Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Cadence Workflow VS cDevWorkflow

Compare Cadence Workflow VS cDevWorkflow and see what are their differences

Hive
Seamless project management and collaboration for your team. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

Cadence Workflow logo Cadence Workflow

Developer focused code only open source workflow engine developed by Uber.

cDevWorkflow logo cDevWorkflow

cDev Workflow is a business management process software solution which aims to simplify complex processes into simpler ones.
  • Cadence Workflow Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-18
  • cDevWorkflow Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-30

Cadence Workflow features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

cDevWorkflow features and specs

  • Comprehensive Feature Set
    FlowWright offers a robust set of workflow management features including process automation, task management, and complex event processing. This makes it suitable for a wide range of business applications.
  • Scalability
    The platform is designed to scale with the needs of growing businesses, handling everything from simple workflows to complex, enterprise-grade automation processes.
  • Integration Capabilities
    FlowWright can integrate with various third-party applications and services, allowing for seamless data exchange and enhanced functionality across different business systems.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The software features an intuitive drag-and-drop interface, making it accessible for users with varying levels of technical expertise.
  • Customization
    FlowWright offers a high degree of customization, enabling organizations to tailor workflows and processes to their specific requirements.

Possible disadvantages of cDevWorkflow

  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, FlowWright's extensive feature set can be overwhelming for new users, requiring time and training to fully grasp.
  • Cost
    The platform may be expensive for small businesses or startups, particularly those that do not require its full range of features.
  • Initial Setup
    Setting up FlowWright can be complex and time-consuming, especially for organizations that need to integrate it with existing systems.
  • Dependency on Internet
    As a cloud-based solution, its performance is heavily dependent on internet connectivity and speed, which could be a limitation in areas with poor internet service.
  • Limited Offline Functionality
    The software lacks robust offline capabilities, which can be a drawback for organizations that require constant access to workflow management tools.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Cadence Workflow and cDevWorkflow)

Cadence Workflow

cDevWorkflow

Automation
100 100%
Automation
0% 0
BPM
17 17%
BPM
83% 83
Workflow Automation
15 15%
Workflow Automation
85% 85
BPM Platform
0 0%
BPM Platform
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Cadence Workflow and cDevWorkflow. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Cadence Workflow seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 8 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Cadence Workflow mentions (8)

  • Ask HN: Who is hiring? (October 2024)
    Uber (in Denmark) | https://www.uber.com/ | Software Engineer (all levels) | Hybrid EU (Aarhus, Denmark) | Full-time | https://www.uber.com/dk/en/careers/list/?location=DNK--Aarhus We're an office of 120+ people, all in engineering, we're responsible for creating and supporting Uber's compute platforms for the entire company. Come join us in Aarhus as we continue to build and scale out our platform of: - One of... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • [P] My co-founder and I quit our engineering jobs at AWS to build “Tensor Search”. Here is why.
    Emit events from your primary DB (postgres, etc.) to something like kafka or rabbitmq and then catch that in your search engine. There's also some end-to-end solutions like temporal (temporal.io) or cadence (https://cadenceworkflow.io/). Source: over 2 years ago
  • How can you ensure all Microservices have finished their tasks?
    You should definitely check Uber Cadence https://cadenceworkflow.io/. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Apache Hop 2.0
    Cadence: https://cadenceworkflow.io. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
  • Which schedule technology you would choose for a new project?
    Dear community, I will be please to get your feedback to choose a schedule engine in 2022 in microservice context. On this field they are at least 2 challengers to me, ¹ nomad from hashicorp and ² cadence from uber. While kubernetes lead this field. Source: over 3 years ago
View more

cDevWorkflow mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of cDevWorkflow yet. Tracking of cDevWorkflow recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Cadence Workflow and cDevWorkflow, you can also consider the following products

Camunda - The Universal Process Orchestrator

Appian - See how Appian, leading provider of modern low-code and BPM software solutions, has helped transform the businesses of over 3.5 million users worldwide.

Workflow Engine - .NET & .NET Core workflow engine, and a standalone workflow server that enable you to add custom executable workflows of any complexity to your app.

Scoop Solar - Scoop Solar is a comprehensive mobile business process management tool for growing solar companies.

Activiti - Activiti is a light-weight workflow and Business Process Management (BPM) Platform targeted at...

Kintone - Build business apps and supercharge your company's productivity with kintone's all-in-one...

Loading...