Software Alternatives & Reviews

Codecov VS SBT

Compare Codecov VS SBT and see what are their differences

Codecov logo Codecov

Develop healthier code using Codecov's leading, dedicated code coverage solution. Try it free

SBT logo SBT

SBT is a build tool for Scala, like Ant or Maven but with hieroglyphics.
  • Codecov Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-07
  • SBT Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-02

Codecov videos

Bring Codecov data to your next code review Sourcegraph Codecov extension

More videos:

  • Review - Codecov and CircleCI Orbs: Making Code Coverage Easy
  • Review - C++ Weekly - Ep 90 - Using Codecov and Project Badges

SBT videos

Inside PWC Engine Remanufacturer SBT

More videos:

  • Review - review audio sound system milik youtuber ibnu sbt trenggalek horregg luuurrrrrr
  • Review - CEK SOUND & REVIEW SOUND OMAHAN YOUTUBER IBNU SBT TRENGGALEK

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Codecov and SBT)
Code Coverage
100 100%
0% 0
JS Build Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Code Analysis
100 100%
0% 0
Front End Package Manager

User comments

Share your experience with using Codecov and SBT. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Codecov and SBT

Codecov Reviews

11 Interesting Tools for Auditing and Managing Code Quality
Codecov is a comprehensive tool for managing code base as well as builds with a single utility. It analyses the pushed code, performs required checks, and auto-merges them if needed. Some of the more features listed below.
Source: geekflare.com

SBT Reviews

We have no reviews of SBT yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Codecov seems to be a lot more popular than SBT. While we know about 18 links to Codecov, we've tracked only 1 mention of SBT. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Codecov mentions (18)

  • To Review or Not to Review: The Debate on Mandatory Code Reviews
    If you're actively testing your codebase, which I hope you are, consider integrating a code coverage automatic checker such as codecov. This tool can alert if the coverage drops below a threshold. While I've had positive experiences with such tools, it's worth mentioning that the adoption process may pose some challenges. - Source: dev.to / 12 days ago
  • DevOps CI/CD Quick Start Guide with GitHub Actions 🛠️🐙⚡️
    The code coverage is printed out in the Coverage Report step but it is useful to track code coverage over time and have a repository badge which shows the current coverage percentage. There are many different code coverage and testing applications but we will use CodeCov. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Build an Open Source Project: Behind the Scenes
    Usually, you can't build a product without using various tools. Some of them can be free, and some of them can be commercial. The great benefit of working on Open Source projects is that a lot of companies with commercial products have special offers for non-commercial development. In the case of the "xq" utility, which is written in Go, I use GoLand IDE by JetBrains. I paid for it for several months but later... - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • CI CD strategies for UI apps and deployed services
    This YAML file details the CI implementation, including combined code coverage with CodeCov. For a simpler example without Cypress parallelization and code coverage, check the Github Actions YAML file of this template. The ideas presented here can be applied to any front-end application. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Almost 1000 applications this year, still no job.
    High unit-test coverage, and automated coverage reports on your repo by something like Codecov. Source: about 1 year ago
View more

SBT mentions (1)

  • Declarative Gradle is a cool thing I am afraid of: Maven strikes back
    NOTE: I won’t mention SBT and Leiningen here because, with all due respect, they are niche build tools. I also won’t discuss Kobalt for the same reason (besides, it’s no longer actively maintained). Additionally, I won’t touch upon Bazel and Buck in this context, mainly because I’m not very familiar with them. If you have insights or comments about these tools, please feel free to share them in the comments 👇. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Codecov and SBT, you can also consider the following products

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

CodeClimate - Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.