Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Carpalx QGMLWB VS Doom Emacs

Compare Carpalx QGMLWB VS Doom Emacs and see what are their differences

Carpalx QGMLWB logo Carpalx QGMLWB

Carpalx is a modifiable keyboard layout system that is based on applying a quantitative model of typing effort. QGMLWB is the fully optimized layout for letters.

Doom Emacs logo Doom Emacs

Emacs configuration similar to Spacemacs but faster and lighter.
  • Carpalx QGMLWB Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-25
  • Doom Emacs Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-21

Carpalx QGMLWB videos

No Carpalx QGMLWB videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Doom Emacs videos

Doom Emacs - Getting Started

More videos:

  • Review - Doom Emacs For Noobs

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Carpalx QGMLWB and Doom Emacs)
Keyboards
100 100%
0% 0
Text Editors
6 6%
94% 94
Video Presentation
100 100%
0% 0
IDE
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Carpalx QGMLWB and Doom Emacs. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Doom Emacs should be more popular than Carpalx QGMLWB. It has been mentiond 155 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Carpalx QGMLWB mentions (18)

  • Making a Keyboard Layout
    Don’t swap to a new layout, it’s too much work to learn. Instead, swap your K and E keys. E being common but not being in your home row is responsible for a significant chunk of the inefficiency of the QWERTY layout and even if you stop here you’ve already made a huge improvement. You’ll make typos involving K and E for a few days but you’ll adapt very quickly without ever having to go through the “learning a... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • How usable is Emacs with its default keybindings?
    Carpalx - keyboard layout optimizer. Source: over 1 year ago
  • GNU nano is my editor of choice (2021)
    Is difference in number of keystrokes (keychords) not fairly convincing evidence that, at the very least, vim results in less finger effort (and therefore lower risk of RSI) than other editors? Even if you don't believe that there's a speed advantage (it's entirely plausible that the delay from cognitive processing necessary to navigate vim's more complex interface dwarfs the speed increase of pressing... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • what is the best way to lay out the keyboard keys?
    There is a whole community dedicated to that: http://mkweb.bcgsc.ca/carpalx/. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • An AI designed keyboard layout
    I used the QGMLWY layout by Carpalx[0] for a year or so. The site is really interesting, worth a read. Afaik they made a list of the most common trigrams (three letter combinations) then used a genetic algorithm to optimize the layout for most of the same factors listed in OP's GitHub Readme (minimizing same finger sequences, certain kinds of movement). In the end I switched back to qwerty for 3 reasons: 1.... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
View more

Doom Emacs mentions (155)

  • Helix-gpui: helix gpui front end
    Having used evil-mode as my main driver for years, I can confirm that it truly works as expected. Requires some setup though. I used https://github.com/doomemacs/doomemacs to do the heavy lifting though. - Source: Hacker News / 18 days ago
  • M-X Reloaded: The Second Golden Age of Emacs – (Think)
    Yes, you need to install Emacs. It is probably available from whatever package manager your system uses. I prefer Doom (https://github.com/doomemacs/doomemacs) to Spacemacs. However I haven't looked at Spacemacs for many years; perhaps it's now on par with Doom. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • From Doom to Vanilla Emacs
    Ever since I've started my Emacs journey it seemed like the wholy grail to have your own (vanilla!) configuration without any hard dependencies on frameworks like Doom or Spacemacs. There are plenty of dotemacs configurations ouf there which can serve as a great source of inspiration. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Emacs 29.1 Released
    I am a long-time Emacs user and used to maintain my own config, but I switched to Doom Emacs [1] a year ago. Doom Emacs is like a pre-packaged/pre-configured emacs distro. You still need to configure the features that you want to use, but it's a lot easier (and faster) than having to do everything from scratch, and definitely if you already have some emacs background anyway. For me, it makes the newer, more... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • Not trying to start a rumble, but why emacs
    Try an emacs distribution and see if you like it:https://github.com/doomemacs/doomemacs. Source: 11 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Carpalx QGMLWB and Doom Emacs, you can also consider the following products

Colemak Mod-DH - Colemak Mod-DH is a minor modification to the Colemak alternative keyboard layout, moving the heavily-used 'D' & 'H' keys to the bottom row assignments for both index fingers.

Evil - The extensible vi layer for Emacs.

Colemak - Colemak is a modern keyboard touch typing layout designed to be a practical improvement on QWERTY and Dvorak layouts.

Org mode - Org: an Emacs Mode for Notes, Planning, and Authoring

Carpalx QGMLWY - A Carpalx variant with V fixed in its QWERTY position.

Neovim - Vim's rebirth for the 21st century