Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Cisco Network Assistant VS Fping (open source)

Compare Cisco Network Assistant VS Fping (open source) and see what are their differences

Cisco Network Assistant logo Cisco Network Assistant

Cisco Network Assistant simplifies wired and wireless network management, and provides critical product information using Cisco Active Advisor.

Fping (open source) logo Fping (open source)

fping is a program to send ICMP echo probes to network hosts, similar to ping, but much better performing when pinging multiple hosts.
  • Cisco Network Assistant Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-19
  • Fping (open source) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-02-14

Cisco Network Assistant features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Cisco Network Assistant offers an intuitive and easy-to-navigate GUI, which makes it accessible even for less experienced network administrators.
  • Comprehensive Device Management
    It provides robust management capabilities for a wide range of Cisco devices, including routers, switches, and access points, allowing for centralized control and monitoring.
  • Simplified Troubleshooting
    The tool includes features for quick troubleshooting, including graphical topologies and real-time alerts, helping administrators to diagnose and resolve issues efficiently.
  • Automatic Configuration
    Cisco Network Assistant supports automatic configuration and deployment, which can save time and reduce human error during the setup and management of network devices.
  • Cost-Effective
    As a free tool provided by Cisco, it can be a cost-effective solution for managing small to medium-sized networks without the need for additional software investment.

Possible disadvantages of Cisco Network Assistant

  • Limited Scalability
    Cisco Network Assistant is designed primarily for small to medium-sized networks and may not be suitable for large-scale enterprise environments.
  • Cisco Device Restriction
    The tool is specifically tailored for Cisco products, which makes it less versatile for environments that use a mix of different hardware vendors.
  • Basic Functionality
    While it covers essential network management tasks, Cisco Network Assistant lacks some of the advanced features and granular control offered by higher-end Cisco management tools like Cisco Prime.
  • Limited Updates and Support
    Given its positioning as a free tool, it may not receive as frequent updates or comprehensive support as paid Cisco solutions, potentially leading to compatibility or security issues over time.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While the basic interface is user-friendly, some of the more advanced features can have a learning curve and may require additional training or experience to utilize effectively.

Fping (open source) features and specs

  • Speed
    Fping is designed to send out multiple ICMP Echo Requests in parallel, allowing it to quickly scan large numbers of hosts compared to traditional ping commands.
  • Scripting Friendly
    Fping is suitable for use in shell scripts due to its output format, making it useful for automated network monitoring and management tasks.
  • IPv4 and IPv6 Support
    Fping supports both IPv4 and IPv6, providing flexibility for various network environments.
  • Customizable Options
    It offers a wide range of options for setting the number of pings, intervals, and timing, allowing users to tailor the tool to suit specific needs.
  • Resource Efficiency
    Fping consumes fewer system resources compared to some GUI-based network tools, making it ideal for running on servers and low-power devices.

Possible disadvantages of Fping (open source)

  • Command-Line Interface Only
    Fping does not have a graphical user interface, which may make it less accessible to users who are not familiar with command-line operations.
  • Advanced Configuration Complexity
    While it is highly configurable, the range of options and parameters can be overwhelming for new users who may not have a deep understanding of networking.
  • Limited To Echo Requests
    Fping is designed specifically for ICMP Echo Requests, limiting its usefulness for scenarios that require more in-depth network diagnostics.
  • Lack of Built-In Analysis
    Unlike some more comprehensive network monitoring tools, Fping does not include features for detailed analysis and visualization of network data.
  • Potential Security Restrictions
    Some networks may have security policies that restrict the use of ICMP packets, which could limit Fping's effectiveness or even prevent it from functioning.

Cisco Network Assistant videos

Cisco Network Assistant

Fping (open source) videos

No Fping (open source) videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Cisco Network Assistant and Fping (open source))
Monitoring Tools
59 59%
41% 41
Log Management
70 70%
30% 30
Security
0 0%
100% 100
Network Scanning
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Cisco Network Assistant and Fping (open source). For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Cisco Network Assistant and Fping (open source), you can also consider the following products

Cisco DNA Center - Find and resolve network issues with Cisco DNA Center. Provides software-based network automation and assurance. Control and manage intent-based networks.

Ping Meter Gadget - Customizable, graphical, semi-transparent ping (latency) meter.

Nmap - Nmap Free Security Scanner, Port Scanner, & Network Exploration Tool. Download open source software for Linux, Windows, UNIX, FreeBSD, etc.

PingInfoView - PingInfoView is a small utility that allows you to easily ping multiple host names and IP addresses, and watch the result in one table.

Auvik - Auvik’s network infrastructure RMM gives IT service providers better visibility, documentation, and...

Open Nettest - Open Nettest is a platform for collecting, processing and visualizing data related QoS and QoE.