Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Cinder VS Processing.js

Compare Cinder VS Processing.js and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Cinder logo Cinder

CINDER PROVIDES A POWERFUL, INTUITIVE TOOLBOX for programming graphics, audio, video, networking...

Processing.js logo Processing.js

Processing.js is an open programming language, port of the ...
  • Cinder Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-14
  • Processing.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-16

Cinder features and specs

  • High Performance
    Cinder is designed with performance in mind, leveraging hardware acceleration and modern graphics APIs like OpenGL, making it suitable for applications that require real-time rendering and fast processing.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Cinder supports multiple platforms including Windows, macOS, Linux, and iOS, allowing developers to write their code once and deploy across different devices with minimal modifications.
  • Extensive Feature Set
    Cinder provides a rich set of features for graphics programming, including typography, image processing, shaders, and 3D rendering, making it a versatile tool for creative coding.
  • Active Community and Resources
    There is an active community of developers contributing to Cinder, offering forums, tutorials, and plugins, which can be valuable resources for learning and troubleshooting.

Possible disadvantages of Cinder

  • Steep Learning Curve
    For beginners, Cinder can be difficult to learn due to its comprehensive feature set and the complexities of graphics programming concepts.
  • Limited GUI Components
    Cinder lacks built-in support for GUI components, which means developers may need to implement their own or rely on third-party libraries for interface elements.
  • Sparse Documentation
    While there are resources available, some areas of Cinder lack comprehensive official documentation, which can pose challenges for developers new to the framework.
  • Dependency Management
    Cinder projects often require external dependencies that need to be managed manually, which can add complexity to the setup and deployment process.

Processing.js features and specs

  • Easy Transition from Processing
    Processing.js allows developers familiar with the Processing programming language to easily transition their applications to the web environment without needing to rewrite significant portions of code.
  • Web-based Graphics
    Developers can leverage Processing.js to create visually appealing graphics that run directly in a web browser, eschewing the need for additional software like Java applets.
  • Interactive Visualizations
    The library supports dynamic and interactive visualizations, making it ideal for projects that require animated graphics and user interaction.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source project, Processing.js fosters a community-driven development model where developers can contribute to and expand the library’s capabilities.
  • Quick Setup
    Processing.js requires only a simple script inclusion to start developing, making it relatively easy and quick to set up for those wanting to prototype graphics quickly.

Possible disadvantages of Processing.js

  • Performance Overhead
    Running animations and graphics through a JavaScript library in the browser can have performance limitations, especially when dealing with complex or resource-intensive tasks.
  • Browser Compatibility Issues
    Processing.js can have compatibility issues with different web browsers, which can lead to inconsistent visualizations across platforms.
  • Limited Community and Support
    The library has a relatively smaller user base compared to more recent JavaScript graphics libraries, meaning less community support and fewer updates.
  • Deprecated
    The project is effectively deprecated, as it hasn't received updates in recent years, and modern alternatives like p5.js offer more features and active development.
  • Not Full JavaScript Utility
    Since it's primarily designed to replicate the Processing language, it may not always take full advantage of typical JavaScript idioms or integrate seamlessly with other JavaScript frameworks.

Cinder videos

CINDER BY MARISSA MEYER | booktalk with XTINEMAY

More videos:

  • Review - CINDER BY MARISSA MEYER
  • Review - Adidas YEEZY 350 V2 CINDER Review & On Feet

Processing.js videos

No Processing.js videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Cinder and Processing.js)
3D
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
100% 100
VJ
100 100%
0% 0
Flowcharts
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Cinder and Processing.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Cinder and Processing.js

Cinder Reviews

We have no reviews of Cinder yet.
Be the first one to post

Processing.js Reviews

The Best Data Visualization Tools - Top 30 BI Software
Processing.js is a JavaScript library that uses the Processing visual programming language. It is web-oriented and lets you bring the power of Processing to create data visualizations for your web pages. Processing.js requires an HTML5-compatible browser to work.
Source: improvado.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Cinder seems to be a lot more popular than Processing.js. While we know about 14 links to Cinder, we've tracked only 1 mention of Processing.js. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Cinder mentions (14)

  • UI framework with C++ simulation.
    Have you come across openFrameworks (https://openframeworks.cc/) or Cinder (https://libcinder.org/)? Source: about 2 years ago
  • SDL, SFML, other libraries for game development in C++...?
    I only used SFML, currently making a 2D isometric game. I really like it so far overall, easy to use IMO, pretty well documented. Does what I need it to do. Heard good things about SDL2 and also Cinder++ (https://libcinder.org/) also. Source: over 2 years ago
  • GUI Tips C++
    What kind of game? You might be better off using a game engine unless it's more of a simple starter project. Check out https://libcinder.org/ or see lots of engines here: https://github.com/collections/game-engines. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Something like p5.js but for C++
    Try Cinder (https://libcinder.org/). I have not tried it myself but it seems to have the same goals as P5 and Processing (ie. Creative coding). Source: about 3 years ago
  • How the Cinder JIT’s inliner works
    Kind of a shorty thing for Meta to do when Cinder is already taken by https://libcinder.org. Source: about 3 years ago
View more

Processing.js mentions (1)

  • What are the main differences between processing.js and processing.py?
    With processing.js I think you mean p5.js, since the development of processing.js has been archived in 2018 (https://github.com/processing-js/processing-js ). Source: over 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Cinder and Processing.js, you can also consider the following products

Processing - C++ and Java programming at the speed of thought.

p5.js - JS library for creating graphic and interactive experiences

OpenFrameworks - openFrameworks

Paper.js - Open source vector graphics scripting framework that runs on top of the HTML5 Canvas.

Vvvv - vvvv is a graphical programming environment for easy prototyping and development.

GoJS - GoJS is a JavaScript library for building interactive diagrams on HTML web pages. Build apps with flowcharts, org charts, BPMN, UML, modeling, and other visual graph types.