Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CipherShed VS Microsoft BitLocker

Compare CipherShed VS Microsoft BitLocker and see what are their differences

CipherShed logo CipherShed

CipherShed is a program that can be used to create encrypted files or encrypt entire drives...

Microsoft BitLocker logo Microsoft BitLocker

BitLocker is a full disk encryption feature included with Windows Vista and later.
  • CipherShed Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-01
  • Microsoft BitLocker Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-25

CipherShed features and specs

  • Open Source
    CipherShed is an open-source project, which means its code is available for anyone to inspect, ensuring transparency and the ability to verify its security.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    CipherShed is designed to work on multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, providing flexibility for users across different platforms.
  • Encryption Strength
    CipherShed employs strong encryption algorithms to ensure data security, which is crucial for protecting sensitive information from unauthorized access.
  • Community-Driven Development
    As an open-source project, CipherShed benefits from community input and contributions, which can lead to continuous improvement and innovation.

Possible disadvantages of CipherShed

  • Development Status
    CipherShed's development has been slow or inactive at times, which can be a concern for users who rely on regular updates and timely bug fixes.
  • Complexity
    The software may be complex for users who are not familiar with encryption tools, potentially leading to misuse or misunderstanding of its capabilities.
  • Lack of Official Support
    As a community-driven open-source project, CipherShed may not offer official support or dedicated customer service, which can be a drawback for users needing assistance.
  • Legacy Codebase
    CipherShed originates from the TrueCrypt codebase, which, while audited, is relatively old and might not incorporate the latest security practices and standards.

Microsoft BitLocker features and specs

  • Strong Security
    BitLocker provides robust encryption algorithms like AES to protect data at rest, ensuring that unauthorized users cannot access your data even if they have physical access to the device.
  • Seamless Integration
    As a native feature of Windows, BitLocker integrates seamlessly with the operating system, making it easy to deploy and manage within a Windows-based environment.
  • TPM Support
    BitLocker leverages Trusted Platform Module (TPM) hardware to provide enhanced security, such as allowing non-TPM systems to use a USB startup key instead.
  • Enterprise Management Tools
    BitLocker can be managed using Active Directory, Group Policy, and Microsoft Endpoint Manager, enabling IT administrators to enforce encryption policies and recover keys efficiently.
  • Transparent Encryption
    Once BitLocker is set up, it works in the background without requiring user intervention, offering a smooth and transparent user experience.

Possible disadvantages of Microsoft BitLocker

  • Performance Overhead
    Encrypting and decrypting data on the fly can slow down system performance, particularly on older or less powerful hardware.
  • Limited Non-Windows Support
    BitLocker is primarily designed for Windows operating systems, which limits its effectiveness and usability on non-Windows platforms.
  • Complex Recovery Process
    If a user loses their BitLocker recovery key, recovering the encrypted data can be complicated and, in worst-case scenarios, impossible.
  • Initial Setup Complexity
    Setting up BitLocker requires understanding various options and configurations, such as TPM settings and key management, which can be daunting for inexperienced users.
  • Cost
    BitLocker is available only with certain editions of Windows, such as Professional and Enterprise, meaning users may need to upgrade from a basic edition, which could incur additional costs.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CipherShed and Microsoft BitLocker)
Security & Privacy
14 14%
86% 86
Encryption
23 23%
77% 77
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
100% 100
File Encryption
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using CipherShed and Microsoft BitLocker. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare CipherShed and Microsoft BitLocker

CipherShed Reviews

Best Disk Encryption Software – the 5 top tools to secure your data
Like VeraCrypt, CipherShed started as a fork of TrueCrypt. It’s available for Windows PC, Mac OSX, and Linux, although it must be compiled for the latter two. The first non-alpha version was released in February this year, but there’s still no product (v1.0 or later) release.

Microsoft BitLocker Reviews

Best Disk Encryption Software – the 5 top tools to secure your data
Bitlocker is popular Windows-only software used to encrypt entire volumes using the AES encryption algorithm with a 128- or 256-bit key. Unlike TrueCrypt and VeraCrypt, Bitlocker cannot create encrypted containers. Entire partitions must be encrypted at once.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CipherShed and Microsoft BitLocker, you can also consider the following products

VeraCrypt - VeraCrypt is a free open source disk encryption software for Windows, Mac OSX and Linux.

Symantec Data Loss Prevention - Fully protect your data with the comprehensive detection technologies and unified policies of Symantec's industry leading Data Loss Prevention (DLP).

Cryptomator - When it comes to saving your files on a cloud server, it is important to ensure the security of those files. Keeping your delicate files out of the wrong hands can save you a lot of time and hassle. Read more about Cryptomator.

Paubox - Paubox provides HIPAA compliant email encryption without the hassle of extra steps.

EncFS - EncFS provides an encrypted filesystem in user-space.

OpenSSH - OpenSSH is a free version of the SSH connectivity tools that technical users rely on.