Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CMDBuild VS rxvt-unicode

Compare CMDBuild VS rxvt-unicode and see what are their differences

CMDBuild logo CMDBuild

CMDBuild is a web enterprise environment designed for asset and database management. It's a favorite among enterprises that need an advanced and secure organization solution for a great deal of files and applications... read more.

rxvt-unicode logo rxvt-unicode

5. 1 Transparency not working after upgrade to v9. 09; 5. 2 Remote hosts; 5. 3 Using rxvt-unicode as gmrun terminal; 5.
  • CMDBuild Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-29
  • rxvt-unicode Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-10-08

CMDBuild features and specs

  • Flexibility
    CMDBuild is highly customizable, allowing organizations to adapt the system to their specific needs, including the creation of custom workflows and data models.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source solution, CMDBuild allows for a lower total cost of ownership and the ability to inspect and modify the source code as needed.
  • Active Community
    It benefits from an active community and continuous updates, ensuring that users have access to the latest features and support.
  • Integration Capabilities
    CMDBuild offers various integration possibilities with other enterprise applications, enhancing its utility in complex IT environments.
  • Web-based Interface
    Its web-based interface allows for easy access and management from any device with internet access, providing flexibility in operations.

Possible disadvantages of CMDBuild

  • Complexity
    The high level of customization also means that CMDBuild can be complex to configure and maintain, requiring specialized knowledge and expertise.
  • Initial Setup Time
    Setting up CMDBuild for the first time can be time-consuming and may require a considerable amount of effort for detailed configuration.
  • Learning Curve
    Due to its flexibility and range of features, there can be a steep learning curve for new users, necessitating comprehensive training.
  • Performance
    Some users have reported performance issues when dealing with very large datasets, which may require additional optimization and hardware resources.
  • Support Limitations
    While there is an active community, official support might be limited or require a commercial agreement, which could be a drawback for some organizations.

rxvt-unicode features and specs

  • Lightweight
    rxvt-unicode is known for its low memory usage and minimal resource consumption, making it an efficient choice for systems with limited resources.
  • Unicode Support
    It provides robust support for Unicode, allowing it to handle a wide variety of character sets and languages, which is particularly useful for internationalization.
  • Customizability
    Users can extensively customize rxvt-unicode using X resources, allowing for a highly personalized terminal experience.
  • Perl Extensions
    rxvt-unicode supports Perl extensions, enabling advanced users to extend its functionality with custom scripts and plugins.
  • Transparency
    It supports pseudo-transparency, which can be visually appealing and useful for certain aesthetic purposes.
  • Performance
    rxvt-unicode is optimized for performance, providing a snappy and responsive experience even under heavy use.

Possible disadvantages of rxvt-unicode

  • Complex Configuration
    The extensive customizability, though a pro for advanced users, can be overwhelming and complex for beginners.
  • Limited Documentation
    Documentation can be sparse or difficult to navigate, which might pose challenges for users trying to fully leverage its capabilities.
  • Aging Codebase
    Some parts of the codebase are relatively old, which could potentially lead to maintainability issues or lack of modern features.
  • Less Beginner-Friendly
    rxvt-unicode does not cater well to novice users due to its reliance on configuration files and command-line options for customization.
  • Dependency on Perl
    The reliance on Perl for extensions might be a drawback for users who are not familiar with the language or prefer not to have additional dependencies.
  • Lack of Integrated Tabs
    Unlike some modern terminal emulators, rxvt-unicode does not have built-in tab support, requiring users to rely on external tools or workarounds.

Analysis of CMDBuild

Overall verdict

  • CMDBuild can be considered a good choice for organizations looking for a customizable and scalable solution to manage their configuration and change management needs. Its open-source nature avoids vendor lock-in, and its adaptability suits various organizational requirements. However, it requires a certain level of technical expertise to implement and maintain, which might be a consideration for some organizations.

Why this product is good

  • CMDBuild is a flexible open-source software designed for the management of enterprise assets and IT services. It offers powerful tools for creating and managing a configuration management database (CMDB), including advanced features like workflows, scheduling, reporting, and integration with other systems. Its flexibility and open-source nature allow organizations to customize it according to their specific needs, supporting a wide range of applications beyond traditional CMDB purposes.

Recommended for

  • Organizations seeking an open-source solution for configuration and asset management.
  • IT departments looking to integrate a flexible CMDB with existing ITIL processes.
  • Businesses requiring a customizable platform for managing complex IT environments.

Analysis of rxvt-unicode

Overall verdict

  • rxvt-unicode is a highly regarded terminal emulator, particularly among Unix-like operating systems users.

Why this product is good

  • Rxvt-unicode is known for its efficiency and low resource consumption compared to other terminal emulators. It supports Unicode, providing robust multilingual text handling, and allows for multiple font support. Its extensibility, through Perl scripts and add-ons, offers flexibility and customization options. Furthermore, its simple, minimalistic design appeals to users who prefer a no-nonsense terminal environment.

Recommended for

    rxvt-unicode is recommended for advanced users, developers, and system administrators who work in Unix-like environments and require a lightweight terminal emulator with Unicode support and extensive customization options. It is particularly suitable for those who value performance and minimal resource usage.

CMDBuild videos

CMDBuild READY2USE Asset Management

More videos:

  • Review - CMDBuild vs CMDBuild REDY2USE - Webinar
  • Review - CMDBuild READY2USE quick overview

rxvt-unicode videos

No rxvt-unicode videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CMDBuild and rxvt-unicode)
SSH
19 19%
81% 81
Server Management
17 17%
83% 83
Tool
22 22%
78% 78
Terminal Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CMDBuild and rxvt-unicode. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare CMDBuild and rxvt-unicode

CMDBuild Reviews

We have no reviews of CMDBuild yet.
Be the first one to post

rxvt-unicode Reviews

The 10 Best Linux Terminal Emulators
The key feature of rxvt-Unicode is that it is rock solid as software. It hardly crashes and is free of glitches. Experienced Linux users also prefer it because the main rxvt-Unicode program runs as a daemon, conserving system resources. Developers might love to try its support of Perl extensions which might increase productivity.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, rxvt-unicode seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CMDBuild mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CMDBuild yet. Tracking of CMDBuild recommendations started around Mar 2021.

rxvt-unicode mentions (3)

  • tabby - a terminal for the modern age
    There are many terminal emulators, for throughput, predictable behavior with modern features, quake style, theming, tabs, and much more. Most of the features you need are supported by urxvt, and if it's not, there's sure to be another non-electron terminal emulator that has exactly what you need. Source: over 3 years ago
  • What terminal emulator do you use?
    Urxvt — Highly extendable (with Perl) unicode enabled rxvt-clone terminal emulator featuring tabbing, url launching, a Quake style drop-down mode and pseudo-transparency http://software.schmorp.de/pkg/rxvt-unicode.html. Source: about 4 years ago
  • Any good truecolor terminals ?
    x11-terms/rxvt-unicode Available versions: (~)9.22-r7t *9999lt {-24-bit-color 256-color blink fading-colors +font-styles gdk-pixbuf iso14755 +mousewheel +perl -sgrmouse startup-notification unicode3 +utmp +wtmp xft} Homepage: http://software.schmorp.de/pkg/rxvt-unicode.html Description: rxvt clone with xft and unicode support. Source: about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CMDBuild and rxvt-unicode, you can also consider the following products

KiTTY - KiTTY is a fork from version 0.70 of PuTTY. It adds extra features to PuTTY.

MobaXterm - Enhanced terminal for Windows with X11 server, tabbed SSH client, network tools and much more

Console - Console is a Windows console window enhancement.

GNOME Terminal - GNOME Terminal is a terminal emulator for GNOME desktop.

Gnome Terminator - Terminator is one of the most useful and dynamic terminal emulators for Unix based operating systems.

PowerShell - Download WMF. Windows Management Framework contains the latest versions of PowerShell, DSC, WMI, and WinRM for older versions of Windows. PowerShell Module Browser. Search for PowerShell modules and cmdlets.