Celery VS HiveMQ

Compare Celery VS HiveMQ and see what are their differences

Cyclr

Powerful SaaS integration toolkit for SaaS developers - create, amplify, manage and publish native integrations from within your app with Cyclr's flexible Embedded iPaaS. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

Celery

Celery helps innovative companies set up pre-order or custom crowdfunding campaigns anywhere.

HiveMQ

HiveMQ is the MQTT based messaging platform for fast, efficient and reliable data movement to and from connected IoT devices and enterprise systems

Landing page //
2021-10-19

Landing page //
2023-10-02

Medical Medium Anthony William on the Dos and Don’ts of Celery Juice

HiveMQ videos

+ Add

HiveMQ - Enabling the Connected Car

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Celery and HiveMQ)

HiveMQ

Data Integration

22 22%

Data Integration

78% 78

IoT Connectivity

0 0%

IoT Connectivity

100% 100

Stream Processing

100 100%

Stream Processing

0% 0

Web Service Automation

18 18%

Web Service Automation

82% 82

User comments

Share your experience with using Celery and HiveMQ. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, HiveMQ seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Celery mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Celery yet. Tracking of Celery recommendations started around Mar 2021.

HiveMQ mentions (3)

A beginner's end-to-end project: Raspberry Pi sensor data to dashboard -- I need some general advice getting started
Do you have a preference over cloudmqtt.com or hivemq.com? Does Azure this functionality? Source: over 1 year ago
A beginner's end-to-end project: Raspberry Pi sensor data to dashboard -- I need some general advice getting started
If it's IoT data, I would first send it to a Cloud MQTT Broker (cloudmqtt.com or hivemq.com). These brokers handle the spotty unstable connectivity between themselves and MQTT/IoT devices or clients. Other systems will not handle this instability in connectivity very well. Source: over 1 year ago
Ask HN: Who is hiring? (September 2021)
HiveMQ | Landshut & Remote from: Germany, UK, Spain, Austria, Switzerland | Site Reliability Engineer / Full Stack Engineer HiveMQ (https://hivemq.com) is providing a highly scalable and reliable MQTT broker that has already been battle-tested by German industry leaders ranging from the automotive and energy industry to major Internet Service providers. Tech stack: Java, VueJS, Kubernetes, AWS/Azure,... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Celery and HiveMQ, you can also consider the following products

Enqueue It - Easy and scalable solution for manage and execute background tasks seamlessly in .NET applications. It allows you to schedule, queue, and process your jobs and microservices efficiently.

mosquitto - Eclipse Mosquitto is an open source (EPL/EDL licensed) message broker that implements the MQTT protocol versions 5.0, 3.1.1 and 3.1. Mosquitto is lightweight and is suitable for use on all devices

Hangfire - An easy way to perform background processing in .NET and .NET Core applications.

EMQX - EMQX is an open source MQTT 5.0 broker for mission-critical IoT scenarios, massively scalable and highly available clustering, running anywhere from edge to cloud.

Sidekiq - Sidekiq is a simple, efficient framework for background job processing in Ruby

RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.