Software Alternatives & Reviews

bugScout VS Splint

Compare bugScout VS Splint and see what are their differences

bugScout logo bugScout

Our goal is to provide our customers with an end-to-end Information Security service in their web applications, from the development phase through to maintenance.

Splint logo Splint

Splint Home Page
  • bugScout Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-05-09
  • Splint Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-01-23

bugScout videos

DEMO | bugScout Next-gen Source Code Analysis

Splint videos

Will a Night Splint Help Your Plantar Fasciitis? We Review 3 Braces.

More videos:

  • Review - Will A Night Splint Help Your Plantar Fasciitis?

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to bugScout and Splint)
Code Analysis
52 52%
48% 48
Code Collaboration
100 100%
0% 0
Code Coverage
0 0%
100% 100
Security & Privacy
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using bugScout and Splint. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Splint seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

bugScout mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of bugScout yet. Tracking of bugScout recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Splint mentions (9)

  • C-rusted: The Advantages of Rust, in C, without the Disadvantages
    Whenever I see people talk about the portability or compatibility advantages of C, I'm reminded of how "even C isn't compatible with C", because you typically aren't talking about up-to-date GCC or LLVM on these niche platforms... you're talking about some weird or archaic vendor-provided compiler... Possibly with syntax extensions that static analyzers like splint will choke on. (Splint can't even understand near... Source: about 1 year ago
  • Announcing Rust 1.67.1
    Huh. I think I actually needed to use the equivalent position for certain splint annotations in my C retro-hobby project. Source: about 1 year ago
  • US NGO Consumer Reports also reporting on C and C++ safety for product development.
    I often like to say that Rust's bindings are a way to trick people into writing the compile-time safety annotations that they didn't want to write for things like splint. (Seriously. Look into how much splint is capable of checking with the correct annotations.). Source: over 1 year ago
  • “Rust is safe” is not some kind of absolute guarantee of code safety
    Linters like Splint [0] can do that for C. I’m not saying that Rust’s built-in approach isn’t better, but please be careful about what exactly you claim. [0] http://splint.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Glauber's Journey from rust to typescript
    (Sort of like how, for my DOS hobby project, I use splint to require explicit casts between typedefs so I can use the newtype pattern without having to manually reach into wrapper struct fields in places that don't do conversions.). Source: almost 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing bugScout and Splint, you can also consider the following products

Checkmarx - The industry’s most comprehensive AppSec platform, Checkmarx One is fast, accurate, and accelerates your business.

Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free

Cppcheck - Cppcheck is an analysis tool for C/C++ code. It detects the types of bugs that the compilers normally fail to detect. The goal is no false positives. CppCheckDownload cppcheck for free.

Appknox - Appknox is a cloud-based mobile app security solution to detect threats and vulnerabilities in the app.

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

HCL AppScan - HCL Software Site