Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Cavisson NetStorm VS LoadComplete

Compare Cavisson NetStorm VS LoadComplete and see what are their differences

Cavisson NetStorm logo Cavisson NetStorm

A Leading provider of performance testing, monitoring and diagnostics software to improve quality, performance and availability of enterprise applications.

LoadComplete logo LoadComplete

The only load testing tool to record, replay, and test in real browsers at scale.
  • Cavisson NetStorm Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-11
  • LoadComplete Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-10-01

Cavisson NetStorm features and specs

  • Comprehensive Performance Testing
    Cavisson NetStorm offers a wide range of performance testing capabilities, such as load testing, stress testing, and endurance testing, which allow organizations to evaluate their applications under various conditions.
  • Real-time Monitoring
    It provides real-time monitoring and diagnostics, which help teams identify performance bottlenecks and address them promptly during testing phases.
  • User-friendly Interface
    NetStorm features an intuitive and user-friendly interface that makes it easier for testers to design and execute test scenarios.
  • Scalability
    Cavisson NetStorm is designed to handle large-scale testing scenarios, making it suitable for organizations with extensive testing needs.
  • Integration Capabilities
    It supports integration with various CI/CD tools, which facilitates continuous performance testing within DevOps pipelines.

Possible disadvantages of Cavisson NetStorm

  • Complexity in Initial Setup
    The initial setup and configuration of NetStorm can be complex, requiring a steep learning curve for new users.
  • High Cost
    For small organizations, the licensing cost of Cavisson NetStorm can be prohibitive, especially when compared to other performance testing tools available in the market.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running NetStorm can be resource-intensive, potentially requiring significant computational power and memory to perform large-scale tests.
  • Limited Community Support
    Compared to open-source alternatives, Cavisson NetStorm has a smaller community, which might limit the availability of user-generated resources and shared knowledge.
  • Potential Overhead
    Integrating NetStorm into existing systems may introduce some overhead, especially in environments that are not initially prepared for sophisticated performance testing tools.

LoadComplete features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    LoadComplete offers an intuitive interface that allows users to easily set up and execute load tests without needing extensive technical knowledge.
  • Comprehensive Reporting
    The tool provides detailed reports and analytics, making it easier for users to understand performance metrics and identify bottlenecks.
  • Integration Capabilities
    LoadComplete integrates well with various CI/CD tools, enhancing its utility in automated testing environments.
  • Real Browser Testing
    It enables testing using real browsers, ensuring that load tests closely simulate real user interactions and provide more accurate performance data.

Possible disadvantages of LoadComplete

  • Cost
    The pricing of LoadComplete can be high for small organizations or individuals, potentially limiting its accessibility for budget-conscious users.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running extensive tests may require significant computing resources, which could impact other operations if not managed properly.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its usability, some aspects of the tool might have a learning curve, especially for users unfamiliar with load testing concepts.
  • Limited Protocol Support
    Compared to some other load testing tools, LoadComplete may support fewer protocols, which could be a limitation for testing complex systems.

Analysis of LoadComplete

Overall verdict

  • LoadComplete (LoadNinja) is a powerful and reliable tool for teams looking for a comprehensive, scalable solution to performance testing. It's especially beneficial for teams that require ease of use and the ability to quickly execute and iterate tests without deep technical expertise in testing frameworks.

Why this product is good

  • LoadComplete, or LoadNinja, is renowned for its user-friendly interface and robust performance testing capabilities. It allows testers to create and execute performance tests without extensive programming knowledge, making it accessible to various users. Its cloud-based infrastructure facilitates realistic load testing scenarios by simulating thousands of users without the need for significant hardware investments. Additionally, its integration capabilities with popular CI/CD tools streamline the testing process within modern development workflows. LoadComplete also provides detailed analytics and reporting, helping teams identify performance bottlenecks and optimize applications efficiently.

Recommended for

  • Development teams looking for seamless integration with existing CI/CD pipelines
  • QA teams seeking a user-friendly interface for performance testing
  • Organizations that need to conduct scalable cloud-based load testing
  • Businesses aiming to identify and resolve performance issues rapidly to improve user experience

Cavisson NetStorm videos

No Cavisson NetStorm videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

LoadComplete videos

LoadComplete 101: Getting Started in LoadComplete | SmartBear Academy

More videos:

  • Review - Hello Yogurt Game Review 1080p Official LoadComplete
  • Review - Hello Yogurt Game Review 1080p Official LoadComplete

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Cavisson NetStorm and LoadComplete)
Monitoring Tools
32 32%
68% 68
Website Testing
28 28%
72% 72
Development
29 29%
71% 71
Online Services
22 22%
78% 78

User comments

Share your experience with using Cavisson NetStorm and LoadComplete. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, LoadComplete seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Cavisson NetStorm mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Cavisson NetStorm yet. Tracking of Cavisson NetStorm recommendations started around Mar 2021.

LoadComplete mentions (1)

  • Automated Performance Testing?
    Browser Testing: Hit pages with virtual users performing a flow e.g. Sign up, login. If you want a report of how many "real" users can use your app concurrently, then this testing would give the closest "real" world statistics. Cons - price and requires JS/TS scripting knowledge. Tools: BrowserStorm, Flood.IO, LoadNinja. Source: about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Cavisson NetStorm and LoadComplete, you can also consider the following products

WebLOAD - WebLOAD - The most flexible and cost effective software for enterprise load, stress and performance testing, integrated with DevOps processes. Click for details

StresStimulus - Load testing tool for websites and mobile that works with hard-to-test applications.

OctoPerf - OctoPerf is a SaaS load testing solution, based on JMeter.

SmartMeter.io - Performance Testing with Enterprise-Level Features with a familiar jMeter interface

k6 Cloud - Managed load testing service built on top of the popular open-source project k6.

LoadView - LoadView is a cloud-based load testing platform that allows users to stress-test their websites and web apps to know their performance level.