BuiltWith Reviews

1. Eleanor Bennett

   | Digital Marketing Specialist at Logit.io | about 2 years ago
   Great for finding potential contacts

   A great tool to help you discover the technology being used by a variety of websites. I was impressed that upon signing up that I had full access to a free list of leads.

Cppcheck Reviews

BuiltWith mentions (159)

• Disney's Robots Use Rockets to Stick the Landing

  Also, wow that is an obsene amount of libraries they use: https://builtwith.com/?https%3a%2f%2fspectrum.ieee.org%2fdisney-robot-2668135204. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

• What website frameworks are used to build these websites?

  I would say run both sites through https://builtwith.com/ to get what all they used in the building process. Source: 6 months ago

• Reddit just completed their migration out of React

  There's a plugin called React Dev Tools that changes color (and other stuff) on React sites. There's also a really fun tool called builtwith (it doesn't work on reddit, but works on lots of other sites). Source: 6 months ago

• 3 one-person million dollar online businesses

  BuiltWith https://builtwith.com/: This is probably the OG in one-person business. It is a by-product of solving his own pain point. Source: 7 months ago

• Toxic open source leads to unpatched security vulnerability in e-commerce

  OpenCart is an e-commerce app used in almost 300k online shops as of today, according to builtwith.com For context thats 2 times more than Magento. Source: 7 months ago

Cppcheck mentions (10)

• Configuring Cppcheck, Cpplint, and JSON Lint

  I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

• Enforcing Memory Safety?

  Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code. Source: about 1 year ago

• Static Code analysis

  For my own projects, I used cppcheck. You can check out that tool to get a feel. Depending on what industry your in, you might need to follow a standard like Misra. Source: about 1 year ago

• How do you not shoot yourself in the foot ?

  Https://cppcheck.sourceforge.io/ (there are many other static analysis tools, I just haven't used them or didn't care for them). Source: about 1 year ago

• Linting tool for prohibiting the use of specific std types

  Sounds like something that could simply be communicated with the team that writes the tests. Unless you have dozens of such classes. In that case, you could just use e.g. Cppcheck and add a rule (regular expression) that searches for usages of the forbidden classes. Source: over 1 year ago