, especially when working with memory-unsafe languages. By integrating automated dynamic analysis tools like Valgrind or AddressSanitizer, static analysis tools like Clang Static Analyzer or cppcheck, and manual code review processes, developers can identify and mitigate many memory-related... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Static Code analysis
    No one static analyzer catches everything. It's best to run multiple. Popular ones are cppcheck, clang-analyzer, GCC static analyzer in GCC 10+, flawfinder, lizard. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Checked C
    With "cross translation units" (CTU) analysis a static analyzer could derive a constraint on `some_function` return value and check this against the array size to detect a possible bug. The Clang static analyzer [1], used through CodeChecker (CC) [2], do support CTU (enabled with `--ctu`). I'm very happy with the result on the code I'm working on. Of course this is not magic, and it's important to understand the... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • What's in your tool belt?
    Cppcheck and Clang Analyzer: statically analyze your code to find bad style and bugs (undefined behavior) respectively. Clang Analyzer can actually be frighteningly clever and has a low false positive rate (unlike most other non-commercial static checkers). Source: almost 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CodeFactor.io and Clang Static Analyzer, you can also consider the following products

Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.

Cppcheck - Cppcheck is an analysis tool for C/C++ code. It detects the types of bugs that the compilers normally fail to detect. The goal is no false positives. CppCheckDownload cppcheck for free.

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

CodeClimate - Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.

Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free

SensioLabs Insight - PHP Project Quality Done Right.