Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Closure Compiler VS BrowserStack

Compare Closure Compiler VS BrowserStack and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Closure Compiler logo Closure Compiler

The Closure Compiler is a tool for making JavaScript download and run faster.

BrowserStack logo BrowserStack

BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.
  • Closure Compiler Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-23
  • BrowserStack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2025-05-06

BrowserStack is a leading software testing platform powering over two million tests every day across 15 global data centers. With BrowserStack, developers can comprehensively test their websites and mobile applications across 2,000+ real mobile devices and browsers in a single cloud platform—and at scale. BrowserStack helps Tesco, Shell, NVIDIA, Discovery, Wells Fargo, and over 50,000 customers deliver quality software at speed.

Closure Compiler

Pricing URL
-
$ Details
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

BrowserStack

$ Details
freemium $29.0 / Monthly (Starts at single user plans and billed annually)
Platforms
Mac OSX Android Windows Browser Web iOS Google Chrome Firefox Safari REST API Internet Explorer
Release Date
2012 September
Startup details
Country
Ireland
State
Dublin
City
Dublin
Founder(s)
Nakul Aggarwal
Employees
500 - 999

Closure Compiler features and specs

  • Advanced Optimizations
    Closure Compiler can perform aggressive optimization techniques that result in highly efficient and smaller JavaScript code. This improves load times and performance for web applications.
  • Code Minification
    The compiler reduces the size of JavaScript files by removing unnecessary whitespace, comments, and shortening variable names, which helps in reducing bandwidth usage and enhancing page load speed.
  • Dead Code Elimination
    Closure Compiler can analyze JavaScript code to eliminate dead code, which is code that is never executed or used, resulting in a cleaner and more efficient codebase.
  • Code Warnings and Checks
    It provides developers with advanced code warnings and type checking to identify potential errors, helping improve code quality and reduce bugs.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    Closure Compiler can help ensure that JavaScript code behaves consistently across different browsers by transforming it into a format that's compatible with a wider range of environments.

Possible disadvantages of Closure Compiler

  • Complex Setup
    Getting started with Closure Compiler can be complex, especially for developers who are not familiar with its configuration and setup requirements.
  • Learning Curve
    There is a learning curve associated with understanding how to use the tool effectively, particularly when using advanced optimization features.
  • Debugging Challenges
    Minified and optimized code can be difficult to debug because variable names and function names are often changed to something less human-readable.
  • Integration Limitations
    Integrating Closure Compiler into existing build systems or workflows might require additional effort and adjustments, particularly if those systems are not designed to accommodate complex build tools.
  • Dependency Management
    Closure Compiler requires careful management of JavaScript dependencies, which can be cumbersome in large projects or projects lacking modular architecture.

BrowserStack features and specs

  • Cloud-based
  • Browser Extensions
  • SaaS

Analysis of BrowserStack

Overall verdict

  • Overall, BrowserStack is considered a highly effective and reliable tool in the web development and testing community. Its extensive features, real-device testing capabilities, and seamless integration make it a good choice for those needing comprehensive cross-browser testing solutions.

Why this product is good

  • BrowserStack is a robust and widely used web testing platform that provides developers with the ability to test their websites and applications across a vast array of browsers and devices. It offers real device cloud testing, ensuring that users can assess how their applications perform on actual devices rather than simulations. This makes it an invaluable tool for identifying and resolving cross-browser compatibility issues. Additionally, it integrates with popular CI/CD tools, enhancing the workflow efficiency for development teams.

Recommended for

  • Web developers
  • QA engineers
  • Agile development teams
  • Companies needing cross-browser testing across multiple devices
  • Teams looking for CI/CD integration in their testing process

Closure Compiler videos

Kevin Macdonald - How Closure Compiler can help protect your IP

More videos:

  • Review - Ильяс Кабиров — Google Closure Compiler — принцип работы и использование в современном фронтенде

BrowserStack videos

BrowserStack Overview

More videos:

  • Tutorial - SpeedLab by BrowserStack
  • Review - SharePoint Team Finds BrowserStack Invaluable

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Closure Compiler and BrowserStack)
Web Application Bundler
100 100%
0% 0
Website Testing
0 0%
100% 100
Tool
100 100%
0% 0
Browser Testing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Closure Compiler and BrowserStack. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Closure Compiler and BrowserStack

Closure Compiler Reviews

We have no reviews of Closure Compiler yet.
Be the first one to post

BrowserStack Reviews

Top Selenium Alternatives
BrowserStack is another leading cloud-based testing platform that offers access to a vast array of browsers and real mobile devices. It's designed to simplify the testing process by allowing tests to run in parallel across different environments, significantly reducing the time needed for comprehensive testing. BrowserStack features include live, interactive testing,...
Source: bugbug.io
Why choose HeadSpin over BrowserStack?
Companies like HeadSpin and BrowserStack play a significant role in fulfilling the demand for testing on real devices and cross-browser devices. Their ability to test on real devices online and monitor digital experiences adds to the value proposition of organizations implementing testing solutions. However, every company has different requirements and here are a few reasons...
Source: www.headspin.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Closure Compiler might be a bit more popular than BrowserStack. We know about 10 links to it since March 2021 and only 8 links to BrowserStack. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Closure Compiler mentions (10)

View more

BrowserStack mentions (8)

  • Show HN: Quell – AI QA Agent Working Across Linear, Vercel, Jira, Netlify, Figma
    This is pretty cool - the Jira/Linear integration could save a ton of manual work. How do you handle test data setup and teardown? That's usually where these workflows get messy. For alternatives in this space, there's qawolf (https://qawolf.com) for similar automated testing workflows, or I'm actually building bug0 (https://bug0.com) which also does AI-powered test automation, still in beta. For the more... - Source: Hacker News / 17 days ago
  • 🛑 Stop resizing your browser: improve testing for responsiveness
    Platforms like Browserstack or SauceLabs offer virtual instances of real devices and browsers for manual and end-to-end testing. Caveat: subscriptions cost money and are on a per-seat basis. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Unsupported country
    If you go to browserstack.com (a website to test other websites) you can probably to the chatgpt url and sign up there. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Windows vs Mac?
    For testing on Mac or iOS, use browserstack.com, you'll spend considerably less using that than you would buying the actual hardware. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Free methods for testing websites/apps across devices?
    I've seen subscription services such as browserstack.com and lambdatest.com but I believe they cost to get the full range of mac browsers and devices. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Closure Compiler and BrowserStack, you can also consider the following products

JavaScript Obfuscator - JavaScript Obfuscator is a free online tool that obfuscates your source code, preventing it from being stolen and used without permission.

LambdaTest - Perform Web Testing on 2000+ Browsers & OS

Terser - JavaScript parser, mangler, optimizer and beautifier toolkit for ES6+

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

UglifyJS - JavaScript minifier, beautifier, mangler and parser toolkit.

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.