Cargo VS Sitecake

I have a domain with a mail on strato.de (S) and a website on cargo.site (C). Source: 6 months ago

I had struggles adding my webmail to a mail service and according to my webhost that was because I had the NS-Records pointed to my external website-host (where I built my website: https://cargo.site/). So I pointed the NS-Records back to the webhost and was told to point the domain to my site via A-Records (IP-adress) instead. Then I tried to ping my website to find out the IP adress and pointed my domains... Source: 6 months ago

As u/purpleornavy commented, you can use https://builtwith.com/ to find out what technologies were used to create a website. It appears the website you linked is created with cargo.site. If you look on their wesite in the templates section, you can actually find a template that is pretty similar to the website you linked. Source: 12 months ago

I like Cargo for this reason. Their templates are unique and much more intended for a “creatives” market. They offer discounts to students in the top design and art schools. My web developer professor this semester at Pratt talked a lot about this exact concept, though. He encouraged us to get creative and gave examples showing sites from the flash era. The websites a lot of people came up with in the class were... Source: about 1 year ago

Hey, loving your tool and have been using it a LOT recently. I'm a newbie to a lot of web management of DNS etc., so this might be an easy one: but when I look up my domain for example https://www.nslookup.io/domains/kristiankruse.com/dns-records/ it doesn't find any CNAME records, why is that? It's a cargo.site site so has to use their DNS Manager. Assuming that's why, but still wondered. Also, if you had... Source: about 1 year ago

Use something like this? CMS that generates static html? https://sitecake.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

I think that user experience of website builders with wysiwyg and drag and drop UX won over time. Then, as time passed by, website builders become bloated and complex. Once again you needed a professional to maintain your site in site builder. So now simple solutions, static HTML, free or one-time fee CMSs are sexy again. (economy is not good, who wants another subscription?) I know because 14 years ago we have... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

Https://sitecake.com/ works with simple html and PHP sites.... Veeeerrrry simple for client edits. Source: over 2 years ago

May be a suitable use case for https://sitecake.com/. Source: over 2 years ago

Other than that: Inline Editing CMS examples: Coast CMS, all you need to do is make the html editable with some classes and you're done. The CMS is kind of outdated though. Other examples: simplyedit.io, surrealcms.com, jocms.net, inlinecms.com, sitecake.com. Source: about 3 years ago