Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

ClangFormat VS JavaScript Obfuscator

Compare ClangFormat VS JavaScript Obfuscator and see what are their differences

ClangFormat logo ClangFormat

A tool to format C/C++/Java/JavaScript/Objective-C/Protobuf code.

JavaScript Obfuscator logo JavaScript Obfuscator

JavaScript Obfuscator is a free online tool that obfuscates your source code, preventing it from being stolen and used without permission.
  • ClangFormat Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-08
  • JavaScript Obfuscator Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-23

ClangFormat features and specs

  • Consistency
    ClangFormat enforces a consistent coding style across a codebase, reducing the cognitive load on developers by allowing them to focus on code functionality instead of style.
  • Automation
    It automates the code formatting process, saving time for developers by eliminating the need for manual adjustments and code styling.
  • Integration
    ClangFormat can be easily integrated into different editors and IDEs, making it accessible to developers through their preferred tools.
  • Configurability
    It offers a high level of configurability, allowing teams to tailor the formatting style to meet their specific needs and preferences.
  • Supports Multiple Languages
    ClangFormat supports formatting for various languages like C, C++, JavaScript, Java, Objective-C, and more, making it versatile for multi-language projects.

Possible disadvantages of ClangFormat

  • Learning Curve
    New users may experience a learning curve understanding and configuring ClangFormat's style options, especially for complex formatting rules.
  • Overlapping Configurations
    Conflicts can arise in team settings if multiple style configurations or overrides are used without coordination.
  • Opinionated Defaults
    Some developers may find the defaults too opinionated or not in line with their preferred coding style, requiring additional setup and configuration.
  • Complexity in Large Projects
    In large projects, using ClangFormat might lead to extensive changes in code formatting, which can clutter version control history or make diffs harder to understand.
  • Dependency on External Tools
    Teams become reliant on an external tool for maintaining code style, introducing an additional layer of dependency into their development workflow.

JavaScript Obfuscator features and specs

  • Increased Code Security
    JavaScript obfuscation makes the code difficult to understand, providing an additional layer of security against code theft and unauthorized use.
  • Protection from Reverse Engineering
    By transforming the code into an unreadable format, obfuscation helps shield your code logic from competitors seeking to replicate your functionality.
  • Deterrence against Hackers
    Obfuscated code acts as a deterrent to hackers by making it time-consuming and resource-intensive to attempt to decipher the software’s mechanics.
  • Preservation of Functionality
    Despite altering the code appearance, obfuscation ensures that the original behavior and functionality of the JavaScript code remain unchanged.
  • Customization Options
    The obfuscator provides multiple options and settings for customizing the level and style of obfuscation, allowing you to balance between security and performance.

Possible disadvantages of JavaScript Obfuscator

  • Performance Overhead
    Obfuscated code can be less performant since the transformations applied can increase the size and decrease the readability of the code, impacting loading times.
  • Debugging Challenges
    Diagnosing and fixing issues in obfuscated code can be challenging due to the lack of meaningful variable names and structural clarity.
  • Not Foolproof
    While obfuscation increases the difficulty of reverse engineering, it is not an impenetrable solution, and determined attackers can still potentially decode the logic.
  • Potential Compatibility Issues
    Obfuscation might introduce compatibility problems with certain environments or tools, particularly if aggressive transformations are applied.
  • Increased Build Complexity
    Integrating obfuscation into the development and deployment pipeline adds complexity, requiring additional steps and potential modifications to the build process.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to ClangFormat and JavaScript Obfuscator)
Web Application Bundler
22 22%
78% 78
File Management
100 100%
0% 0
Tool
27 27%
73% 73
Monitoring Tools
15 15%
85% 85

User comments

Share your experience with using ClangFormat and JavaScript Obfuscator. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, JavaScript Obfuscator seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 29 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

ClangFormat mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of ClangFormat yet. Tracking of ClangFormat recommendations started around Mar 2021.

JavaScript Obfuscator mentions (29)

  • Here's how to brew obfuscation in JavaScript without burning the lab: AST, Babel, plugins.
    Now let's take the above code and modify it with a popular obfuscator for JS - obfuscator.io. As a result, we will get a code like this:. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • How to Encrypt JavaScript Code for Web Security
    You can use tools like JavaScript Obfuscator or UglifyJS to obfuscate your code. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • What to do when someone clones your site?
    I know it's frowned upon here, but there are commercial and open source[1] javascript obfuscators with domain locking functionalities. If your site is already a SPA, they can make it very painful to just lift it (not impossible, obviously, because everything is reverse-engineerable, but the point is to discourage the majority of thiefs). You can be creative: for example, if whoever cloned your site is located in... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Need ideas with modding TCOAAL
    I don't need/use IDA, Nemlei just used https://obfuscator.io/, which just obfuscates the crap out of the code using various known methods (which I won't go into detail, it's public knowledge) and an un-obfuscation was cooked up by others. The one fucked-up thing the website does is randomizing function names, it just changes every variable/function name. We can't "un-obfuscate" those, so it's up to our brains to... Source: over 1 year ago
  • How do human read code like this
    It's to purposefully makes your code harder to read so it prevents people from stealing your work. Here's a tool that does it: https://obfuscator.io/. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ClangFormat and JavaScript Obfuscator, you can also consider the following products

Uncrustify - Banish crusty code with the Uncrustify C/C++/C#/Obj-C/D/Java/Pawn/VALA source code beautifier.

Terser - JavaScript parser, mangler, optimizer and beautifier toolkit for ES6+

UglifyJS - JavaScript minifier, beautifier, mangler and parser toolkit.

Code Beautifier - Code Beautifier CSS Formatter and Optimiser - Online CSS parser and Optimiser

Closure Compiler - The Closure Compiler is a tool for making JavaScript download and run faster.

Artistic Style - astyle, code formatting