Codacy VS Closure Compiler
Compare Codacy VS Closure Compiler and see what are their differences
The PAQATO After-Sales Experience Platform is the growth driver that makes online stores successful for tomorrow.
featured
Codacy
SonarQube
CodeClimate
CodeFactor.io
ESLint
Checkmarx
codebeat
Source Insight
Closure Compiler
JavaScript Obfuscator
Terser
UglifyJS
YUI Compressor
DomainLockJS
SonarQube
Coverity Scan
Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request reporting back the impact of every commit or pull request, issues concerning code style, best practices, security, and many others. It monitors changes in code coverage, code duplication and code complexity. Saving developers time in code reviews thus efficiently tackling technical debt. JavaScript, Java, Ruby, Scala, PHP, Python, CoffeeScript and CSS are currently supported. Codacy is static analysis without the hassle.
Codacy Closure CompilerBased on our record, Closure Compiler should be more popular than Codacy. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I'm trying to use Codacy to review my code. One of the issues is regarding the use of the "setcookie" function. Source: over 2 years ago
Does anyone have an example on how to get this conversion done on github actions where I can convert the *.coverage file into a *.xml file for uploading to codacy.com. Source: almost 3 years ago
Online analysisFinally, if you want a simple way to analyze your code without having to manually configure everything locally, you can use an online code review service such as Codacy (shameless plug here). We already integrate some of the mentioned detection tools in this article and we are working every day to improve the service. The other main benefit of using automated code review tools is to allow you to... - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
Because you care and because you always want to be better, automation is a great way to optimize your review workflow process. Go ahead and do a quick search on Google for automated code reviews and see who better fits your workflow. You'll find Codacy on your Google search and we hope you like what we do. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
I’m not exactly sure what you are trying to do but JavaScript Source Maps basically do this same thing with browsers and they use https://developers.google.com/closure/compiler/. Source: over 1 year ago
I'm using the Google Closure Compiler. I believe it has similar capabilities. Source: over 1 year ago
In a real world scenario you'd probably run the resulting JS through Closure Compiler. It would be nice to see how that affects both code size and performance. Source: over 1 year ago
Kind of funny that Google actually does have a product called the "Google Closure compiler". It creates different kinds of compilations though. https://developers.google.com/closure/compiler. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Partially, depending on what's used it also optimizes the javascript code. See Google's closure compiler for more info. Source: about 2 years ago
SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.
JavaScript Obfuscator - JavaScript Obfuscator is a free online tool that obfuscates your source code, preventing it from being stolen and used without permission.
CodeClimate - Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.
Terser - JavaScript parser, mangler, optimizer and beautifier toolkit for ES6+
CodeFactor.io - Automated Code Review for GitHub & BitBucket
UglifyJS - JavaScript minifier, beautifier, mangler and parser toolkit.