Buildbot VS Chocolatey
Compare Buildbot VS Chocolatey and see what are their differences
Auto arrange all your app windows, whether on one screen or many with a single click!
featured
Buildbot
Jenkins
Travis CI
CircleCI
Drone.io
Codeship
JetBrains TeamCity
Buildkite
Chocolatey
Ninite
Scoop
Homebrew
Just Install
Patch My PC
PDQ Deploy
WAPT Community
Buildbot ChocolateyBased on our record, Chocolatey seems to be a lot more popular than Buildbot. While we know about 252 links to Chocolatey, we've tracked only 9 mentions of Buildbot. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Buildbot is a versatile CI framework designed to automate all aspects of the software development cycle, enhancing efficiency and reliability. As an open-source platform, it is highly customizable, allowing teams to tailor the automation process to their specific needs. Buildbot excels in integrating various stages of development, from code integration, testing, to deployment, ensuring a seamless and coherent... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
If you want more than the builtin CIs in Github and Gitlab, https://buildbot.net is the way. Source: about 1 year ago
If you don't have one already integrated with your source control, buildbot is pretty nice and doesn't force you to use docker like most others. Source: over 1 year ago
Https://buildbot.net/ existed before Jenkins Hudson and was quite well known. Source: over 1 year ago
I have used python based CI tool buildbot which is a great tool but we want to move away from buildbot only because in some scenarios we want to compile low-level microseconds which are in c++ to a different architecture. Buildbot doesn't have such a feature. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
Chocolatey Windows software management solution, we use this for installing Python and Deno. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
Authenticating with Kyma is a (in my opinion) unnecessary challenge as it leverages the OIDC-login plugin for kubectl. You find a description of the setup here. This works fine when on a Mac but can give you some headaches on a Windows and on Linux machine especially when combined with restrictive setups in corporate environments. For Windows I can only recommend installing krew via chocolatey and then install the... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
On a Windows machine, you can use Chocolatey by running the command. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
I've used WSL2 and GHC/Nix--worked without any issues. However, there is Chocolatey: https://chocolatey.org/. Source: 6 months ago
For OSX there is homebrew or pyenv (pyenv is another solution on Linux). As pyenv compiles from source it will require setting up XCode (the Apple IDE) tools to support this which can be pretty bulky. Windows users have chocolatey but the issue there is it works off the binaries. That means it won't have the latest security release available since those are source only. Conda is also another solution which can be... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development
Ninite - Ninite is the easiest way to install software.
Travis CI - Focus on writing code. Let Travis CI take care of running your tests and deploying your apps.
Scoop - A command-line installer for Windows
CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.
Homebrew - The missing package manager for macOS