Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Coala VS Phabricator

Compare Coala VS Phabricator and see what are their differences

Setuply
Setuply: Transform Clients into Brand Advocates. An AI-powered, purpose-built platform for client onboarding and lifecycle management, helping B2B teams accelerate revenue recognition, boost retention, and scale operations with confidence. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Coala logo Coala

Linting and fixing code for all languages

Phabricator logo Phabricator

Phacility - Phabricator
  • Coala Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-17
  • Phabricator Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-13

Coala features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Phabricator features and specs

  • Comprehensive Toolset
    Phabricator offers a wide range of tools including code review, repository hosting, bug tracking, project management, and more, all integrated into one platform.
  • Customizability
    Users can customize workflows, forms, and other aspects to fit the specific needs of their projects.
  • Powerful Code Review
    Phabricator provides advanced code review features like inline comments, custom fields, and audit trails, making it a robust tool for maintaining code quality.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source, Phabricator allows organizations to host their instance, providing control over data and customizations without licensing fees.
  • Multi-repository Support
    It supports multiple version control systems (Git, Mercurial, and Subversion) and allows managing multiple repositories within the same project.

Possible disadvantages of Phabricator

  • Complex Setup
    Phabricator can be challenging to install and configure, requiring a good level of technical knowledge and infrastructure.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    New users might find it difficult to navigate and use all the features due to its extensive functionalities and less intuitive user interface.
  • Limited Third-Party Integrations
    Compared to other platforms, Phabricator has fewer integrations with third-party tools, which might be a limitation for some teams.
  • Dependency on Phacility's Future
    Phacility announced that they will cease operations, which means the future maintenance and updates of Phabricator could be uncertain.
  • Performance Issues
    For large-scale projects with many users and repositories, Phabricator may experience performance issues and could require significant resources to run smoothly.

Coala videos

+ Add

Coala Bag Review + Giveaways

More videos:

  • Review - Coala-Tatzen Review

Phabricator videos

+ Add

Phabricator code review session at Wikimedia Hackathon Zurich

More videos:

  • Review - Phabricator and Lando Brownbag July 2 2018
  • Review - Nizameddin Ordulu - Phabricator: An all-in-one tool for code review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Coala and Phabricator)

Coala

Phabricator

Code Analysis
100 100%
Code Analysis
0% 0
Code Collaboration
0 0%
Code Collaboration
100% 100
Code Coverage
100 100%
Code Coverage
0% 0
Git
0 0%
Git
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Coala and Phabricator. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Phabricator seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Coala mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Coala yet. Tracking of Coala recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Phabricator mentions (3)

  • Migrating from Phabricator to Azure Devops. Have some questions.
    My company has used Phabricator, which is an alternative to Azure Devops, for about 5 years. A few days ago they announced that the project won't be maintained anymore, so we are looking into alternatives. We have around 50 devs+product folks that use Phabricator at the moment. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • Is there any "Unified HUB SOlution" in this Microservices era?
    You also mention Gitlab is close to what you would like - maybe Phabricator is even closer: https://phacility.com/phabricator/. Source: about 4 years ago
  • Is there an alternative to open project with the next characteristics ?
    Https://phacility.com/phabricator/ I think checks most of those boxes, maybe all. Source: about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Coala and Phabricator, you can also consider the following products

Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.

GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab

PyLint - Pylint is a Python source code analyzer which looks for programming errors.

GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.

PyFlakes - A simple program which checks Python source files for errors.

BitBucket - Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.

Loading...