Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

clang VS Crow framework

Compare clang VS Crow framework and see what are their differences

clang logo clang

C, C++, Objective C and Objective C++ front-end for the LLVM compiler.

Crow framework logo Crow framework

C++ micro web framework inspired by Python Flask
  • clang Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-08-01
  • Crow framework Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-24

clang features and specs

  • High Performance
    Clang is known for its fast compilation time and efficient use of memory, which makes it ideal for large projects that require frequent builds.
  • Modular Design
    The modular design of Clang allows developers to easily integrate it with other tools and projects. This flexibility is particularly beneficial for custom compilers and IDEs.
  • Expressive Diagnostics
    Clang provides highly detailed and easy-to-understand error and warning messages, which help developers quickly identify and fix coding issues.
  • LLVM Infrastructure
    Being a part of the LLVM project, Clang benefits from a robust and active community. It gets frequent updates and improvements, keeping it at the forefront of compiler technology.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Clang supports multiple platforms, including Windows, macOS, and Linux. This makes it a versatile choice for cross-platform development projects.

Possible disadvantages of clang

  • Limited Legacy Support
    Clang may not support some older or obscure language extensions that other compilers, like GCC, might handle. This can be an issue when working with legacy codebases.
  • Evolving Ecosystem
    As part of a rapidly evolving ecosystem, Clang can introduce breaking changes or deprecations that require developers to frequently update their code.
  • Resource Intensive
    Although Clang is efficient, the compilation of very large codebases might require significant system resources, potentially straining less powerful systems.
  • Less Mature in Certain Areas
    Compared to GCC, Clang can be less mature in handling certain language features or optimizations, especially in newer or less common use cases.

Crow framework features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

clang videos

Use Clang on Windows, Linux, and macOS

More videos:

  • Review - The Clang Swordsman
  • Review - CLANG AND BANG: BI'S AND TRI'S FOR DAYS!

Crow framework videos

No Crow framework videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to clang and Crow framework)
IDE
74 74%
26% 26
Project Management
0 0%
100% 100
Text Editors
100 100%
0% 0
Email Marketing
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using clang and Crow framework. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, clang should be more popular than Crow framework. It has been mentiond 13 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

clang mentions (13)

  • dotnet cross-platform interop with C via Environment.ProcessId system call
    I want to compile C program for various operating systems from one machine, that's why on macOS M1 I use zig drop-in replacement compiler (can be used on Linux, Windows too) for cross-platform compilation. There are also clang, gcc (usually pre-installed on macOS and Linux). For Windows there are Visual Studio installer or mingw (which installs gcc). - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • S2S Compilers: Understanding Switch Case Statements
    If you are turning your source code into languages such as C or C++, it is required to have great understanding and knowledge of C/C++. Since these languages also have compilers be it GNU Compiler Collection or Clang, we have to do a lot of digging and researching around their features and functionalities. There is a lot of benefit in that once the target codebase grows and developers start reusing the target... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Ready to miss a semi colon and spend the next hour stressing over what went wrong?
    Clang is an LLVM based C compiler that "allows better diagnostics, better integration with IDEs, a license that is compatible with commercial products, and a nimble compiler that is easy to develop and maintain," compared to other options. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Alternatives of MinGW for MacOS
    VS Code is not an IDE. It's simply an editor without any built-in compiler tools. So you MUST use "other compiler" (and bintools) anyway. As I said, Apple's official C/C++ compiler is LLVM-Clang, which offers even better optimization in some tasks. Source: over 2 years ago
  • What is the point of free and open source software?
    One illustration of this came in 2015 when Stallman decided he Would rather prevent the Gnu Compiler Collection from supporting modern IDE features like symbol completion, than allow GCC front ends to be paired with free-but-not-copyleft backends like LLVM and Clang: "Since LLVM and Clang are not copylefted, they invite nonfree extensions. They are a gaping hole in the defensive wall around our city." Allowing... - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
View more

Crow framework mentions (6)

  • VueJS goes to microcontroller firmware. This website runs in ESP32 board, with frontend is made with VueJS, TailwindCSS and backend is written in C++.
    I did something similar in the past and used https://github.com/ipkn/crow as web server, in case you want to not implement the web part yourself. Otherwise amazing job! Source: about 2 years ago
  • C++ to Browser JS Framework Recommendations
    Open socket, serve a html page, implement GET/PUT or find framework that do https://github.com/ipkn/crow. Source: over 2 years ago
  • I forked Crow, an abandoned C++ Web Framework. And I'm currently maintaining it.
    Last year I was looking to port a Flask REST API I made to C++ because speed and why not. I went through a few C++ frameworks but eventually chose the abandoned since 2017 Crow. It was by far the easiest to set up and work with (being inspired by Flask in the first place), and it didn't hurt that it supported Websockets. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • C++ vs C# .net 5
    All right Op feel free to check this micro framework out if your company is going to build a rest api in C++ https://github.com/ipkn/crow . Source: almost 4 years ago
  • cpprestsdk in maintenance mode
    I haven't used any of the following libraries/frameworks but maybe some of them will fit for your needs: - Crow micro web framework. Source: almost 4 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing clang and Crow framework, you can also consider the following products

GNU Compiler Collection - The GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) is a compiler system produced by the GNU Project supporting...

Oatpp - Zero-dependency, performance oriented Web Framework for Rapid development in C++

LLVM - LLVM is a compiler infrastructure designed for compile-time, link-time, run-time, and...

Cutelyst - Qt-based web framework using the elegant approach of Catalyst framework

PyCharm - Python & Django IDE with intelligent code completion, on-the-fly error checking, quick-fixes, and much more...

Crow - A Fast and Easy to use microframework for the web.