Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Cavisson NetStorm VS WebLOAD

Compare Cavisson NetStorm VS WebLOAD and see what are their differences

Cavisson NetStorm logo Cavisson NetStorm

A Leading provider of performance testing, monitoring and diagnostics software to improve quality, performance and availability of enterprise applications.

WebLOAD logo WebLOAD

WebLOAD - The most flexible and cost effective software for enterprise load, stress and performance testing, integrated with DevOps processes. Click for details
  • Cavisson NetStorm Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-11
  • WebLOAD Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-20

Cavisson NetStorm features and specs

  • Comprehensive Performance Testing
    Cavisson NetStorm offers a wide range of performance testing capabilities, such as load testing, stress testing, and endurance testing, which allow organizations to evaluate their applications under various conditions.
  • Real-time Monitoring
    It provides real-time monitoring and diagnostics, which help teams identify performance bottlenecks and address them promptly during testing phases.
  • User-friendly Interface
    NetStorm features an intuitive and user-friendly interface that makes it easier for testers to design and execute test scenarios.
  • Scalability
    Cavisson NetStorm is designed to handle large-scale testing scenarios, making it suitable for organizations with extensive testing needs.
  • Integration Capabilities
    It supports integration with various CI/CD tools, which facilitates continuous performance testing within DevOps pipelines.

Possible disadvantages of Cavisson NetStorm

  • Complexity in Initial Setup
    The initial setup and configuration of NetStorm can be complex, requiring a steep learning curve for new users.
  • High Cost
    For small organizations, the licensing cost of Cavisson NetStorm can be prohibitive, especially when compared to other performance testing tools available in the market.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running NetStorm can be resource-intensive, potentially requiring significant computational power and memory to perform large-scale tests.
  • Limited Community Support
    Compared to open-source alternatives, Cavisson NetStorm has a smaller community, which might limit the availability of user-generated resources and shared knowledge.
  • Potential Overhead
    Integrating NetStorm into existing systems may introduce some overhead, especially in environments that are not initially prepared for sophisticated performance testing tools.

WebLOAD features and specs

  • Scalability
    WebLOAD can handle large-scale performance testing, from a few virtual users to millions, making it suitable for large enterprise applications.
  • Comprehensive Protocol Support
    Supports a wide range of protocols such as HTTP/HTTPS, SOAP, REST, and WebSocket, allowing it to test diverse web applications.
  • Real-Time Analytics
    Provides real-time monitoring and analytics, giving immediate insights into performance bottlenecks and system behavior during tests.
  • JavaScript Scripting
    Uses JavaScript for scripting, providing flexibility and familiarity for web developers to create complex test scenarios.
  • Cloud Integration
    Offers seamless integration with cloud platforms like AWS and Azure, enabling distributed testing without infrastructure constraints.
  • Ease of Use
    Has a user-friendly interface and comprehensive documentation, making it relatively easy for new users to get started.

Possible disadvantages of WebLOAD

  • Cost
    WebLOAD is a commercial tool with a potentially high cost, which might be prohibitive for small businesses or individual developers.
  • Steeper Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic features are user-friendly, mastering more advanced features and customizations can require significant time and effort.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running large-scale performance tests can be resource-heavy, requiring significant computational power and memory.
  • Limited Third-Party Integrations
    While it offers some integrations, the range is more limited compared to other performance testing tools, potentially limiting its utility in diverse development environments.
  • Customer Support
    Some users have reported that customer support can be slow or less responsive, which can be a bottleneck during critical testing phases.

Cavisson NetStorm videos

No Cavisson NetStorm videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

WebLOAD videos

WebLOAD load testing tool overview

More videos:

  • Review - WebLOAD IDE - Recording a Script
  • Review - Load testing WebServices with WebLOAD

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Cavisson NetStorm and WebLOAD)
Monitoring Tools
23 23%
77% 77
Website Testing
21 21%
79% 79
Development
23 23%
77% 77
Online Services
18 18%
82% 82

User comments

Share your experience with using Cavisson NetStorm and WebLOAD. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Cavisson NetStorm and WebLOAD, you can also consider the following products

StresStimulus - Load testing tool for websites and mobile that works with hard-to-test applications.

OctoPerf - OctoPerf is a SaaS load testing solution, based on JMeter.

LoadComplete - The only load testing tool to record, replay, and test in real browsers at scale.

SmartMeter.io - Performance Testing with Enterprise-Level Features with a familiar jMeter interface

LoadView - LoadView is a cloud-based load testing platform that allows users to stress-test their websites and web apps to know their performance level.

k6 Cloud - Managed load testing service built on top of the popular open-source project k6.