Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CloudMQTT VS Apache ActiveMQ

Compare CloudMQTT VS Apache ActiveMQ and see what are their differences

CloudMQTT logo CloudMQTT

CloudMQTT implements MQ Telemetry Transport protocol for carrying out messaging using a publish/subscribe message queueing model.

Apache ActiveMQ logo Apache ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is an open source messaging and integration patterns server.
  • CloudMQTT Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-09-25
  • Apache ActiveMQ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-01

CloudMQTT features and specs

  • Scalability
    CloudMQTT allows you to scale your connections and usage based on your needs, providing flexibility for growing applications.
  • Managed Infrastructure
    The service provides a fully managed MQTT broker infrastructure, saving time and resources on setup and maintenance.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    CloudMQTT supports multiple platforms and devices, making integration with a variety of applications and services easier.
  • Security
    Offers features like SSL/TLS encryption and authentication mechanisms to ensure secure data transmission and prevent unauthorized access.
  • User Friendly
    The platform offers an easy-to-use interface with comprehensive documentation, making it accessible even for beginners.

Possible disadvantages of CloudMQTT

  • Cost
    While there are different pricing tiers, the cost can increase significantly with higher usage and the need for advanced features.
  • Vendor Lock-in
    Relying on a specific service provider can lead to vendor lock-in, making it challenging to switch providers without significant effort and restructuring.
  • Limited Offline Access
    As a cloud-based service, it requires an internet connection, which may not be ideal for applications needing offline capabilities.
  • Customizability
    There might be limitations on customization compared to running a self-hosted MQTT broker, which offers more control over configurations.
  • Dependency on Internet
    The need for constant internet connectivity could be a drawback for applications in environments with unstable or limited internet access.

Apache ActiveMQ features and specs

  • Open Source
    ActiveMQ is open-source under the Apache License, making it free to use and modify. This can lead to cost savings compared to commercial solutions.
  • Wide Protocol Support
    ActiveMQ supports multiple messaging protocols, including AMQP, MQTT, OpenWire, Stomp, and others, allowing for flexible integration with various systems and applications.
  • Java Integration
    Written in Java, ActiveMQ integrates well with JVM-based applications and other Apache projects like Camel and Karaf, making it a good fit for Java-centric environments.
  • High Availability
    Features like broker clustering, network of brokers, and failover support provide robust high availability options, ensuring message delivery even in case of failures.
  • Performance and Scalability
    ActiveMQ can handle a large number of messages and users by scaling horizontally, making it suitable for both small and enterprise-level applications.
  • Admin Console
    ActiveMQ provides a web-based admin console for easy management and monitoring of the message broker, simplifying administrative tasks.

Possible disadvantages of Apache ActiveMQ

  • Complex Configuration
    The initial setup and configuration can be complex, especially for newcomers. It often requires a steep learning curve to understand all the available options and optimizations.
  • Resource Intensive
    ActiveMQ can be resource-intensive, particularly in high-throughput scenarios, which may necessitate more robust hardware for optimal performance.
  • Latency
    In certain configurations, ActiveMQ may exhibit higher latency compared to other brokers, which might not make it suitable for use cases requiring real-time guarantees.
  • Java Dependency
    As a Java-based solution, ActiveMQ requires the JVM, which can be a downside for organizations that have standardized on other technology stacks.
  • Community Support
    While there is a community around ActiveMQ, it may not be as large or as active as those for other, similar open-source projects. This can lead to slower responses to issues and fewer community-based resources.
  • Documentation
    Though comprehensive, the documentation can sometimes be difficult to navigate, making it challenging for users to find specific information quickly.

Analysis of Apache ActiveMQ

Overall verdict

  • Apache ActiveMQ is generally considered a good choice for message brokering due to its comprehensive feature set, stability, and scalability. It is especially beneficial in environments where integration between different systems and technologies is necessary, thanks to its support of numerous messaging protocols.

Why this product is good

  • Apache ActiveMQ is a popular open-source message broker that is known for its flexibility and reliability. It supports multiple messaging protocols and offers features such as high availability, load balancing, and a robust set of messaging patterns. It is a mature project with a large user base and a supportive community. Its ability to integrate with various platforms and languages, along with its rich feature set, makes it a suitable choice for many applications requiring reliable message queuing.

Recommended for

    Apache ActiveMQ is recommended for enterprises looking for a reliable and scalable message broker, developers needing rich messaging functionality, and organizations that require robust support for various messaging protocols, including JMS, AMQP, STOMP, and MQTT. It is particularly well-suited for applications that need to distribute messages between different applications, languages, and platforms.

CloudMQTT videos

Triggering Sonoff S20 via Amazon Echo and IFTTT/Lambda/CloudMQTT

More videos:

  • Demo - Home Automation Demo: ESP8266 MicroPython, CloudMQTT and IOT MQTT Dashboard android app

Apache ActiveMQ videos

No Apache ActiveMQ videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CloudMQTT and Apache ActiveMQ)
Data Integration
23 23%
77% 77
Web Service Automation
18 18%
82% 82
Stream Processing
12 12%
88% 88
IoT
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using CloudMQTT and Apache ActiveMQ. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare CloudMQTT and Apache ActiveMQ

CloudMQTT Reviews

We have no reviews of CloudMQTT yet.
Be the first one to post

Apache ActiveMQ Reviews

6 Best Kafka Alternatives: 2022’s Must-know List
ActiveMQ is a flexible, open-source, multi-protocol messaging broker that supports many protocols. This makes it easy for developers to use a variety of languages and platforms. The AMQP protocol facilitates integration with many applications based on different platforms. However, ActiveMQ’s high-end data accessibility capabilities are complemented by its load balancing,...
Source: hevodata.com
Top 15 Alternatives to RabbitMQ In 2021
It is a managed information broker for Apache ActiveMQ which has simple installation and it runs message broker in cloud. It doesn’t need any special look after regular management and maintenance of the message system. It is utilized to send bulk message services.
Source: gokicker.com
Top 15 Kafka Alternatives Popular In 2021
Apache ActiveMQ is a popular, open-source, flexible multi-protocol messaging broker. Since it has great support for industry-based protocols, developers get access to languages and platforms. It helps in connecting clients written in languages like Python, C, C++, JavaScript, etc. With the help of the AMQP protocol, integration with many applications with different platforms...

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache ActiveMQ should be more popular than CloudMQTT. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CloudMQTT mentions (2)

  • A beginner's end-to-end project: Raspberry Pi sensor data to dashboard -- I need some general advice getting started
    If it's IoT data, I would first send it to a Cloud MQTT Broker (cloudmqtt.com or hivemq.com). These brokers handle the spotty unstable connectivity between themselves and MQTT/IoT devices or clients. Other systems will not handle this instability in connectivity very well. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Connecting to Mqtt broker over GSM or cellular network
    I am trying to make a vehicle tracker, So I am using GPS and Gsm module. I am willing to transfer latlong over cellular network through MQTT to Cloudmqtt.com or any similar. Have anyone done similar project ?, Please help. I tried searching on google.. But all I get is for ESP or NodeMCU. Source: almost 4 years ago

Apache ActiveMQ mentions (7)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CloudMQTT and Apache ActiveMQ, you can also consider the following products

HiveMQ - HiveMQ is the MQTT based messaging platform for fast, efficient and reliable data movement to and from connected IoT devices and enterprise systems

RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.

IBM MQ - IBM MQ is messaging middleware that simplifies and accelerates the integration of diverse applications and data across multiple platforms.

EMQX - EMQX is an open source MQTT 5.0 broker for mission-critical IoT scenarios, massively scalable and highly available clustering, running anywhere from edge to cloud.

Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.

Amazon SQS - Amazon Simple Queue Service is a fully managed message queuing service.