Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Cisco IronPort Web Security Appliance VS cPGuard

Compare Cisco IronPort Web Security Appliance VS cPGuard and see what are their differences

Cisco IronPort Web Security Appliance logo Cisco IronPort Web Security Appliance

Cisco IronPort Web Security Appliance

cPGuard logo cPGuard

cPGuard is Security Suite for Linux Web Hosting Servers
  • Cisco IronPort Web Security Appliance Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-23
  • cPGuard Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-08

cPGuard is a security suite that contains anti-virus/anti-malware scanner, file injection cleanup option, WAF, distributed firewall, server reputation check, rootkit scanner, etc . Using this complete security package, the server administration time reduces a lot due to web attacks and hacks.

cPGuard

$ Details
freemium $6.0 / Monthly (50 Users per server )
Platforms
Web Linux Wordpress PHP Apache NGINX Web
Release Date
2017 July

Cisco IronPort Web Security Appliance features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

cPGuard features and specs

  • Antivirus audit: Yes
  • WAF: Yes
  • Firewall: Yes
  • Process monitors: Yes
  • Malware Cleanup: Yes
  • Email / Web Hook / Custom Notifications: Yes
  • Web bot attack mitigation: Yes
  • Web Malware Scanner: Yes
  • IP Reputation checks: Yes
  • Domain Reputation Checks: Yes
  • Rootkit Scanner: Yes

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Cisco IronPort Web Security Appliance and cPGuard)
Security & Privacy
67 67%
33% 33
Cyber Security
65 65%
35% 35
Monitoring Tools
73 73%
27% 27
Web Application Security
0 0%
100% 100

Questions and Answers

As answered by people managing Cisco IronPort Web Security Appliance and cPGuard.

What makes your product unique?

cPGuard's answer:

cPGuard is a comprehensive security suite for Linux Web Servers in multiple platforms and control panels. It is the only cost-effective solution in its range

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

cPGuard's answer:

Limited resource usage, quality of the software and support, helps to reduce license cost with its cheap licensing model

User comments

Share your experience with using Cisco IronPort Web Security Appliance and cPGuard. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Cisco IronPort Web Security Appliance and cPGuard, you can also consider the following products

Palo Alto Networks WildFire - Firewall and Threat Intelligence

kicom - KicomAV is an open source (GPL v2) antivirus engine designed for detecting malware and disinfecting...

FireEye Security Suite - An enterprise-grade security solution for mid-market customers, combining detection, protection, and response capabilities for network, email and endpoint.

Pyxsoft Antimalware - More than 4.000.000 of known virus and an Advanced Code Analysis Engine allows Pyxsoft Anti Malware...

Zscaler Web Security - Zscaler offers cloud-based web security solutions.

Imunify360 - Imunify360 is a comprehensive security suite for Linux web servers. It includes antivirus, firewall, WAF, PHP Security Layers, Patch Management, Domain reputation with easy UI and advanced automation.