Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

BrowserStack VS WAPT

Compare BrowserStack VS WAPT and see what are their differences

BrowserStack logo BrowserStack

BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.

WAPT logo WAPT

Load, Stress and Performance Testing for Websites and Web Applications
  • BrowserStack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2025-05-06

BrowserStack is a leading software testing platform powering over two million tests every day across 15 global data centers. With BrowserStack, developers can comprehensively test their websites and mobile applications across 2,000+ real mobile devices and browsers in a single cloud platform—and at scale. BrowserStack helps Tesco, Shell, NVIDIA, Discovery, Wells Fargo, and over 50,000 customers deliver quality software at speed.

  • WAPT Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-27

BrowserStack

$ Details
freemium $29.0 / Monthly (Starts at single user plans and billed annually)
Platforms
Mac OSX Android Windows Browser Web iOS Google Chrome Firefox Safari REST API Internet Explorer
Release Date
2012 September
Startup details
Country
Ireland
State
Dublin
City
Dublin
Founder(s)
Nakul Aggarwal
Employees
500 - 999

BrowserStack features and specs

  • Cloud-based
  • Browser Extensions
  • SaaS

WAPT features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    WAPT offers a user-friendly interface that makes it accessible for users who may not have extensive experience in load testing.
  • Flexibility
    WAPT supports a wide range of web technologies and protocols, making it versatile for testing different types of web applications.
  • Detailed Reporting
    The tool provides comprehensive reporting capabilities that help identify performance bottlenecks and other issues.
  • Scalability
    WAPT can scale from small to large-scale tests, allowing users to simulate tens of thousands of virtual users.
  • Integration with CI/CD
    The tool can be integrated with continuous integration/continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipelines, which is beneficial for automated testing.

Possible disadvantages of WAPT

  • Cost
    WAPT is a commercial product, and its licensing costs can be high for small businesses or individual developers.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running large-scale load tests can be resource-intensive, requiring significant computational power and memory.
  • Limited Scripting Language
    The scripting language offered by WAPT might not be as powerful or flexible as those provided by some other load testing tools.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite being user-friendly, getting the most out of WAPT's advanced features may require a learning curve.
  • Windows Only
    WAPT is primarily a Windows-based tool, which could be a limitation for organizations that primarily use other operating systems.

BrowserStack videos

BrowserStack Overview

More videos:

  • Tutorial - SpeedLab by BrowserStack
  • Review - SharePoint Team Finds BrowserStack Invaluable

WAPT videos

eWAPT Exam - eLearnSecurity Web Application Penetration Tester - Exam and Course Review

More videos:

  • Review - WAPT - Load Testing for Websites and Web Applications
  • Review - Web Application Penetration Testing (WAPT)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to BrowserStack and WAPT)
Website Testing
95 95%
5% 5
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Browser Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Automated Testing
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using BrowserStack and WAPT. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare BrowserStack and WAPT

BrowserStack Reviews

Top Selenium Alternatives
BrowserStack is another leading cloud-based testing platform that offers access to a vast array of browsers and real mobile devices. It's designed to simplify the testing process by allowing tests to run in parallel across different environments, significantly reducing the time needed for comprehensive testing. BrowserStack features include live, interactive testing,...
Source: bugbug.io
Why choose HeadSpin over BrowserStack?
Companies like HeadSpin and BrowserStack play a significant role in fulfilling the demand for testing on real devices and cross-browser devices. Their ability to test on real devices online and monitor digital experiences adds to the value proposition of organizations implementing testing solutions. However, every company has different requirements and here are a few reasons...
Source: www.headspin.io

WAPT Reviews

We have no reviews of WAPT yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, BrowserStack seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

BrowserStack mentions (7)

View more

WAPT mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of WAPT yet. Tracking of WAPT recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing BrowserStack and WAPT, you can also consider the following products

LambdaTest - Perform Web Testing on 2000+ Browsers & OS

WebLOAD - WebLOAD - The most flexible and cost effective software for enterprise load, stress and performance testing, integrated with DevOps processes. Click for details

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

OctoPerf - OctoPerf is a SaaS load testing solution, based on JMeter.

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

StresStimulus - Load testing tool for websites and mobile that works with hard-to-test applications.