Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

clang VS Lightspark

Compare clang VS Lightspark and see what are their differences

clang logo clang

C, C++, Objective C and Objective C++ front-end for the LLVM compiler.

Lightspark logo Lightspark

The Lightspark project
  • clang Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-08-01
  • Lightspark Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-02

clang videos

Use Clang on Windows, Linux, and macOS

More videos:

  • Review - The Clang Swordsman
  • Review - CLANG AND BANG: BI'S AND TRI'S FOR DAYS!

Lightspark videos

No Lightspark videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to clang and Lightspark)
Email Marketing
100 100%
0% 0
Online Services
0 0%
100% 100
IDE
64 64%
36% 36
Product Presentation
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using clang and Lightspark. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

clang might be a bit more popular than Lightspark. We know about 11 links to it since March 2021 and only 9 links to Lightspark. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

clang mentions (11)

  • Ready to miss a semi colon and spend the next hour stressing over what went wrong?
    Clang is an LLVM based C compiler that "allows better diagnostics, better integration with IDEs, a license that is compatible with commercial products, and a nimble compiler that is easy to develop and maintain," compared to other options. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Alternatives of MinGW for MacOS
    VS Code is not an IDE. It's simply an editor without any built-in compiler tools. So you MUST use "other compiler" (and bintools) anyway. As I said, Apple's official C/C++ compiler is LLVM-Clang, which offers even better optimization in some tasks. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • What is the point of free and open source software?
    One illustration of this came in 2015 when Stallman decided he Would rather prevent the Gnu Compiler Collection from supporting modern IDE features like symbol completion, than allow GCC front ends to be paired with free-but-not-copyleft backends like LLVM and Clang: "Since LLVM and Clang are not copylefted, they invite nonfree extensions. They are a gaping hole in the defensive wall around our city." Allowing... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • node-sass: Build fails on OpenBSD - How to fix
    It is because clang++ is required but instead what is actually used is g++. Therefore, the successful way is:. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Planning an online C compiler for IPC144
    Thus, I have other smaller objectives to look for. The first thing I am looking for is to make the simplest code example, a "Hello World" program to be compilable and runnable in the browser. This will require a lot of configuration, since emscripten, a C-to-WebAssembly compiler, actually has some dependencies like LLVM and clang, which took me over 6 hours to compile a single time so I could set the environment... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
View more

Lightspark mentions (9)

  • When SVG almost got network support for raw sockets
    Not the first attempted Flash reimplementation[1,2,3]. The GNU one didn’t work all that well back in the day as far as I remember, but then Flash was a moving target at the time. [1]: https://www.gnu.org/software/gnash/ [2]: http://lightspark.github.io/ [3]: https://github.com/mozilla/shumway. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Good flash emulator for walfas?
    A true emulator would be something like Ruffle or Lightspark. Ruffle I know doesn't work well with Walfas last time I checked. I don't know about Lightspark. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Flash game to Html5 converter
    Lightspark, a browser plugin written in C++. It's a work in progress, not every flash content will work. Modern mainstream browsers don't support running it within a page, so flash content needs to be run in a standalone lightspark app, or in some lesser known browsers. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • How and where do I tell CMake where my C/CXX compiler is?
    I'm trying to install lightspark on my computer, and it hinges on launching a shell script that mainly executes a CMake command. When I try ./build.sh (the name of the shell script), I get a bunch of lines of errors. The first one I think is major is CMake Error at /usr/share/cmake-3.23/Modules/CMakeTestCCompiler.cmake:69 (message): The C compiler "/usr/bin/cc" is not able to compile a simple test... Source: almost 2 years ago
  • What "legacy" software are you still forced to use in 2022 that you wish would die?
    I'm having alot of fun with this post actually. I wouldn't be surprised if there was some alternative or workaround for whatever you guys need to run. For example, instead of the clunky Java, we have this. Instead of Flash, try this. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing clang and Lightspark, you can also consider the following products

GNU Compiler Collection - The GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) is a compiler system produced by the GNU Project supporting...

Ruffle - An open source Flash player

LLVM - LLVM is a compiler infrastructure designed for compile-time, link-time, run-time, and...

BlueMaxima's Flashpoint - the webgame preservation project.

PyCharm - Python & Django IDE with intelligent code completion, on-the-fly error checking, quick-fixes, and much more...

Flash Player 2021 - Want to fix "This plugin is not supported" and "Adobe Flash Player is blocked" error messages? This extension will remove those messages and allow you to play Flash in any website with a single click.