Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CodeClimate VS Invicti (formerly Netsparker)

Compare CodeClimate VS Invicti (formerly Netsparker) and see what are their differences

CodeClimate logo CodeClimate

Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.

Invicti (formerly Netsparker) logo Invicti (formerly Netsparker)

Netsparker Security Scanner is a simple-yet-powerful web-based security scanner that automatically identifies XSS, SQL Injection, and all the other vulnerabilities and security flaws in sites, web apps, and web services.
  • CodeClimate Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-04
  • Invicti (formerly Netsparker) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-12

CodeClimate videos

SaaS Chat: SaaSTV, the Affordable Care Act website, CodeClimate for code reviews

Invicti (formerly Netsparker) videos

No Invicti (formerly Netsparker) videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CodeClimate and Invicti (formerly Netsparker))
Code Coverage
100 100%
0% 0
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Code Analysis
100 100%
0% 0
Security
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CodeClimate and Invicti (formerly Netsparker). For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare CodeClimate and Invicti (formerly Netsparker)

CodeClimate Reviews

11 Interesting Tools for Auditing and Managing Code Quality
Code Climate is an analytics tool that is extremely useful for an organization that emphasizes quality. Code Climate offers two different products:
Source: geekflare.com

Invicti (formerly Netsparker) Reviews

10 Best Burp Suite Alternatives For Windows In 2023
Verdict: If you seek an alternative to Burp Suite, that is easy to set up, ideal for non-technical employees of your business, and facilitates automated proof-based scanning, then Invicti is for you. Its accurate and fast detection of vulnerabilities and advanced web crawling abilities make it a worthwhile vulnerability management tool to have by your side.
Best Burp Suite Alternatives (Free and Paid) for 2023
Vulnerability scanners software search, identify, and assess network and resources for known weaknesses. They discover all network access points and connected devices and then compare the scans’ findings to known vulnerabilities in a database. In short, these tools are a must-have for any organization. Companies must choose the right software to minimize data breaches and...

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CodeClimate seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 11 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CodeClimate mentions (11)

  • free-for.dev
    Codeclimate.com — Automated code review, free for Open Source and unlimited organisation-owned private repos (up to 4 collaborators). Also free for students and institutions. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • How To Use Code Climate To Improve Software Quality
    Want to know how to enforce allowing only high-quality software into production? Check out this post on how to use CodeClimate can help you do just that! #DevOps #SoftwareDeveloper #softwaredevelopment #SoftwareEngineering #webdevelopment #codequality. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • RFC: A Full-stack Analytics Platform Architecture
    Ideally, software can quickly go from development to production. Continuous deployment and delivery are some processes that make this possible. Continuous deployment means establishing an automated pipeline from development to production while continuous delivery means maintaining the main branch in a deployable state so that a deployment can be requested at any time. Predecos uses these tools. When a commit goes... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Adding coverage to CI pipeline?
    The new code should not drop existing code coverage I've found in practice mainly catches changes to existing code that lack proper updates to existing tests. Our company uses Code Climate for these checks, so we don't have to manage / write our own tooling for this purpose. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Node.js best practices list (July 2021)
    TL;DR: Using static analysis tools helps by giving objective ways to improve code quality and keeps your code maintainable. You can add static analysis tools to your CI build to fail when it finds code smells. Its main selling points over plain linting are the ability to inspect quality in the context of multiple files (e.g. Detect duplications), perform advanced analysis (e.g. Code complexity), and follow the... - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
View more

Invicti (formerly Netsparker) mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Invicti (formerly Netsparker) yet. Tracking of Invicti (formerly Netsparker) recommendations started around May 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CodeClimate and Invicti (formerly Netsparker), you can also consider the following products

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

Acunetix - Audit your website security and web applications for SQL injection, Cross site scripting and other...

Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.

Intruder - Intruder is a security monitoring platform for internet-facing systems.

ESLint - The fully pluggable JavaScript code quality tool

Horangi - Horangi is a leading cyber-security solution that provides instant response and threat detection for companies who lack the time and expertise to monitor their system.