Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Buildbot VS Agola

Compare Buildbot VS Agola and see what are their differences

Buildbot logo Buildbot

Python-based continuous integration testing framework

Agola logo Agola

A selfhosted open source CI/CD server build around the git workflow.
  • Buildbot Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-21
  • Agola Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-29

Buildbot videos

Craig Rodrigues - Migrating Python.org to Buildbot 9 and Python 3 - SF Python Meetup

Agola videos

AGOLA Toys Production

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Buildbot and Agola)
Continuous Integration
83 83%
17% 17
Continuous Deployment
83 83%
17% 17
DevOps Tools
85 85%
15% 15
Code Collaboration
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Buildbot and Agola. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Buildbot should be more popular than Agola. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Buildbot mentions (9)

  • 10 open source tools that platform, SRE and DevOps engineers should consider in 2024.
    Buildbot is a versatile CI framework designed to automate all aspects of the software development cycle, enhancing efficiency and reliability. As an open-source platform, it is highly customizable, allowing teams to tailor the automation process to their specific needs. Buildbot excels in integrating various stages of development, from code integration, testing, to deployment, ensuring a seamless and coherent... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Continuos Integration and C++
    If you want more than the builtin CIs in Github and Gitlab, https://buildbot.net is the way. Source: about 1 year ago
  • What are the open source CI/CD tools for C++ (comparable to Ansible, Jenkins, etc.)?
    If you don't have one already integrated with your source control, buildbot is pretty nice and doesn't force you to use docker like most others. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Why Jenkins?
    Https://buildbot.net/ existed before Jenkins Hudson and was quite well known. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Which is the best CI/CD self-hosted open source tool?
    I have used python based CI tool buildbot which is a great tool but we want to move away from buildbot only because in some scenarios we want to compile low-level microseconds which are in c++ to a different architecture. Buildbot doesn't have such a feature. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
View more

Agola mentions (1)

  • Open source and collaborative platform for CI/CD
    Yes, drone.io or woodpecker (to stay on the FOSS side) are simpler than most alternatives, I had some hopes in https://agola.io/ but could not finish the tutorials due to random errors, and most other solutions are either a hassle to setup and integrate (buildbot), a vulnerable honeypot (jenkins), or require an existing k8s cluster or even more managed infra. At some point it is easier to install a gitlab omnibus... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Buildbot and Agola, you can also consider the following products

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

Travis CI - Focus on writing code. Let Travis CI take care of running your tests and deploying your apps.

Drone.io - Continuous Integration For GitHub and Bitbucket That Monitors Your code For Bugs

Concourse - Pipeline-based CI system written in Go

Codeship - Codeship is a fast and secure hosted Continuous Delivery platform that scales with your needs.