Bunny.net VS Buildbot

I wanted to migrate a static website from a VPS to a CDN to improve website loading time and SEO performance. After a few searches, I discovered a new sleek CDN called BunnyCDN, which beats all performance charts in latency with an average of 40ms. That's what I was looking for! - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

This is great news. Now I can utilize any CDN provider that supports S3. Like bunny.net [1] which has image optimization, just like Supabase does but with better pricing and features. I have been developing with Supabase past two months. I would say there are still some rough corners in general and some basic features missing. Example Supabase storage has no direct support for metadata [2][3]. Overall I like the... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

It seems there's no discord community yet for bunny.net, would someone be interested in setting this up? Source: 6 months ago

Use a CDN like Bunny and you can host images for like $1/mo + less than $0.10/gb of bandwidth. Source: 6 months ago

You'll want a CDN like Bunny (at least for the files), instead of a web host. Source: 7 months ago

Buildbot is a versatile CI framework designed to automate all aspects of the software development cycle, enhancing efficiency and reliability. As an open-source platform, it is highly customizable, allowing teams to tailor the automation process to their specific needs. Buildbot excels in integrating various stages of development, from code integration, testing, to deployment, ensuring a seamless and coherent... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

If you want more than the builtin CIs in Github and Gitlab, https://buildbot.net is the way. Source: about 1 year ago

If you don't have one already integrated with your source control, buildbot is pretty nice and doesn't force you to use docker like most others. Source: over 1 year ago

Https://buildbot.net/ existed before Jenkins Hudson and was quite well known. Source: over 1 year ago

I have used python based CI tool buildbot which is a great tool but we want to move away from buildbot only because in some scenarios we want to compile low-level microseconds which are in c++ to a different architecture. Buildbot doesn't have such a feature. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago