Chocolatey VS Parcel

Chocolatey Reviews

Parcel Reviews

Chocolatey mentions (252)

• Let’s build AI-tools with the help of AI and Typescript!

  Chocolatey Windows software management solution, we use this for installing Python and Deno. - Source: dev.to / 23 days ago

• Giving Kyma a little spin ... a SpinKube

  Authenticating with Kyma is a (in my opinion) unnecessary challenge as it leverages the OIDC-login plugin for kubectl. You find a description of the setup here. This works fine when on a Mac but can give you some headaches on a Windows and on Linux machine especially when combined with restrictive setups in corporate environments. For Windows I can only recommend installing krew via chocolatey and then install the... - Source: dev.to / 30 days ago

• Effective Neovim Setup. A Beginner’s Guide

  On a Windows machine, you can use Chocolatey by running the command. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago

• Need Help with getting Haskell onto my Windows Laptop

  I've used WSL2 and GHC/Nix--worked without any issues. However, there is Chocolatey: https://chocolatey.org/. Source: 5 months ago

• Python Versions and Release Cycles

  For OSX there is homebrew or pyenv (pyenv is another solution on Linux). As pyenv compiles from source it will require setting up XCode (the Apple IDE) tools to support this which can be pretty bulky. Windows users have chocolatey but the issue there is it works off the binaries. That means it won't have the latest security release available since those are source only. Conda is also another solution which can be... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

Parcel mentions (102)

• How and why do we bundle zx?

  At first we wanted to just get rid of all the helper utilities. Keep only the kernel, but this would mean a loss of backward compatibility. We needed some efficient code processing instead with recomposition and tree-shaking. We needed a bundler. But which one? Our testing approach relies on targets, not sources. We rebuilt the project frequently, speed was critical requirement. In essence, we chose a solution... - Source: dev.to / 3 days ago

• DEMO - Voice to PDF - Complete PDF documents with voice commands using the Claude 3 Opus API

  It runs using Parcel, very simple and easy to setup. The app has 3 files:. - Source: dev.to / 10 days ago

• React Server Components Example with Next.js

  In the Changelog Podcast episode referenced above, Dan Abramov alluded to Parcel working on RSC support as well. I couldn’t find much to back up that claim aside from a GitHub issue discussing directives and a social media post by Devon Govett (creator of Parcel), so I can’t say for sure if Parcel is currently a viable option for developing with RSCs. - Source: dev.to / 22 days ago

• Build a Vite 5 backend integration with Flask

  Once you build a simple Vite backend integration, try not to complicate Vite's configuration unless you absolutely must. Vite has become one of the most popular bundlers in the frontend space, but it wasn't the first and it certainly won't be the last. In my 7 years of building for the web, I've used Grunt, Gulp, Webpack, esbuild, and Parcel. Snowpack and Rome came-and-went before I ever had a chance to try them.... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• Building Node.js applications without dependencies

  I’ve tried something similar on the frontend side: I decided to build a UI for Ollama.ai using only HTML, CSS, and JS (Single-Page Application). The goal is to learn something new and have zero runtime dependencies on other projects and NPM modules. Only Node and Parcel.js (https://parceljs.org/) are needed during development for serving files, bundling, etc. The only runtime dependency is a modern browser. Here's... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago