Software Alternatives & Reviews

Buildr VS Ninja Build

Compare Buildr VS Ninja Build and see what are their differences

Buildr logo Buildr

Apache Buildr is a build system for Java-based applications, including support for Scala, Groovy...

Ninja Build logo Ninja Build

Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.
Buildr Landing Page
Buildr Landing Page
Ninja Build Landing Page
Ninja Build Landing Page

Buildr details

Front End Package Manager JavaScript Package Manager JS Build Tools

Ninja Build details

Front End Package Manager JavaScript Package Manager JS Build Tools

Buildr videos

No Buildr videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Ninja Build videos


Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Buildr and Ninja Build)

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Ninja Build seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 12 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on Reddit, HackerNews and some other platforms. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Buildr mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Buildr yet. Tracking of Buildr recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Ninja Build mentions (12)

  • My RISC-V OSDev journey, so far
    Familiarity with compiling software from source and build systems. If not already familiar with an existing build system such as Make or Ninja, the best way to familiarize yourself with them is to simply build and install a bunch of software from source, such as giving Linux From Scratch (LFS) a go - by the time you manage to complete LFS, you'll certainly be able to recite configure; make; make install... - Source: / about 2 months ago
  • Made a wrapper for gcc with Bash
    You're not supposed to write ninja yourself. From the ninja website:. - Source: Reddit / 4 months ago
  • I tried Turborepo and I liked it
    I was just investigating whether Ninja ("where other build systems are high-level languages Ninja aims to be an assembler") could be used to build a DIY monorepo toolkit. It might be a long road, especially given the complexity of JS development these days. We don't just need an "incremental rebuild" on top of locally-modified files that produce a single artifact; we need hot reloading, multiple entry points,... - Source: Reddit / 4 months ago
  • A Tutorial on Portable Makefiles
    Recovering an ancient project (K&R C !) sent me back down the "which build tool should I be using?" rabbit hole. First approximation: No one's happy with any tool, with good reason. Then I discovered Ninja. It's an assembly language for builds, advertised as a back end for higher level tools, but many people script Ninja themselves in their favorite language. Ninja is exceptionally fast, and handles parallelism... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • aurutils: support for the ninja build system
    Also had no knowledge of ninja before reading your post. - Source: Reddit / 10 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Buildr and Ninja Build, you can also consider the following products

qmake - Qt 5 qmake Makefile generator tool

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

Meson - Meson is an open source build system meant to be both extremely fast, and, even more importantly...

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

Gradle - Accelerate developer productivity. Gradle helps teams build, automate and deliver better software, faster. DocsExplore the documentation of Gradle. Find installation ..

User reviews

Share your experience with using Buildr and Ninja Build. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with