Software Alternatives & Reviews

Buildbot VS Hudson

Compare Buildbot VS Hudson and see what are their differences

Buildbot logo Buildbot

Python-based continuous integration testing framework

Hudson logo Hudson

Hudson is an extensible Continuous Integration Server
  • Buildbot Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-21
  • Hudson Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-29

Buildbot videos

Craig Rodrigues - Migrating Python.org to Buildbot 9 and Python 3 - SF Python Meetup

Hudson videos

Hudson H9 Review: Meme or Magical?

More videos:

  • Review - Could The Hudson H9 Be A Collectors Item? 🤔
  • Review - Hudson Whisky Single Malt Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Buildbot and Hudson)
Continuous Integration
63 63%
37% 37
DevOps Tools
65 65%
35% 35
Continuous Deployment
67 67%
33% 33
Code Collaboration
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Buildbot and Hudson. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Buildbot seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Buildbot mentions (9)

  • 10 open source tools that platform, SRE and DevOps engineers should consider in 2024.
    Buildbot is a versatile CI framework designed to automate all aspects of the software development cycle, enhancing efficiency and reliability. As an open-source platform, it is highly customizable, allowing teams to tailor the automation process to their specific needs. Buildbot excels in integrating various stages of development, from code integration, testing, to deployment, ensuring a seamless and coherent... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Continuos Integration and C++
    If you want more than the builtin CIs in Github and Gitlab, https://buildbot.net is the way. Source: about 1 year ago
  • What are the open source CI/CD tools for C++ (comparable to Ansible, Jenkins, etc.)?
    If you don't have one already integrated with your source control, buildbot is pretty nice and doesn't force you to use docker like most others. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Why Jenkins?
    Https://buildbot.net/ existed before Jenkins Hudson and was quite well known. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Which is the best CI/CD self-hosted open source tool?
    I have used python based CI tool buildbot which is a great tool but we want to move away from buildbot only because in some scenarios we want to compile low-level microseconds which are in c++ to a different architecture. Buildbot doesn't have such a feature. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
View more

Hudson mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Hudson yet. Tracking of Hudson recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Buildbot and Hudson, you can also consider the following products

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

Travis CI - Focus on writing code. Let Travis CI take care of running your tests and deploying your apps.

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

Codeship - Codeship is a fast and secure hosted Continuous Delivery platform that scales with your needs.

Drone.io - Continuous Integration For GitHub and Bitbucket That Monitors Your code For Bugs

Buildkite - Buildkite is a platform for running fast, secure, and scalable continuous integration pipelines on your own infrastructure.