Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Clang Static Analyzer VS VisualCodeGrepper

Compare Clang Static Analyzer VS VisualCodeGrepper and see what are their differences

Clang Static Analyzer logo Clang Static Analyzer

The Clang Static Analyzer is a source code analysis tool that finds bugs in C, C++, and Objective-C...

VisualCodeGrepper logo VisualCodeGrepper

VCG is an automated code security review tool that handles C/C++, Java, C#, VB and PL/SQL.
  • Clang Static Analyzer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-28
  • VisualCodeGrepper Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-16

Clang Static Analyzer features and specs

  • Integration with Clang
    The Clang Static Analyzer is built as part of the Clang project, ensuring seamless integration with the Clang compiler. This allows for easy adoption in projects that already use Clang for compiling, as there is no need for additional tooling setup.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source tool, Clang Static Analyzer is freely available for anyone to use and modify. This encourages a community-driven approach to improvements and provides the flexibility to tailor the tool to specific needs.
  • Path-sensitive Analysis
    Clang Static Analyzer performs path-sensitive analysis, which means it evaluates different execution paths in the code to detect complex bugs that may only manifest under certain conditions.
  • Deep C/C++ Support
    As part of the LLVM project, Clang Static Analyzer offers robust support for C and C++ languages, leveraging the deep language understanding from the Clang front-end.

Possible disadvantages of Clang Static Analyzer

  • Limited Language Support
    While it is excellent for C and C++, Clang Static Analyzer has limited support for other programming languages, which can be a drawback for projects involving multiple languages.
  • False Positives
    Like many static analysis tools, Clang Static Analyzer can generate false positives, where it reports issues that are not actual bugs. This can require developers to spend additional time reviewing and dismissing spurious warnings.
  • Complex Setup for Non-Clang Projects
    Projects that are not already using Clang might face a more complex setup process to integrate Clang Static Analyzer, as it requires adapting build configurations to use Clang.
  • Performance Overhead
    Running Clang Static Analyzer can introduce significant performance overhead during the analysis phase, which might lead to longer build or integration times, especially for large codebases.

VisualCodeGrepper features and specs

  • Open Source
    VisualCodeGrepper is open source, allowing developers to modify and improve the tool according to their needs and ensuring transparency in its operations.
  • Multi-language Support
    The tool supports multiple programming languages such as C++, C#, Java, JavaScript, and more, making it versatile for developers working in different environments.
  • User-friendly Interface
    It features a simple and intuitive interface that makes it easier for users to navigate and utilize its capabilities effectively without a steep learning curve.
  • Static Code Analysis
    VisualCodeGrepper performs static code analysis helping identify potential security vulnerabilities without needing to execute the code.

Possible disadvantages of VisualCodeGrepper

  • Limited Advanced Features
    Compared to other more comprehensive security analysis tools, VisualCodeGrepper may lack advanced features needed for in-depth analysis.
  • Outdated Information
    As an open-source tool primarily maintained by the community, it might suffer from a lack of regular updates, leading to outdated security vulnerability databases.
  • False Positives
    Users might encounter false positives, where the tool flags non-vulnerable code as a security risk, necessitating manual verification.
  • Limited Scalability
    The tool may not be suitable for analyzing extremely large codebases efficiently, limiting its utility in large-scale projects.

Clang Static Analyzer videos

2019 LLVM Developers’ Meeting: A. Dergachev “Developing the Clang Static Analyzer”

More videos:

  • Review - Clang Static Analyzer - Eduard Bachmakov, Linux Foundation (GSoC)

VisualCodeGrepper videos

No VisualCodeGrepper videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Clang Static Analyzer and VisualCodeGrepper)
Code Analysis
67 67%
33% 33
Code Coverage
76 76%
24% 24
Development
51 51%
49% 49
Code Review
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Clang Static Analyzer and VisualCodeGrepper. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Clang Static Analyzer seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Clang Static Analyzer mentions (7)

  • Improvements to static analysis in GCC 14
    Clang has a similar tool, the Clang Static Analyzer: https://clang-analyzer.llvm.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Memory Safe or Bust?
    Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment [CI/CD] pipelines play a crucial role in enforcing code quality, especially when working with memory-unsafe languages. By integrating automated dynamic analysis tools like Valgrind or AddressSanitizer, static analysis tools like Clang Static Analyzer or cppcheck, and manual code review processes, developers can identify and mitigate many memory-related... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Static Code analysis
    No one static analyzer catches everything. It's best to run multiple. Popular ones are cppcheck, clang-analyzer, GCC static analyzer in GCC 10+, flawfinder, lizard. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Checked C
    With "cross translation units" (CTU) analysis a static analyzer could derive a constraint on `some_function` return value and check this against the array size to detect a possible bug. The Clang static analyzer [1], used through CodeChecker (CC) [2], do support CTU (enabled with `--ctu`). I'm very happy with the result on the code I'm working on. Of course this is not magic, and it's important to understand the... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • What's in your tool belt?
    Cppcheck and Clang Analyzer: statically analyze your code to find bad style and bugs (undefined behavior) respectively. Clang Analyzer can actually be frighteningly clever and has a low false positive rate (unlike most other non-commercial static checkers). Source: almost 3 years ago
View more

VisualCodeGrepper mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of VisualCodeGrepper yet. Tracking of VisualCodeGrepper recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Clang Static Analyzer and VisualCodeGrepper, you can also consider the following products

Cppcheck - Cppcheck is an analysis tool for C/C++ code. It detects the types of bugs that the compilers normally fail to detect. The goal is no false positives. CppCheckDownload cppcheck for free.

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free

lgtm.com - lgtm.com is a platform for code analytics.

Parasoft C/C++test - Ensure compliance with a variety of functional safety, security, and coding standards in embedded C/C++ software.

LDRA Testbed - Liverpool Data Research Associates (LDRA) is a provider of software analysis, test and requirements...