Closure Compiler
JavaScript Obfuscator
Terser
UglifyJS
DomainLockJS
SonarQube
Checkmarx
Coverity Scan
BrowserStack
LambdaTest
Sauce Labs
Selenium
browserling
CrossBrowserTesting
Ghost Inspector
Testsigma
BrowserStack is a leading software testing platform powering over two million tests every day across 15 global data centers. With BrowserStack, developers can comprehensively test their websites and mobile applications across 2,000+ real mobile devices and browsers in a single cloud platform—and at scale. BrowserStack helps Tesco, Shell, NVIDIA, Discovery, Wells Fargo, and over 50,000 customers deliver quality software at speed.
Closure Compiler BrowserStackClosure Compiler might be a bit more popular than BrowserStack. We know about 10 links to it since March 2021 and only 8 links to BrowserStack. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I’m not exactly sure what you are trying to do but JavaScript Source Maps basically do this same thing with browsers and they use https://developers.google.com/closure/compiler/. Source: over 2 years ago
I'm using the Google Closure Compiler. I believe it has similar capabilities. Source: over 2 years ago
In a real world scenario you'd probably run the resulting JS through Closure Compiler. It would be nice to see how that affects both code size and performance. Source: over 2 years ago
Kind of funny that Google actually does have a product called the "Google Closure compiler". It creates different kinds of compilations though. https://developers.google.com/closure/compiler. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Partially, depending on what's used it also optimizes the javascript code. See Google's closure compiler for more info. Source: about 3 years ago
This is pretty cool - the Jira/Linear integration could save a ton of manual work. How do you handle test data setup and teardown? That's usually where these workflows get messy. For alternatives in this space, there's qawolf (https://qawolf.com) for similar automated testing workflows, or I'm actually building bug0 (https://bug0.com) which also does AI-powered test automation, still in beta. For the more... - Source: Hacker News / 26 days ago
Platforms like Browserstack or SauceLabs offer virtual instances of real devices and browsers for manual and end-to-end testing. Caveat: subscriptions cost money and are on a per-seat basis. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
If you go to browserstack.com (a website to test other websites) you can probably to the chatgpt url and sign up there. Source: over 2 years ago
For testing on Mac or iOS, use browserstack.com, you'll spend considerably less using that than you would buying the actual hardware. Source: over 2 years ago
I've seen subscription services such as browserstack.com and lambdatest.com but I believe they cost to get the full range of mac browsers and devices. Source: over 2 years ago
JavaScript Obfuscator - JavaScript Obfuscator is a free online tool that obfuscates your source code, preventing it from being stolen and used without permission.
LambdaTest - Perform Web Testing on 2000+ Browsers & OS
Terser - JavaScript parser, mangler, optimizer and beautifier toolkit for ES6+
Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.
UglifyJS - JavaScript minifier, beautifier, mangler and parser toolkit.
Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.
