Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Clang Static Analyzer VS Source-Navigator NG

Compare Clang Static Analyzer VS Source-Navigator NG and see what are their differences

Clang Static Analyzer logo Clang Static Analyzer

The Clang Static Analyzer is a source code analysis tool that finds bugs in C, C++, and Objective-C...

Source-Navigator NG logo Source-Navigator NG

Source-Navigator NG is a source code analysis tool.
  • Clang Static Analyzer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-28
  • Source-Navigator NG Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-26

Clang Static Analyzer features and specs

  • Integration with Clang
    The Clang Static Analyzer is built as part of the Clang project, ensuring seamless integration with the Clang compiler. This allows for easy adoption in projects that already use Clang for compiling, as there is no need for additional tooling setup.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source tool, Clang Static Analyzer is freely available for anyone to use and modify. This encourages a community-driven approach to improvements and provides the flexibility to tailor the tool to specific needs.
  • Path-sensitive Analysis
    Clang Static Analyzer performs path-sensitive analysis, which means it evaluates different execution paths in the code to detect complex bugs that may only manifest under certain conditions.
  • Deep C/C++ Support
    As part of the LLVM project, Clang Static Analyzer offers robust support for C and C++ languages, leveraging the deep language understanding from the Clang front-end.

Possible disadvantages of Clang Static Analyzer

  • Limited Language Support
    While it is excellent for C and C++, Clang Static Analyzer has limited support for other programming languages, which can be a drawback for projects involving multiple languages.
  • False Positives
    Like many static analysis tools, Clang Static Analyzer can generate false positives, where it reports issues that are not actual bugs. This can require developers to spend additional time reviewing and dismissing spurious warnings.
  • Complex Setup for Non-Clang Projects
    Projects that are not already using Clang might face a more complex setup process to integrate Clang Static Analyzer, as it requires adapting build configurations to use Clang.
  • Performance Overhead
    Running Clang Static Analyzer can introduce significant performance overhead during the analysis phase, which might lead to longer build or integration times, especially for large codebases.

Source-Navigator NG features and specs

  • Multi-Language Support
    Source-Navigator NG supports a wide range of programming languages including C, C++, Java, and more, making it versatile for different types of development projects.
  • Cross-Platform
    It operates on multiple platforms, including Windows, Linux, and macOS, allowing developers to use the tool irrespective of their operating system.
  • Code Navigation
    The tool offers advanced code navigation features, such as call trees, symbol browsing, and source code tagging, which can significantly enhance productivity.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source software, it is free to use and allows for community-driven improvements and customizations.
  • Integration
    Source-Navigator NG can be integrated with various build systems and version control systems, facilitating seamless development workflows.

Possible disadvantages of Source-Navigator NG

  • Outdated Interface
    The user interface is considered outdated by modern standards, which might affect the user experience negatively.
  • Limited Documentation
    The available documentation is limited and can be challenging for new users to get started with the tool.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users have reported performance issues when handling very large codebases, potentially slowing down development.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Due to its comprehensive set of features, it has a steep learning curve, which might deter less experienced developers.
  • Community Support
    Although it is open-source, the community support is not as extensive as that of other more popular development tools.

Clang Static Analyzer videos

2019 LLVM Developers’ Meeting: A. Dergachev “Developing the Clang Static Analyzer”

More videos:

  • Review - Clang Static Analyzer - Eduard Bachmakov, Linux Foundation (GSoC)

Source-Navigator NG videos

No Source-Navigator NG videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Clang Static Analyzer and Source-Navigator NG)
Code Analysis
58 58%
42% 42
Code Coverage
43 43%
57% 57
Code Review
100 100%
0% 0
Code Quality
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Clang Static Analyzer and Source-Navigator NG. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Clang Static Analyzer seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Clang Static Analyzer mentions (7)

  • Improvements to static analysis in GCC 14
    Clang has a similar tool, the Clang Static Analyzer: https://clang-analyzer.llvm.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Memory Safe or Bust?
    Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment [CI/CD] pipelines play a crucial role in enforcing code quality, especially when working with memory-unsafe languages. By integrating automated dynamic analysis tools like Valgrind or AddressSanitizer, static analysis tools like Clang Static Analyzer or cppcheck, and manual code review processes, developers can identify and mitigate many memory-related... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Static Code analysis
    No one static analyzer catches everything. It's best to run multiple. Popular ones are cppcheck, clang-analyzer, GCC static analyzer in GCC 10+, flawfinder, lizard. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Checked C
    With "cross translation units" (CTU) analysis a static analyzer could derive a constraint on `some_function` return value and check this against the array size to detect a possible bug. The Clang static analyzer [1], used through CodeChecker (CC) [2], do support CTU (enabled with `--ctu`). I'm very happy with the result on the code I'm working on. Of course this is not magic, and it's important to understand the... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • What's in your tool belt?
    Cppcheck and Clang Analyzer: statically analyze your code to find bad style and bugs (undefined behavior) respectively. Clang Analyzer can actually be frighteningly clever and has a low false positive rate (unlike most other non-commercial static checkers). Source: almost 3 years ago
View more

Source-Navigator NG mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Source-Navigator NG yet. Tracking of Source-Navigator NG recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Clang Static Analyzer and Source-Navigator NG, you can also consider the following products

Cppcheck - Cppcheck is an analysis tool for C/C++ code. It detects the types of bugs that the compilers normally fail to detect. The goal is no false positives. CppCheckDownload cppcheck for free.

Source Insight - Source Insight is a programming editor & code browser with built-in live analysis for C/C++, C#, Java, and more; helping you understand large projects.

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.

Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free

CodeClimate - Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.