Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Clustrix VS ObjectBox

Compare Clustrix VS ObjectBox and see what are their differences

Clustrix logo Clustrix

Clustrix is the leading scale-out SQL database engineered for the cloud.

ObjectBox logo ObjectBox

ObjectBox empower edge computing with an edge device database and synchronization solution for Mobile & IoT. Store and sync data from edge to cloud.
  • Clustrix Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-17
  • ObjectBox Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-06

ObjectBox is a super fast database and sychronization solution, built uniquely for Mobile and IoT devices. ObjectBox is uniquely designed for small devices, so it is the ideal solution across hardware from Mobile Apps, to IoT Devices and IoT Gateways. It is the first high-performance NoSQL, ACID-compliant on-device edge database. Plus, it's built with developers in mind, with easy to use code that takes minimal time to implement.

ObjectBox supports Java, C/C++, Go, Kotlin, Swift and Python. Running on Android, Mac/iOS, Windows, Linux, Raspbian & more.

Clustrix features and specs

  • Scalability
    Clustrix, which is now integrated into MariaDB as the Xpand storage engine, offers excellent horizontal scalability that allows the database to efficiently handle increased loads by adding more nodes.
  • High Availability
    Provides robust fault tolerance and high availability through automatic node failover and data redundancy, ensuring minimal downtime in case of node failures.
  • Distributed SQL
    Supports distributed SQL operations that deliver high performance for complex queries and large-scale transaction processing, suitable for demanding applications.
  • Seamless Integration
    Integrates seamlessly with MariaDB Enterprise, facilitating easy migration and enhanced features such as security and analytics.

Possible disadvantages of Clustrix

  • Complex Setup
    The initial setup and configuration can be complex, requiring experienced database administrators to properly optimize and manage the database cluster.
  • Cost
    As part of MariaDB Enterprise, the cost may be higher compared to standalone open-source solutions, due to additional features and support.
  • Specific Use Cases
    Designed for specific high-demand use cases, meaning it might not be the best fit for smaller applications or those with simpler database requirements.
  • Learning Curve
    New users may face a steep learning curve to fully utilize the distributed nature and advanced capabilities of Clustrix/Xpand, especially if coming from a traditional SQL background.

ObjectBox features and specs

  • Performance
    ObjectBox is known for its high performance in terms of speed. It provides fast data access and efficient data storage, which can be crucial for mobile applications and IoT devices.
  • Ease of Use
    ObjectBox offers an intuitive API that simplifies database management. Developers can easily implement it without needing extensive database expertise.
  • Object-Oriented Approach
    ObjectBox allows developers to work with database objects directly, eliminating the need for ORMs and reducing boilerplate code.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Supports multiple platforms including Android, iOS, Linux, and others, enabling seamless data management across different operating systems.
  • Automatic Updates
    ObjectBox provides automatic database schema migrations, making it easier to manage changes without manual intervention.
  • Size
    It has a small footprint, which is beneficial for mobile applications where space and resources are constrained.

Possible disadvantages of ObjectBox

  • Limited Complexity Handling
    While great for simpler use cases, ObjectBox may face challenges with complex queries and data structures compared to more traditional SQL-based databases.
  • Community and Support
    Being a relatively newer database solution, it has a smaller community compared to established databases like SQLite, potentially reducing the availability of community-driven support and resources.
  • Feature Set
    It might lack some advanced features found in other databases, such as customized SQL queries, which could be limiting for some applications.
  • Vendor Lock-In
    Using ObjectBox ties you to its ecosystem, which might limit flexibility if you choose to switch databases in the future.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its ease of use, developers unfamiliar with NoSQL or object database paradigms might encounter a learning curve.

Clustrix videos

Clustrix Employee Reviews - Q3 2018

More videos:

  • Review - Clustrix - Scaleout SQL Database Engineered for the Cloud
  • Review - Photobox CTO, Graham Hobson, describes the benefits of Clustrix

ObjectBox videos

Getting Started with Objectbox for Android / Java

More videos:

  • Review - ObjectBox - Startup of Startupnight 2018

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Clustrix and ObjectBox)
Databases
34 34%
66% 66
NoSQL Databases
36 36%
64% 64
Development
46 46%
54% 54
Relational Databases
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Clustrix and ObjectBox. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, ObjectBox seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Clustrix mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Clustrix yet. Tracking of Clustrix recommendations started around Mar 2021.

ObjectBox mentions (7)

  • Publishing to F-Droid
    When I first attempted to publish to F-Droid, I experienced several pipeline issues. After reading through the pipeline logs in GitLab, I realized that my application's database (ObjectBox) was not entirely FOSS compliant and was causing build failures. The following day was spent migrating my app to Room. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Looking for android java developer mentor
    I would focus on Kotlin instead of Java, there's really no point in sticking to Java at this point. And when it comes to databases, some local ones that are pretty easy to get into are Realm and ObjectBox, SQLite can definitely be a bit overwhelming at the beginning. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Want to build a simple database app....Where do I start
    Just to add to this, there's also Realm and ObjectBox as alternatives. Source: over 2 years ago
  • EdgeDB 2.0
    Adding ObjectBox [0] to the list. [0] https://objectbox.io/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
  • Embedded databases - What is an embedded database? and how to choose one
    While - strictly speaking - "database" refers to a systematic collection of data, "Database Management System'', or DBMS, refers to the piece of software that provides an efficient and versatile method of working with data(eg: ObjectBox). However, often the term "database" is also used loosely to refer to a DBMS, and you will find most DBMS only use the term database in their name and communication. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Clustrix and ObjectBox, you can also consider the following products

Realm.io - Realm is a mobile platform and a replacement for SQLite & Core Data. Build offline-first, reactive mobile experiences using simple data sync.

Microsoft SQL Server Compact - Bring Microsoft SQL Server 2017 to the platform of your choice. Use SQL Server 2017 on Windows, Linux, and Docker containers.

CompactView - Viewer for Microsoft® SQL Server® CE database files (sdf)

UnQLite - UnQLite is a in-process software library which implements a self-contained, serverless...

NuoDB - A scale-out SQL database for global operations

VoltDB - In-memory relational DBMS capable of supporting millions of database operations per second