Software Alternatives & Reviews

Bull VS s6

Compare Bull VS s6 and see what are their differences

Bull logo Bull

Bull is a Node library that implements a fast and robust queue system based on redis.

s6 logo s6

s6 is a small suite of programs for UNIX, designed for process supervision. It can be used as an init system, or as separate supervision components.
  • Bull Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-02
  • s6 Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-05-25

Bull videos

Designated Survivor​ Review​, Bull Review - Keifer Sutherland, Michael Weatherly

More videos:

  • Review - Bull power585 tractor price and owner review
  • Review - Energy Crisis--Energy Drink Review #150 Red Bull Summer Edition

s6 videos

Samsung Galaxy S6 Review!

More videos:

  • Review - Galaxy Tab S6 Honest Review - Only one issue..
  • Review - Samsung Galaxy S6 In 2020! (Still Worth It?) (Review)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Bull and s6)
Data Integration
100 100%
0% 0
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Web Service Automation
100 100%
0% 0
Log Management
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Bull and s6. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, s6 seems to be a lot more popular than Bull. While we know about 11 links to s6, we've tracked only 1 mention of Bull. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Bull mentions (1)

  • Crone Job with dynamic interval
    Use bull queue with “delay” parameter. You can create as many jobs scheduled that way as you want. https://optimalbits.github.io/bull/. Source: about 1 year ago

s6 mentions (11)

  • Which do you use systemd or openrc? Why do you use what you use?
    This page and this page, both by Laurent Bercot, creator of s6. Source: about 1 year ago
  • init software: What's the difference?
    Of the two I have experience with, runit is simpler and thus easier to get the hang of than s6-rc/s6. Though the s6 (not s6-rc) docs at the author's site contain a lot of info (including apologetics and rationales) that applies almost equally well to runit. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Trouble with s6 services
    Using the s6-service add command I added a service called "libvertd" when I ment to put "libvirtd". Now when I run s6-db-reload it spits out a error message saying "undefined service name libvertd". But I cant remove it using s6-service remove libvertd because that just spits out a generic help message and doesn't change anything. I also couldn't find documentation on Https://skarnet.org/software/s6/ or... Source: over 1 year ago
  • Alpine Linux is reducing dependencies on Busybox
    For the trivia, this is pushed by Laurent Bercot (skarnet), creator of s6, execline and many others. He's also working on implementing s6 as Alpine init and rc systems. https://skarnet.org/software/s6/ https://skarnet.com/projects/service-manager.html. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • The DJB Legacy
    FWIW, the spirit of daemontools lives on in the s6 project. https://skarnet.org/software/s6/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Bull and s6, you can also consider the following products

Hangfire - An easy way to perform background processing in .NET and .NET Core applications.

systemd - systemd is a replacement for the init daemon for Linux (either System V or BSD-style).

Sidekiq - Sidekiq is a simple, efficient framework for background job processing in Ruby

runit - runit is a cross-platform Unix init scheme with service supervision, a replacement for sysvinit...

Resque - Resque is a Redis-backed Ruby library for creating background jobs, placing them on multiple queues, and processing them later.

sysvinit - Savannah is a central point for development, distribution and maintenance of free software, both GNU and non-GNU.