Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Chameleon VS BrowserStack

Compare Chameleon VS BrowserStack and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Chameleon logo Chameleon

A platform for better user onboarding. Build, manage and improve product tours without code.

BrowserStack logo BrowserStack

BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.
  • Chameleon Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-07
  • BrowserStack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2025-05-06

BrowserStack is a leading software testing platform powering over two million tests every day across 15 global data centers. With BrowserStack, developers can comprehensively test their websites and mobile applications across 2,000+ real mobile devices and browsers in a single cloud platform—and at scale. BrowserStack helps Tesco, Shell, NVIDIA, Discovery, Wells Fargo, and over 50,000 customers deliver quality software at speed.

BrowserStack

$ Details
freemium $29.0 / Monthly (Starts at single user plans and billed annually)
Platforms
Mac OSX Android Windows Browser Web iOS Google Chrome Firefox Safari REST API Internet Explorer
Release Date
2012 September
Startup details
Country
Ireland
State
Dublin
City
Dublin
Founder(s)
Nakul Aggarwal
Employees
500 - 999

Chameleon features and specs

  • Customization
    Chameleon offers extensive customization options for user onboarding flows, allowing businesses to tailor the experiences to match their brand and specific user needs.
  • User Segmentation
    The platform provides robust user segmentation features, enabling targeted in-app tours and experiences based on user behavior, demographics, and other criteria.
  • Analytics
    Comprehensive analytics are available to track the effectiveness of onboarding experiences, including metrics such as user engagement and completion rates.
  • Integration
    Chameleon integrates well with other essential tools like CRM, marketing automation, and other analytics platforms, providing a seamless workflow.
  • No-Code Interface
    The platform features a no-code interface, which allows non-technical team members to create and manage user experiences without requiring developer input.

Possible disadvantages of Chameleon

  • Pricing
    Chameleon can be relatively expensive, especially for smaller businesses or startups with limited budgets, with costs rising as more features and higher usage thresholds are needed.
  • Learning Curve
    While powerful, the platform has a bit of a learning curve for new users, especially for those unfamiliar with user onboarding tools.
  • Performance
    Some users have reported performance issues, such as longer load times for onboarding experiences, which can affect the user experience.
  • Feature Complexity
    The extensive feature set can sometimes be overwhelming for new users, making it difficult to fully utilize all the available functionalities without dedicated time for learning.
  • Support
    While Chameleon offers support, some users have found the responsiveness and helpfulness of customer support to be lacking, especially when dealing with more complex issues.

BrowserStack features and specs

  • Cloud-based
  • Browser Extensions
  • SaaS

Chameleon videos

Panther Chameleon, The Best Pet Lizard?

More videos:

  • Review - Chameleon Kit Setup + Review! | My Honest Opinion On The Reptibreeze Chameleon Kit
  • Review - The Chameleon Review - with Tom Vasel
  • Demo - Chameleon - Better User Onboarding

BrowserStack videos

BrowserStack Overview

More videos:

  • Tutorial - SpeedLab by BrowserStack
  • Review - SharePoint Team Finds BrowserStack Invaluable

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Chameleon and BrowserStack)
User Onboarding And Engagement
Website Testing
0 0%
100% 100
User Experience
100 100%
0% 0
Browser Testing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Chameleon and BrowserStack. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Chameleon and BrowserStack

Chameleon Reviews

15 best user onboarding software you need to try in 2023
As their brand name suggests, Chameleon want to be about product development and customer analytics as much as education or user capture. They’ve devised a workflow that tailors tours to feedback, which should prove popular both with users, for whom the experience is personalized, and app creators, who see an improved conversion and churn rate.

BrowserStack Reviews

Top Selenium Alternatives
BrowserStack is another leading cloud-based testing platform that offers access to a vast array of browsers and real mobile devices. It's designed to simplify the testing process by allowing tests to run in parallel across different environments, significantly reducing the time needed for comprehensive testing. BrowserStack features include live, interactive testing,...
Source: bugbug.io
Why choose HeadSpin over BrowserStack?
Companies like HeadSpin and BrowserStack play a significant role in fulfilling the demand for testing on real devices and cross-browser devices. Their ability to test on real devices online and monitor digital experiences adds to the value proposition of organizations implementing testing solutions. However, every company has different requirements and here are a few reasons...
Source: www.headspin.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, BrowserStack should be more popular than Chameleon. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Chameleon mentions (3)

  • Ask HN: Who is hiring? (May 2024)
    Chameleon | Fullstack Engineer (Ruby) | Remote before it was cool | $120k - $180k | Full-time | https://chameleon.io. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Ask HN: Who is hiring? (April 2024)
    Chameleon | Frontend Engineer (React) + Fullstack Engineer (Ruby) | Remote before it was cool | $120k - $180k | Full-time | https://chameleon.io Remember those modals, tooltips and checklists you have built but never really wanted to?! With Chameleon, the Product team can WYSIWYG those into your application with just a few clicks. We're a great, growing team looking to hire a Frontend and Fullstack Engineer to... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Ask HN: Who is hiring? (April 2021)
    Chameleon | Full Stack Rails Engineer + React | Remote before it was cool | Full-time | https://trychameleon.com Remember those modals, tooltips and checklists you have built but never really wanted to?! With Chameleon, the Product team can WYSIWYG those into your application with just a few clicks. We're a great, growing team looking to hire 2 Full Stack Engineers to complement our existing expertise. Take a look... - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago

BrowserStack mentions (7)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Chameleon and BrowserStack, you can also consider the following products

Appcues - Improve user onboarding, feature activation & more — no code required! Stop waiting on dev and start increasing customer engagement today. Try it for free.

LambdaTest - Perform Web Testing on 2000+ Browsers & OS

UserGuiding - Create in-app experiences with the most straightforward product adoption platform — quick implementation, lasting user engagement.

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

Userlane - Digital adoption platform with interactive guidance for software applications allowing anyone to understand and master any software from the get-go.

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.