Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Cloudback.it VS CodeFactor.io

Compare Cloudback.it VS CodeFactor.io and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Cloudback.it logo Cloudback.it

Cloudback secures your GitHub repositories with recurrent data backup. With Cloudback you can use your favorite cloud storage provider or a built-in one.

CodeFactor.io logo CodeFactor.io

Automated Code Review for GitHub & BitBucket
  • Cloudback.it
    Image date //
    2024-03-04

Features

We offer the most comprehensive backup on the market. Cloudback lets you store all the information you need to restore the entire repository in the event of a disaster. Back up the GitHub repository code, issues, labels, comments, milestones, etc.

Flexible schedule

You can set up a flexible schedule for each repository. Cloudback then automatically backs up the repositories according to the schedule. You can also manually trigger a backup at any time.

Customer-managed storage providers

  • Microsoft Azure Blob Storage
  • Microsoft OneDrive
  • Amazon S3
  • Google Cloud Storage
  • Alibaba Cloud Object Storage
  • OpenStack Swift

Cloudback-managed storages

  • US, EU, UK, Sidney, Singapore

Data deduplication

Reduce storage costs while using your own storage. Learn more

And more

Learn more about Cloudback features in our documentation

  • CodeFactor.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-19

Cloudback.it

$ Details
freemium $10.0 / Monthly (per repository monthly)
Platforms
GitHub AWS Azure Google Cloud Alibaba Cloud OpenStack Swift Wasabi GitLab
Release Date
2020 October

Cloudback.it features and specs

  • Automated backups
    Scheduled GitHub repository backups
  • Configurable schedule
    Various backup schedules supported
  • Cloud storage providers
    Azure, AWS S3, AWS Glacier, Google Cloud, Alibaba Cloud, built-in Cloudback storage
  • Easy to use
    On click setup
  • Microsoft Azure Blob Container support
    Use your own Microsoft Azure Blob Container to save backups
  • Amazon S3 Bucket support
    Use your own Amazon S3 Bucket to save backups
  • Amazon S3 Glacier support
    Use your own Amazon S3 Glacier to save backups
  • Google Cloud Storage Bucket support
    Use your own Google Cloud Storage Bucket to save backups
  • Alibaba Cloud Object Storage Service support
    Use your own Alibaba Cloud Object Storage Service to save backups
  • Metadata backups
    The backups include the repository metadata such as issues, labels, milestones, and comments
  • Download backup
    Download entire backup: repository and metadata
  • Restore backups
    Easy to restore the backup as a new GitHub repository

CodeFactor.io features and specs

  • Real-time Code Review
    CodeFactor.io provides immediate feedback on code changes by performing real-time code reviews, which helps catch issues early in the development process.
  • Integration with Popular Platforms
    The platform offers seamless integration with popular version control systems like GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, allowing easy adoption into existing workflows.
  • Detailed Reports
    Generates detailed reports with clear metrics and actionable insights on code quality, helping teams understand and improve their codebase.
  • Automated Code Review
    Automates the code review process, saving developers time and ensuring consistency in code quality assessments.
  • Support for Multiple Languages
    Supports a wide range of programming languages, making it versatile for teams working with diverse technology stacks.

Possible disadvantages of CodeFactor.io

  • Limited Free Plan
    The free plan has limitations in terms of features and the number of private repositories it can support, which may not be sufficient for larger teams or projects.
  • False Positives/Negatives
    Like many automated code review tools, CodeFactor.io can sometimes generate false positives or negatives, which might require manual inspection.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users have reported performance issues, such as slow analysis times, especially with very large codebases.
  • Learning Curve
    Although the interface is user-friendly, there can be a learning curve associated with interpreting some of the more detailed metrics and reports.
  • Customization Limitations
    The level of customization in the analysis rules and settings can be limited compared to some other code quality tools, potentially restricting its adaptability to specific team needs.

Cloudback.it videos

No Cloudback.it videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

CodeFactor.io videos

Getting started with CodeFactor.io

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Cloudback.it and CodeFactor.io)
GitHub
100 100%
0% 0
Code Coverage
0 0%
100% 100
Backup And Disaster Recovery
Code Quality
0 0%
100% 100

Questions and Answers

As answered by people managing Cloudback.it and CodeFactor.io.

What makes your product unique?

Cloudback.it's answer

Simplicity and user-friendliness, from the UX to the backup archive.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Cloudback.it's answer

1) Pricing policy - per repository, not per seats. 2) User-friendly backup archives. End user can take an archive and restore even manually. 3) Easy to use, the simplified UI and UX, without heavy enterprise-focused routines (but still all features are in place).

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Cloudback.it's answer

It is Azure-hosted .NET core application, built with security in mind.

User comments

Share your experience with using Cloudback.it and CodeFactor.io. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Cloudback.it seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Cloudback.it mentions (1)

  • I have fucked up please please helpp
    If you were using GitHub Desktop, then the file should be in the recycle bin. See this SO answer for more details. You can also try using git restore command. Finally, you can use backup tools like Cloudback to protect your repositories in the future. This will not help you to restore the local changes from your computer, but still can be useful in case of any wrong changes done to your repository. Source: about 2 years ago

CodeFactor.io mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CodeFactor.io yet. Tracking of CodeFactor.io recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Cloudback.it and CodeFactor.io, you can also consider the following products

GitProtect.io - Fully manageable, most professional GitHub and Bitbucket backup

Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.

Recuva - Accidentally deleted an important file? Lost files after a computer crash?

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

BackHub - Backup and archive your GitHub repositories with BackHub. Find us on the GitHub Marketplace.

CodeClimate - Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.