Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Capistrano VS Mina

Compare Capistrano VS Mina and see what are their differences

Capistrano logo Capistrano

A remote server automation and deployment tool written in Ruby

Mina logo Mina

Really fast deployer and server automation tool
  • Capistrano Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-18
  • Mina Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-29

Capistrano features and specs

  • Automated Deployment
    Capistrano automates the deployment process, reducing the risk of human error and saving time by allowing for continuous deployment.
  • SSH Support
    Leverages SSH for secure communication with servers, ensuring a safe and encrypted connection which is essential for production environments.
  • Customizable Workflows
    Provides the flexibility to customize deployment workflows and tasks to fit unique requirements, offering more control over the deployment process.
  • Rollbacks
    Supports easy rollbacks to previous versions, which is crucial in quickly reverting changes in case of deployment issues.
  • Multi-Server Support
    Enables deployment to multiple servers, making it suitable for applications requiring load balancing or distributed systems.

Possible disadvantages of Capistrano

  • Ruby Dependency
    Requires Ruby, which can be a limitation for teams not using Ruby for other parts of their stack or have restrictions on adding new dependencies.
  • Initial Configuration Complexity
    Setting up Capistrano can be complex, especially for those unfamiliar with Ruby or SSH, requiring an additional learning curve.
  • Limited Windows Support
    Primarily designed for Unix-based systems, which may present challenges when deploying to or from Windows environments.
  • Plugin Dependency Management
    While powerful plugins exist, managing them and their dependencies can lead to complexities and potential conflicts over time.
  • Not Ideal for Non-Ruby Projects
    Originally designed for Ruby on Rails applications, making it less seamless for projects that don't fit this framework.

Mina features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Mina is known for being lightweight and efficient, making it fast with minimal resource consumption, especially compared to other deployment tools.
  • Speed
    Due to its efficient design, Mina offers fast deployment processes, which can significantly reduce the time it takes to deploy updates to applications.
  • Simplicity
    Mina provides a simple and straightforward DSL for defining deployment tasks, which can be easier to maintain and understand compared to more complex tools.
  • Incremental Deployments
    Mina facilitates incremental deployments, which can efficiently transfer only the parts of the application that have changed, saving time and bandwidth.

Possible disadvantages of Mina

  • Limited Features
    Compared to more comprehensive deployment tools like Capistrano, Mina has a smaller feature set, which might not be sufficient for more complex deployments.
  • Community and Support
    Mina has a smaller user base and community compared to more established deployment tools, so finding community support and resources might be harder.
  • Plugin Ecosystem
    The ecosystem of plugins and integrations for Mina is not as extensive as other tools, which might require additional custom development for certain features.
  • Configuration Complexity
    While Mina is simpler overall, certain configurations and scaling beyond basic use cases can become complex and require more effort to manage properly.

Capistrano videos

Ranch Road Boots EPIC In-Depth Review: Capistrano Black

More videos:

  • Review - Armani Exchange Capistrano watch review
  • Review - Review Americas Best Value Laguna Inn & Suites (San Juan Capistrano (CA), United States)

Mina videos

MINA IBROW HENNA IN MEDIUM BROWN REVIEW

More videos:

  • Review - Mina Baie MIDI Stevie Review
  • Review - $50 Human Hair Lace Front Wig?! | Bobbi Boss Mina Wig Review | THE TASTEMAKER

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Capistrano and Mina)
DevOps Tools
65 65%
35% 35
SSH
0 0%
100% 100
Continuous Integration
100 100%
0% 0
VPS
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Capistrano and Mina. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Capistrano should be more popular than Mina. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Capistrano mentions (10)

  • Multiple deployments and High Availability with Mina and Ruby on Rails
    However this model is generic to any client-server / monolithic / micro services approach and to any languages and frameworks. In my project I use Mina (Formerly using Capistrano), so that means that on each deployment the script makes a SSH-in to the remote machine and performs the deployment process: Git clone, Git pull, rake db:migrate assets:precompile, puma:restart, etc… Before using Capistrano I was doing... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Type of programming language.
    I think Capistrano is a good example. Their homepage snippet shows you what a DSL is. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Peace - Zero Stress Automation framework + website
    I think it's something like https://capistranorb.com/. Source: over 2 years ago
  • How do I learn production/deployment process?
    That should give you lots of stuff to research but I'll leave you with a final point: Every project is going to be different. Use the right tool for the right job; for a small application you definitely don't need Kubernetes, you might be fine without any pipeline at all. For example, Ruby on Rails projects can use a tool called capistrano to script deploys and you can run that from your local machine any time you... Source: over 2 years ago
  • Jenkins CI or CI/CD
    I personally consider Jenkins a Task Runner that has a massive collection of CI plugins. Anyone can do deployments/delivery from a task runner, but any deployments I had to do in Jenkins ended up needing custom code written to do the actual work. This isn't unique to Jenkins; before the days of kubernetes, we had tools like capistrano or Config Management tools like Chef and Puppet that were capable of doing... Source: almost 3 years ago
View more

Mina mentions (1)

  • Creating {legacy} static build via docker and deploying with mina-scp
    In this post, I will walk you through the steps with which we can move our frontend build creation script into the docker container and deploy through mina and mian-scp gems seamlessly. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Capistrano and Mina, you can also consider the following products

Ansible - Radically simple configuration-management, application deployment, task-execution, and multi-node orchestration engine

SlickStack - SlickStack is a free LEMP stack automation script written in Bash designed to enhance and simplify WordPress provisioning, performance, and security.

Deployer - Deployment Tool for PHP

Ásbrú Connection Manager - A user interface that helps organizing remote terminal sessions and automating repetitive tasks.

Driver Talent - Driver Talent is an easy to use application, designed to help you get the drivers you need for your system.

EasyEngine - Easy WordPress Nginx